Re: [PATCH 0/1] MR1367: ws2_32: Return success for setting SO_ERROR.

[Zebediah Figura (＠zfigura)]

On Mon Nov 14 23:09:22 2022 +0000, Alex Henrie wrote:
> I don't know of any "real-world" application that needs to set SO_ERROR
> and then read it back, but we do have a test for it, and implementing it
> properly would avoid a FIXME. It's fine if all you want is a stub, I
> just wanted to let you know that code to actually implement the option
> is there for the taking.

I recall replying in private, but I should have said so on the mailing list, so my apologies for that. In any case, I personally think actually implementing it is unnecessarily adding nontrivial code for no clear benefit.