23 May
2025
23 May
'25
5:49 p.m.
On Fri May 23 17:42:41 2025 +0000, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
Since I don't have a working NTLM setup I was planning to use new code path only for Kerberos.
That would complicate sasl_decode() further, I don't think we want that. If we have NTLM support too we can actually simplify sasl_decode().