October 2010 - Wine-devel - list.winehq.org

Re: kernel32/process: Implement GetLogicalProcessorInformation (rewrite - try 3)
by Rudolf Mayerhofer 05 Oct '10

05 Oct '10

>I don't know much about kernel32/ntdll, but I'm pretty sure that you >could get this to work through ntdll. NtQuerySystemInformation with >SystemProcessorInformation/SystemLogicalProcessorInformation (see >http://undocumented.ntinternals.net/UserMode/Undocumented%20Functions/Syste…) >should help. http://native-nt-toolkit.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/ndk/extypes.h >(read, don't copy) seems to have a pretty exhaustive set of >definitions, but even that's not complete. Some tests for the NT >version would be useful. > >Mike. SystemLogicalProcessorInformation seems to be the right SystemClass for NtQuerySystemInformation. But here's the Problem. I don't have any idea how i could any information about the struct returned by calling NtQuerySystemInformation with SystemLogicalProcessorInformation (= 73). The only windows machine i have access to a the moment keeps throwing status 0xC0000005 (ACCESS_VIOLATION) at me which doesn't help at all and i'm pretty much stuck right now. If i could get my hands on the struct returned by NtQuerySystemInformation it should be easy to change the patch to do the parsing in ntdll and just call that from kernel32.

2 2

Re: [1/2] user32: fix FindWindowEx behavior if window name is an empty charachter
by Dmitry Timoshkov 05 Oct '10

05 Oct '10

Louis Lenders <xerox_xerox2000(a)yahoo.co.uk> wrote: > @@ -1756,6 +1756,10 @@ HWND WINAPI FindWindowExW( HWND parent, HWND child, LPCWSTR className, LPCWSTR t > { > while (list[i]) > { > + /* Handle special case where empty title bar or no title bar exists, so GetWindowsText would return NULL > + but if title is also an empty char we still have a match */ > + if (!GetWindowTextW( list[i], buffer, len + 1 ) && !title[0]) break; > + > if (GetWindowTextW( list[i], buffer, len + 1 ) && !strcmpiW( buffer, title )) break; > i++; > } It would be better to avoid duplicate GetWindowTextW() calls. -- Dmitry.

1 0

Re: psapi/tests: macro cleanup
by testbot＠testbot.winehq.org 05 Oct '10

05 Oct '10

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=5813 Your paranoid android. === WVISTAADM (32 bit psapi_main) === psapi_main.c:111: Test failed: cbNeeded=100 === W2K8SE (32 bit psapi_main) === psapi_main.c:111: Test failed: cbNeeded=100 === W7PRO (32 bit psapi_main) === psapi_main.c:111: Test failed: cbNeeded=96 === W7PROX64 (32 bit psapi_main) === psapi_main.c:111: Test failed: cbNeeded=108

1 0

Re: [PATCH] comctl32/tests: Add tests for negative subitems independent of local settings
by testbot＠testbot.winehq.org 05 Oct '10

05 Oct '10

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=5811 Your paranoid android. === W7PROX64 (64 bit listview) === listview.c:4449: Test failed: NM_HOVER allow test: the msg sequence is not complete: expected 0087 - actual 0000 listview.c:4454: Test failed: NM_HOVER block test: the msg sequence is not complete: expected 0087 - actual 0000

1 0

Re: [2/2] user32/tests: Test FindWindowEx for empty window title
by testbot＠testbot.winehq.org 05 Oct '10

05 Oct '10

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=5803 Your paranoid android. === W7PROX64 (32 bit win) === win.c:2684: Test failed: GetActiveWindow() = 00000000 win.c:2684: Test failed: GetFocus() = 00000000 win.c:2710: Test failed: GetActiveWindow() = 00000000 win.c:2710: Test failed: GetFocus() = 00000000 win.c:2769: Test failed: GetActiveWindow() = 00000000 win.c:2769: Test failed: GetFocus() = 00000000 === W7PROX64 (64 bit win) === win.c:2684: Test failed: GetActiveWindow() = 0000000000000000 win.c:2684: Test failed: GetFocus() = 0000000000000000 win.c:2710: Test failed: GetActiveWindow() = 0000000000000000 win.c:2710: Test failed: GetFocus() = 0000000000000000 win.c:2769: Test failed: GetActiveWindow() = 0000000000000000 win.c:2769: Test failed: GetFocus() = 0000000000000000

1 0

Re: [PATCH 2/3] urlmon: Added Abort tests.
by testbot＠testbot.winehq.org 05 Oct '10

05 Oct '10

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=5782 Your paranoid android. === W2K3R2SESP2 (32 bit protocol) === protocol.c:824: Test failed: hrResult = 800c0005, expected: 00000000 Timeout === WVISTAADM (32 bit protocol) === protocol.c:509: Test failed: unexpected call Switch

1 0

Re: [PATCH 3/3] urlmon: Added Abort support to BindProtocol.
by testbot＠testbot.winehq.org 05 Oct '10

05 Oct '10

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=5783 Your paranoid android. === WINEBUILD (build) === Patch failed

1 0

Re: include: Added d3d10_1.idl.
by Rico Schüller 04 Oct '10

04 Oct '10

Am 02.10.2010 15:29, schrieb Jacek Caban: +typedef enum D3D10_SRV_DIMENSION1 +{ + D3D10_1_SRV_DIMENSION_UNKNOWN = 0, ... + D3D10_1_SRV_DIMENSION_TEXTURECUBE = 9, + D3D10_1_SRV_DIMENSION_TEXTURECUBEARRAY = 10 +} D3D10_SRV_DIMENSION1; You probably might add those to d3dcommon.h and only add a typedef. It was changed in one of the sdks. Cheers Rico

2 2

Re: winspool.drv: return maximum possible size of the buffer when no buffer specified
by Alexandre Julliard 04 Oct '10

04 Oct '10

Vitaly Perov <vitperov(a)etersoft.ru> writes: > @@ -1398,7 +1398,7 @@ static void convert_printerinfo_W_to_A(LPBYTE out, LPBYTE pPrintersW, > dmA = DEVMODEdupWtoA(piW->pDevMode); > if (dmA) { > /* align DEVMODEA to a DWORD boundary */ > - len = (4 - ( (DWORD_PTR) ptr & 3)) & 3; > + len = ptr ? (4 - ( (DWORD_PTR) ptr & 3)) & 3 : 3; That doesn't make any sense. -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.org

2 1

Re: psapi/tests: remove an ugly macro
by testbot＠testbot.winehq.org 04 Oct '10

04 Oct '10

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=5776 Your paranoid android. === WVISTAADM (32 bit psapi_main) === psapi_main.c:116: Test failed: cbNeeded=100 === W2K8SE (32 bit psapi_main) === psapi_main.c:116: Test failed: cbNeeded=100 === W7PRO (32 bit psapi_main) === psapi_main.c:116: Test failed: cbNeeded=96 === W7PROX64 (32 bit psapi_main) === psapi_main.c:116: Test failed: cbNeeded=108

1 0