On Mon Feb 24 20:03:53 2025 +0000, Brendan McGrath wrote:
I don't think that it should be marked broken, no
I've redesigned the tests so we no longer need to mark any as broken. I also think they're a bit simpler now.
Actually - I just pushed a change small change. I was testing each pixel against the different implementations and counting any pixel that didn't pass all of them as an error.
But that has the same flaw as my previous tests. The color white could pass against the studio-range and black against full-range. So now I keep count of the pixels that don't pass studio-range vs don't pass full-range individually (ensuring we get a reasonable pass-rate on one or the other rather than a combination of both). This also resulted in the need to increase the tolerances slightly.