Re: [PATCH v2 0/1] MR9090: ntdll: Use Mach COW for write watches support on macOS.

[Marc-Aurel Zent (＠mzent)]

On Thu Oct  2 18:31:25 2025 +0000, Tim Clem wrote:
> Is there a reason to do this page by page? Can you not just do one
> mach_vm_protect for the whole range?

I tried explaining the rationale behind this in a comment in v2 at that spot, since it is not immediately obvious why it is done this way.