Re: [PATCH v41 0/8] MR2808: SNI tray implementation

[Paul Gofman (＠gofman)]

On Fri Aug  9 17:25:37 2024 +0000, Rémi Bernon wrote:
> In the light of the discussions that happened around this, and given
> that SNI apparently requires a separate connection for every systray
> icon, I'd say that having DBus connections in wineserver is probably a
> good idea because it's already able to multiplex them right away. Then
> I'm not sure how well that idea of having DBus connections, and multiple
> of them in wineserver, will be received.

Well, it is maybe too specific for wineserver? And there are probably not so much systrays icons even on Windows, do we need such an optimization?