On Sun May 26 12:43:24 2024 +0000, Connor McAdams wrote:
changed this line in [version 2 of the diff](/wine/wine/-/merge_requests/5666/diffs?diff_id=115190&start_sha=04c51c5eac6f69386870f2ea96e616838cda38be#e5891b30c0f0a0d106394089d61a67281f349564_111_94)
Yeah in hindsight I think I might have been trying to make things more generic than was necessary. I've spent some time mapping it out and I think it can be done without callbacks. It might lead to some loop duplication, but I don't think that's the worst thing, and it will probably make the code clearer.
I've changed things around in the current revision, let me know what you think. :)