Please correct me if I'm wrong, but I think it's safer to use `EXTRADLLFLAGS` for specific modules instead.
Otherwise, could you take a look at the following failures?
--- #### Possible regression in [`ntdll:info` from pipeline #16935](https://gitlab.winehq.org/zfigura/wine/-/jobs/33742#L2259):
``` ntdll:info start dlls/ntdll/tests/info.c info.c:195: Test failed: wrong limit FFFEFFFF info.c:197: Test succeeded inside todo block: wrong limit FFFEFFFF info.c:220: Test marked todo: got wrong status 0 wow64 1 ```
--- #### Possible regression in [`ntdll:wow64` from pipeline #16935](https://gitlab.winehq.org/zfigura/wine/-/jobs/33742#L2413):
``` ntdll:wow64 start dlls/ntdll/tests/wow64.c wow64.c:716: Test marked todo: wrong page size 0 wow64.c:718: Test marked todo: wrong flags 0 wow64.c:720: Test marked todo: wrong machine 0 / 8664 wow64.c:722: Test marked todo: wrong machine 0 wow64.c:734: wow64info found at 78 wow64.c:788: no WOW64INFO section handle wow64.c:945: cs 0023 ss 002b fs 0063 wow64.c:1655: Test marked todo: NtWow64WriteVirtualMemory64 failed 0 wow64.c:1658: Test marked todo: wrong size c wow64.c:1664: Test marked todo: NtWow64AllocateVirtualMemory64 failed 40000002 wow64.c:1691: Test failed: wrong limit FFFEFFFF wow64.c:1693: Test succeeded inside todo block: wrong limit FFFEFFFF ```