Re: [PATCH v25 0/4] MR3504: ntdll: An implementation of SRWLOCK that closer matches Windows'.

[Yuxuan Shui (＠yshui)]

On Wed Sep 20 22:29:26 2023 +0000, Zebediah Figura wrote:
> This part I do hate, though. Do we really need srwlock_wake() to work
> without the spinlock held? We're already holding it in
> srwlock_maybe_wake() anyway...

Same reason as above.