Re: [PATCH v13 0/7] MR7: ntdll: Properly track refcount with forwarded exports.

[Jinoh Kang (＠iamahuman)]

On Tue Feb 18 23:58:22 2025 +0000, Paul Gofman wrote:
> > What does a DAG have to do with this? The dependency graph isn’t
>
> acyclic. It can’t be, since circular dependencies are allowed. We
> already create cycles for regular imports, so I don’t see why forward
> imports should be treated any differently.
> Not sure if that is directly related, but I think the idea is that
> modules with cyclic dependencies should exist in one DDAG node while
> there should not be cyclic dependencies between DDAG nodes. E. g.,
> user32, win32u and gdi32 get loaded in one DDAG node on Windows. This is
> currently not implemented and we always create a separate DDAG node for
> each module.

Rebased, `LDR_DONT_RESOLVE_REFS` test is no longer part of the patch after !7347.