On Fri Feb 14 16:04:50 2025 +0000, Rémi Bernon wrote:
I don't see any reason to use the fd cache for this, it's going to be retrieved only once and already going to be cached separately.
I added it because the fd *is* cacheable, so it's more correct from a certain point of view, but indeed it doesn't really matter whether we take advantage of the cache or not.