June 2011 - Wine-devel - list.winehq.org

CD-ROM ioctl support on MacOS?
by Joerg-Cyril.Hoehle＠t-systems.com 06 Jun '11

06 Jun '11

Hi, what's the state of CD-ROM support on the Mac? ntdll/cdrom.c contains quite a few #ifdef apple. I'm asking because the mcicda currently uses these ioctl: 1. READ_RAW 2. READ_TOC 3. READ_Q -> POSITION MCICDA could be changed to avoid the third one entirely -- when using the dsound output. Would that be enough to use mcicda on MacOS to play music? Thanks for your help, Jörg Höhle

2 3

Re: dinput: Added a check for NULL callback in EnumDevices.
by Vitaliy Margolen 05 Jun '11

05 Jun '11

On 06/03/2011 04:19 PM, Lucas Fialho Zawacki wrote: > In the absence of this check apps passing a NULL pointer as callback to > EnumDevices segfault under Wine. Do you have an example of such application? And the bug in bugzilla? Vitaliy.

3 5

Re: urlmon: Fix incorrect pointer arithmetic (too conversative) in map_url_to_zone. (RESEND)
by Joris Huizer 05 Jun '11

05 Jun '11

On 06/04/2011 03:02 PM, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > Resending: This really looks like a straightforward bug fix and the > current code definitely wrong??? > > > The difference between two pointers (of the same type) is the number > of elements, not the number of bytes. Thus the code below was way > incorrect, luckily only too conversative. > > Gerald > > --- > dlls/urlmon/sec_mgr.c | 2 +- > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/dlls/urlmon/sec_mgr.c b/dlls/urlmon/sec_mgr.c > index 7b4bb35..75850ee 100644 > --- a/dlls/urlmon/sec_mgr.c > +++ b/dlls/urlmon/sec_mgr.c > @@ -529,7 +529,7 @@ static HRESULT map_url_to_zone(LPCWSTR url, DWORD *zone, LPWSTR *ret_url) > hres = CoInternetParseUrl(secur_url, PARSE_PATH_FROM_URL, 0, path, > sizeof(path)/sizeof(WCHAR),&size, 0); > > - if(SUCCEEDED(hres)&& (ptr = strchrW(path, '\\'))&& ptr-path< sizeof(root)/sizeof(WCHAR)) { > + if(SUCCEEDED(hres)&& (ptr = strchrW(path, '\\'))&& ptr-path< sizeof(root)) { > UINT type; > > memcpy(root, path, (ptr-path)*sizeof(WCHAR)); Indeed, the difference between two pointers is the number of elements. sizeof(root) is the number of bytes, sizeof(root)/sizeof(WCHAR) is the number of elements. HTH, Joris

1 0

re: cmd: ensure create_full_path returns FALSE for all errors
by Dan Kegel 05 Jun '11

05 Jun '11

Please add a test case, too.

2 6

Re: urlmon: Fix incorrect pointer arithmetic (too conversative) in map_url_to_zone. (RESEND)
by Ken Thomases 05 Jun '11

05 Jun '11

On Jun 4, 2011, at 8:02 AM, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > Resending: This really looks like a straightforward bug fix and the > current code definitely wrong??? No. As others have pointed out, your logic is wrong. The existing code is correct. > The difference between two pointers (of the same type) is the number > of elements, not the number of bytes. Thus the code below was way > incorrect, luckily only too conversative. So, ptr-path is the number of elements between the two pointers. But sizeof(root) is a number of bytes. The precise reason to divide the latter by sizeof(WCHAR) is to arrive at a number of elements so it is proper to compare to ptr-path. Put another way, look a bit lower in the code: > memcpy(root, path, (ptr-path)*sizeof(WCHAR)); It is clear that (ptr-path)*sizeof(WCHAR), a measure of bytes, must be no larger than the size of root in bytes. Thus, this is the requirement: (ptr-path)*sizeof(WCHAR) <= sizeof(root) Dividing both sides by sizeof(WCHAR) gives an equivalent requirement: (ptr-path) <= sizeof(root)/sizeof(WCHAR) which is exactly what the code, as is, tests. (Except that the current code doesn't allow for the equal case, in order to preserve a null terminator.) Regards, Ken > --- > dlls/urlmon/sec_mgr.c | 2 +- > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/dlls/urlmon/sec_mgr.c b/dlls/urlmon/sec_mgr.c > index 7b4bb35..75850ee 100644 > --- a/dlls/urlmon/sec_mgr.c > +++ b/dlls/urlmon/sec_mgr.c > @@ -529,7 +529,7 @@ static HRESULT map_url_to_zone(LPCWSTR url, DWORD *zone, LPWSTR *ret_url) > hres = CoInternetParseUrl(secur_url, PARSE_PATH_FROM_URL, 0, path, > sizeof(path)/sizeof(WCHAR), &size, 0); > > - if(SUCCEEDED(hres) && (ptr = strchrW(path, '\\')) && ptr-path < sizeof(root)/sizeof(WCHAR)) { > + if(SUCCEEDED(hres) && (ptr = strchrW(path, '\\')) && ptr-path < sizeof(root)) { > UINT type; > > memcpy(root, path, (ptr-path)*sizeof(WCHAR)); > -- > 1.7.4.1 > > >

1 0

Re: Added unbound sampler test for pixel shaders. (try 2)
by Henri Verbeet 05 Jun '11

05 Jun '11

Testing 3D and Cube textures (provided they're supported) may be useful too.

1 0

re: gdi speed: 10x slower than real win
by Dan Kegel 05 Jun '11

05 Jun '11

Yup. It's being worked on, slowly; see http://wiki.winehq.org/Performance, especially http://wiki.winehq.org/DIBEngine

1 0

Re: [1/8] d3d8: Use D3DPOOL <-> WINED3DPOOL enum conversion functions instead of implicit conversions (clang)
by Alexandre Julliard 05 Jun '11

05 Jun '11

Frédéric Delanoy <frederic.delanoy(a)gmail.com> writes: > +static inline D3DPOOL d3dpool_from_wined3dpool(WINED3DPOOL type) > +{ > + switch (type) > + { > + case WINED3DPOOL_DEFAULT: return D3DPOOL_DEFAULT; > + case WINED3DPOOL_MANAGED: return D3DPOOL_MANAGED; > + case WINED3DPOOL_SYSTEMMEM: return D3DPOOL_SYSTEMMEM; > + case WINED3DPOOL_SCRATCH: return D3DPOOL_SCRATCH; > + case WINED3DPOOL_FORCE_DWORD: return D3DPOOL_FORCE_DWORD; > + } > + return (D3DPOOL) type; > +} > + > +static inline WINED3DPOOL wined3dpool_from_d3dpool(D3DPOOL type) > +{ > + switch (type) > + { > + case D3DPOOL_DEFAULT: return WINED3DPOOL_DEFAULT; > + case D3DPOOL_MANAGED: return WINED3DPOOL_MANAGED; > + case D3DPOOL_SYSTEMMEM: return WINED3DPOOL_SYSTEMMEM; > + case D3DPOOL_SCRATCH: return WINED3DPOOL_SCRATCH; > + case D3DPOOL_FORCE_DWORD: return WINED3DPOOL_FORCE_DWORD; > + } > + return (WINED3DPOOL) type; > +} I still don't see the point of that kind of switch statement. To be honest I don't see either why we even need different enum types in the first place. -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.org

4 7

gdi speed: 10x slower than real win
by Jarek Czekalski 04 Jun '11

04 Jun '11

Hi Devels The app I use runs unacceptably slow under wine. I suspected gdi routines and wrote a simple win32 api app to make some tests and comparisons. On my box it shows wine gdi is 10 times slower than the real windows. Let's get into details. REASON I love EditPad Pro (appdb editpad pro <http://appdb.winehq.org/objectManager.php?sClass=application&iId=8392>), a text editor with the capabilities for a programmer that I can't find in any other tool. After upgrade from version 6 to 7 I have problems with the usability, due to slow performance. The app is written in Delphi and now they included new interface features. The menus seem to be animated, they roll down instead of popping up immediately. Menus roll down slowly on wine, but that's a little problem, just a noticable thing. I have problems with very typing characters and these problems are almost gone when I switch off all the toolbars. Looks like the icons on them make them slow down the whole app. The author of the app claims that on his vmwared ubuntu everything is ok. I hope to get the judgement from you. TESTING APP I attach zip with source code and the executable of a short win32 api. It's an animated rectangle, optionally with a bitmap inside. It moves pixel by pixel from left to right. The next move is generated by PostMessage(WM_USER) at the end of OnPaint. I hope that's a way of assessing the gdi speed. Time needed to make the full pass of 500 pixels is printed on the screen. RESULTS test_gdi.exe without parameters draws bitmapped rect, while with the option "t" - the rect is bare. I tested 3 evironments and took 2 measurings on each of them. First number is the bitmapped time. Units are seconds. wine 0.39 0.22 - every movement phase is drawn vmwared w2k 0.123 0.085 - only several painted rects in random places w2k 0.0387 0.0285 - several painted every 2nd line, skewed rects The factor of 10 comes from comparing bitmapped time between wine and real W2K. Wine graphics is perfect, and the faster environments take some shorter ways. POSSIBLE EXPLANATION Just my imagination. I guess Windows buffer their graphics outcome in memory. Fast changes in this memory are not passed to the graphic device. This would explain the artifacts seen in the experiment and also the lack of flickering of the apps under the real win. For example mentioned EditPadPro redraws its edit area with every character typed (at least in the syntax highlighting mode), while under real win this behaviour is undetectable. BIBLIOGRAPHY The speed issue was reviewed in such posts I could locate: GDI Question <http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/2003-February/014052.html> (2003) Windows 2D GDI benchmark tools? <http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/2009-July/077144.html> (2009) Speed problem with Wine... <http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-users/2001-July/007320.html> (2001) Has anything changed? LAST WORD I hope you'll benefit from the tester I wrote. I'm looking forward to see your comments. Do you notice the same speed multiplier as me: 10x? Maybe I have to fix my Debian to reach better results. Jarek

1 0

Re: wined3d: Enable blit stretching for 64 bpp
by Roderick Colenbrander 04 Jun '11

04 Jun '11

Hi André, I'm not sure if we should add this change since for a part it hides the real problem. Sure this patch likely works, but >32bpp blits should never enter the software rendering code in the first place. The code used to be a huge mess and Henri cleaned it up quite a bit already (thanks, because I became too busy). It may be easier now to fix this properly. Roderick 2011/6/4 André Hentschel <nerv(a)dawncrow.de>: > For http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27377 > --- > dlls/wined3d/surface.c | 3 +++ > 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/dlls/wined3d/surface.c b/dlls/wined3d/surface.c > index 91b16a6..7f9d9df 100644 > --- a/dlls/wined3d/surface.c > +++ b/dlls/wined3d/surface.c > @@ -6780,6 +6780,9 @@ do { \ > case 4: > STRETCH_ROW(DWORD); > break; > + case 8: > + STRETCH_ROW(DWORD64); > + break; > case 3: > { > const BYTE *s; > -- > > Best Regards, André Hentschel > > >

1 0