On Wed Mar 27 08:58:20 2024 +0000, Jinoh Kang wrote:
Anyways I'm not strongly arguing for the info message. I'm merely suggesting a compromise. (As you might have noticed, I believe *in general* that we should *not* make Wine[^1] even harder to hack around with for someone who is not a CW employee or a long-time contributor. Not everyone agrees with this; you can say "if you seriously want to hack with Wine you should already read the entire codebase" and that wouldn't be entirely wrong. I'm just not sure if we (as a collective, not this MR in partiular) *really* want Wine project to be more open and friendly to new contributors, or not.) [^1]: Or more broadly, any complex open source software.
How is this making anything harder to hack around? WINEDEBUG is the only thing you need to know about when hacking Wine, this is making sure that it truly is, for a module that currently doesn't follow the usual Wine traces.