12 Apr
2023
12 Apr
'23
2:33 p.m.
On Wed Apr 12 12:09:30 2023 +0000, **** wrote:
Marvin replied on the mailing list:
Hi, It looks like your patch introduced the new failures shown below. Please investigate and fix them before resubmitting your patch. If they are not new, fixing them anyway would help a lot. Otherwise please ask for the known failures list to be updated. The tests also ran into some preexisting test failures. If you know how to fix them that would be helpful. See the TestBot job for the details: The full results can be found at: https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=131819 Your paranoid android. === debian11 (32 bit report) === ntdll: directory.c:164: Test failed: file L".": expected (null) (10), got 12 directory.c:164: Test failed: file L"..": expected (null) (10), got 12 === debian11 (32 bit zh:CN report) === ntdll: directory.c:164: Test failed: file L".": expected (null) (10), got 12 directory.c:164: Test failed: file L"..": expected (null) (10), got 12 === debian11b (64 bit WoW report) === ntdll: directory.c:164: Test failed: file L".": expected (null) (10), got 12 directory.c:164: Test failed: file L"..": expected (null) (10), got 12
will fix