On Sat Mar 15 09:55:06 2025 +0000, llyyr wrote:
I completely disagree with the following point in the OP:
Similarly, **no diagnostic messages are provided to note that ntsync
is in use, or not in use**. These messages are part of esync/fsync, as well as part of ntsync "testing" trees unofficially distributed. However, if ntsync is working correctly, no message should be necessary. It's fine to not print any messages if ntsync is working properly, as users can just check with `lsof /dev/ntsync`, but diagnostic messages if ntsync _does_ fail to work should exist. It's a huge performance loss if Wine is using server side synchronization compared to ntsync, and a message telling the user that is is _not_ working will go a long way in getting bug reports for this or just making life easier debugging.
Well, I can't reproduce it. Latest version works fine for me on top of the mainline.