2 Mar
2025
2 Mar
'25
11:43 p.m.
On Sun Mar 2 23:43:14 2025 +0000, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
Please also mention what application requires this. We don't change things just to "follow the spec", particularly since there's no such thing as a spec for the Windows API.
Cashbooks. Ay? The specs I am referring to is that, (1) in C you cannot just deref a pointer unconditionally and (2) the MS doc [says as such](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/api/unknwn/nf-unknwn-iunknow...)) "If ppvObject (the address) is nullptr, then this method returns E_POINTER.". Why is every change purposed to this project meet with such adversarial attitude?