On Thu Oct 5 13:54:37 2023 +0000, Nikolay Sivov wrote:
Yes, some comments are useful here. Regarding the name, it's not only for iterator part, it depends on a loop kind, so calling it WITH_ITER will make it even less accurate. The name should make it clear that it's some jump that's not going to survive for long, and is not useful by itself. Maybe append INTERNAL, or something similar? I'm definitely open to suggestions.
LOOP_CONTINUE is also questionable, because 'continue' does not belong anywhere else but loops.