On Sat Jul 15 19:08:44 2023 +0000, Esme Povirk wrote:
I think this would be simpler with just the rbtree, so we don't have 2 different data structures that need to be kept consistent. Unless the order matters for some reason, the rbtree should be able to hold all the information.
This was mainly done to have a simpler implementation first prior to introducing the rbtree which feels a bit more complicated, but I see your point. I'll do that then.