On Mon Nov 13 14:42:37 2023 +0000, Nikolay Sivov wrote:
This version still does Stop() and immediately Start() on sources, without waiting for anything.
Actually, I don't think the Stop() is necessary. The only reason why I added the Stop() call is that's what the tests show. It would be simpler if I removed the Stop() call and adding it now just complicates things. Do you think it is ok if I do that?