3 Mar
2024
3 Mar
'24
4:39 p.m.
On Sun Mar 3 16:35:16 2024 +0000, Jinoh Kang wrote:
This patch lacks tests. The checks are too broad because it's smaller. Since it's broad, it affects cases that *aren't* affected by the bug. It's better to bump !667 instead. It tries to minimize impact on cases not affected by the bug (hence lowering risk of regressing other apps). Thanks.
Sure, we can bump 667. Though I have no idea why it stalled, since there are no opposing comments on it.