Re: [PATCH 0/7] MR6971: mshtml: Implement attribute nodes properly in IE9+ modes and prototype chain.

[Gabriel Ivăncescu (＠insn)]

On Fri Dec  6 16:25:59 2024 +0000, Gabriel Ivăncescu wrote:
> Won't splitting it introduce temporary regressions? Some of them will
> use gecko attributes, while the others will use mshtml attributes, and
> so will be out of sync?

Looks like IHTMLDOMNode is not an exposed interface in IE9+ either, even though it utilizes the methods from the node prototype, what should I do? Should I just mark it todo_wine for now?