Re: [PATCH 0/3] MR6922: Improve clang configuration.

[Alfred Agrell (＠Alcaro)]

On Mon Dec  2 14:50:40 2024 +0000, Jacek Caban wrote:
> With that logic in `winegcc`, I think we could skip `WINE_TRY_PE_CFLAGS`
> and just append to `*_LDFLAGS` unconditionally. It means that if the
> toolchain is not capable of adding handling it, the compilation will
> fail, but that seems justified for a feature that need to be explicitly
> enabled (and we can revisit that if we decide to change it changes;
> toolchains lacking it are mostly theoretical anyway).

Why is the second build-id on this line spelled with double dash?