February 2010 - Wine-devel - list.winehq.org

Re: winhlp32: Impove Tab view [try 5]
by Nikolay Sivov 09 Feb '10

09 Feb '10

On 2/9/2010 20:57, Vladimir Pankratov wrote: > Hello all. > > changes since try 4: > changed buffer size to 257 > > Thanks to Nikolay Sivov. > + WCHAR wszSearchText[257]; /* Native uses only first 256 symbols + trailing \0 */ > That's not exactly what I meant. Native winhlp32 as I can see doesn't allow more than 256 characters to be typed in. So it's not the same as to ignore the rest.

1 0

Re: winhlp32: Improve Tab view [try 3]
by Nikolay Sivov 09 Feb '10

09 Feb '10

Replying with wine-devel, cause my gmail account reported failed delivery to Vladimir's mail address. You have a kind of forwarding or I don't know what. > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: Re: winhlp32: Improve Tab view [try 3] > Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2010 21:14:04 +0500 > From: Vladimir Pankratov <scriptkid(a)mail.ru> > Reply-To: scriptkid(a)mail.ru > To: Nikolay Sivov <bunglehead(a)gmail.com> > > > > You wrote: > > On 2/8/2010 16:59, Vladimir Pankratov wrote: > >> Hello all. > >> > >> changes since try 2: > >> removed files without IDD_INDEX dialog > >> + WCHAR wszText[255]; > >> > > Isn't it possible to use some defined name here? MAX_PATH probably. > AJ said: MAX_PATH doesn't make sense here, this is not a file name. What to do? > I was my guess only, about MAX_PATH, cause it's 260 and you used 255. What to do? Something I replied on previous try. You should figure out using native program how bigger this string could be and just use this length. If I got it right it's a kind of UI element you could easily access in native program too. Just type and count, that's all. After that put a constant and a comment that you verified it. P.S. Just checked. And it supports 256 characters, so you need 257 buffer I suppose.

1 0

Re: winhlp32: Improve Index tab [try 4][Resend]
by Alexandre Julliard 09 Feb '10

09 Feb '10

Vladimir Pankratov <scriptkid(a)mail.ru> writes: > Hello all. > > changes since try3: > changed variables size to MAX_PATH MAX_PATH doesn't make sense here, this is not a file name. -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.org

1 0

iPod synced with iTunes v7.6!
by Eric Badiere 09 Feb '10

09 Feb '10

Hello, Is there any site that can tell me what patches I need to apply to do this? At work I've been assigned the task of testing an iPhone app, and I run mint 8 on my laptop. I am no apple fan boy, so I am not planning on buying my own mac to do this, and I am trying to avoid windoze. Any help would be appreciated. Best Regards, Eric

2 1

problem with wine
by David Adam 09 Feb '10

09 Feb '10

Hello, since one month I have problem with Wine. With the wine-git or the Wine binary provided by Mandriva, since I try to launch any application I have the following message: [david(a)Thakur Téléchargement]$ wine t3_demo_uk.exe err:process:__wine_kernel_init boot event wait timed out err:seh:raise_exception Exception frame is not in stack limits => unable to dispatch exception. [david(a)Thakur Téléchargement]$ That happens for any application. Obviously, the application does not start. But for builtin application, everything is fine. For instance, wine notepad works fine. Any clue to fix my problem? A+ David

3 2

winetest now wants an email address
by Alexandre Julliard 08 Feb '10

08 Feb '10

Folks, As of today, winetest requires an email address to submit results to test.winehq.org. This is because it's often necessary to contact the submitter of a test to get more details, or to ask them to fix their setup, and it's often hard to guess the identity of the submitter from the tag name. If you are morally offended at the idea of your email showing up in the result log, you can use some obfuscated format, or use your real name or IRC nick if you are well-known around these parts. The important thing is that Wine developers must be able to get in touch with you easily. If you have some automated scripts submitting results, you'll need to fix them to pass a -m option to winetest. -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.org

2 1

Re: [1/3] d3dx9: Partial implementation of D3DXAssembleShader function. [try 3]
by James Mckenzie 08 Feb '10

08 Feb '10

>> Well, in 2010 I've only done little changes. The real development on >> this was in 2009. What's the policy in these cases? I believe I can >> put the 2010 safely. >I have seen people adjust the years for simple fixes, although I don't know if there is a formal >policy. Since your patches are going in now I guess anything from "2009", "2009, 2010" to "2010" is >warranted. > >Since most countries don't require a copyright notice any longer(although still recommend it) I guess >there is no real legal significance to the year. In most places copyright expiration doesn't depend on >the publication date but on the year of the death of the last surviving creator. > >IANAL, somebody who knows this better please correct me. > I thought that AJ only wanted a copyright notification if significant contributions were added. As to the date the format 2009-2010 would be most suitable in this case. James McKenzie

1 0

Re: [1/3] d3dx9: Partial implementation of D3DXAssembleShader function. [try 3]
by Stefan Dösinger 08 Feb '10

08 Feb '10

Am 08.02.2010 um 16:33 schrieb Matteo Bruni: > Other than the things Henri last mentioned, there are some more small > changes (make some struct const/static, whitespace fixes, remove some > useless cruft, ...) particularly in patches 2 and 3. > <0001-d3dx9-Partial-implementation-of-D3DXAssembleShader-fun.txt> Henri is on holidays this week(I think), here are 3 things I noticed: > + static const struct wpp_callbacks wpp_callbacks = { > + wpp_lookup_mem, > + wpp_open_mem, The placement of the { is not consistent with the rest of the patch (and the entire patch 1 is inconsistent with patch 2 and 3). It seems to me the predominant style in d3dx9 is the one used by patch 1, although there are some inconsistencies. > +void wpp_write_message(const char *fmt, va_list args) > +{ Unless I am missing some wpp magic here you can make this function(and others) static as well. > + * Copyright 2009 Matteo Bruni Maybe make this 2009-2010?

2 2

grrrrr
by Dan Kegel 08 Feb '10

08 Feb '10

http://www.pro-linux.de/NB3/news/1/15259/starmoney-stellt-linux-variante-ei… Looks like Star Money is blaming Wine for its troubles... IIRC, they switched to .net or something without asking whether it would work on Wine. Grr.

3 2

Re: winhlp32: Improve Index tab [try 4]
by Nikolay Sivov 08 Feb '10

08 Feb '10

On 2/8/2010 20:09, Vladimir Pankratov wrote: > Hello all. > > changes since try3: > changed variables size to MAX_PATH > Actually it was just a guess. It's better to try with native and limit Edit accordingly, after that you could query for its length or use static buffer of the same limit. > Thanks to all

1 0