Re: [PATCH v2 0/1] MR3379: ntdll: Match Windows used block filling.

[Rémi Bernon (＠rbernon)]

On Tue Jul 25 16:24:01 2023 +0000, Paul Gofman wrote:
> I don't think that the test with 0xba matters too much, but it also
> seems to me that it is reliable. That is the high byte of
> BLOCK_FILL_USED (0xbaadf00d), and it gets there when the new block is
> allocated out of place and gets filled before 39 bytes are copied from
> the old location, so not a leftover from previous allocation at those
> addresses (testing those would be indeed flaky).

Ah indeed, I couldn't figure how it ended up there but I see now.