Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] MR6776: d3dx9: D3DXSaveSurfaceToFileInMemory() improvements, part 1.

[Connor McAdams (＠cmcadams)]

On Mon Nov 11 15:37:29 2024 +0000, Matteo Bruni wrote:
> Yeah, I was thinking about potentially passing the structure to
> `check_dds_header()`. This is certainly fine but I'm wondering what
> makes it ugly for other tests. Is it hard to make them table-based like
> `test_save_surface_to_dds()` (i.e. looping on test cases in a `tests[]`
> array of structures)?

Largely just that it'd be extra work to make the older, existing tests that we're using this new function for table based and I'm lazy :D I can modify them to use a table if you think it'd be worth it.