From: Esme Povirk esme@codeweavers.com
Wine-Bug: https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53435
I prefer not to delete any tests, but I see no way to preserve this one while accounting for the possibility of an ignored message coming in during the 100 ms wait, and for the most part it seems redundant with other tests. --- dlls/user32/tests/msg.c | 5 ----- 1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/dlls/user32/tests/msg.c b/dlls/user32/tests/msg.c index c05982a9939..9ae772fc355 100644 --- a/dlls/user32/tests/msg.c +++ b/dlls/user32/tests/msg.c @@ -19688,11 +19688,6 @@ static void test_SendMessage_other_thread(int thread_n) /* intentionally yield */ MsgWaitForMultipleObjects(0, NULL, FALSE, 100, qs_all_input);
- ret = GetQueueStatus(QS_SENDMESSAGE|QS_POSTMESSAGE); - /* FIXME: remove once Wine is fixed */ - todo_wine_if (thread_n == 2) - ok(ret == 0, "wrong status %08lx\n", ret); - if (winetest_debug > 1) trace("main: call PeekMessage\n"); ok(!PeekMessageA(&msg, 0, 0, 0, PM_REMOVE), "PeekMessage should fail\n"); ok_sequence(WmEmptySeq, "SendMessage from other thread 5", thread_n == 2);