On Wed Oct 11 06:44:00 2023 +0000, Huw Davies wrote:
What I'm getting at is why don't we call this `MSTTSEngine.dll` rather than make up our own name?
Since this is a separate implementation of the `ISpTTSEngine`, the implementation is different and data fields under `Voices\Tokens` are different, it makes sense to distinguish it from `MSTTSEngine`. Just like the SAPI implementation of Amazon polly has its own separate dll.
Moreover, in theory `MSTTSEngine.dll` from windows can be installed alongside our own implementation (I haven't tested this).