Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] MR6776: d3dx9: D3DXSaveSurfaceToFileInMemory() improvements, part 1.

[Connor McAdams (＠cmcadams)]

On Sat Nov  9 01:43:08 2024 +0000, Matteo Bruni wrote:
> An option would be to collect all of that into an `expected` structure,
> which would be easier to handle (e.g. to pass the data to `check_dds_header()`).

I _think_ I've changed this to be more inline with what you've suggested, but I'll let you mark this as resolved to be sure.

If you meant to suggest having `check_dds_header()` take an `expected` structure as an argument, that gets kind of ugly if we're using that same function for tests outside of `test_save_surface_to_dds()`.