13 Dec
2023
13 Dec
'23
9:54 p.m.
On Wed Dec 13 10:12:50 2023 +0000, Giovanni Mascellani wrote:
Could you also add a quick `[test]` for expected-successful shaders? Semantics should be obvious here, but I'm always braced for surprises...
If you feel strongly about it, I guess, but the point of most of these tests is to figure out what is the HLSL type of the result. I don't see what a [test] would demonstrate here, and it'd add some clutter.