On Sat Jun 22 17:52:34 2024 +0000, Esme Povirk wrote:
This seems like it might be backwards to me? I think it's checking whether the filter string contains the value.
Мanufacturers tend to name their option values in various ways. So my first idea was to use key part of words to categorize possible option values. But I realized that it's not a reliable way causing possible errors if option value takes more then buffer size or relates to both categories. For example, if "ADF Duplex" stays before "ADF" in option values list, duplex will always be used in ADF mode. So I switched back to comparing to whole well-known names.