November 2012 - Wine-devel - list.winehq.org

Re: [PATCH 1/5] mstask: Implement ITaskScheduler_GetTargetComputer
by Alexandre Julliard 05 Nov '12

05 Nov '12

Detlef Riekenberg <wine.dev(a)web.de> writes: > @@ -28,6 +28,22 @@ typedef struct > LONG ref; > } TaskSchedulerImpl; > > +static LPWSTR get_unc_computername(void) > +{ > + static WCHAR buffer[MAX_COMPUTERNAME_LENGTH + 3]; /* extra space for two '\' and a zero */ > + DWORD len = MAX_COMPUTERNAME_LENGTH + 1; /* extra space for the zero */ > + > + if (*buffer) > + return buffer; > + > + if (!GetComputerNameW(buffer + 2, &len)) > + return NULL; > + > + buffer[1] = '\\'; > + buffer[0] = '\\'; > + return buffer; > +} You don't need a static buffer. -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.org

1 0

Re: [PATCH 5/7] server: Store and return security attributes with extended file attributes (try 2).
by Marvin 04 Nov '12

04 Nov '12

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=22726 Your paranoid android. === W2KPROSP4 (32 bit security) === security.c:4417: Test failed: Current User ACE has unexpected flags (0x1f01ff != 0x03) security.c:4428: Test failed: Administators Group ACE has unexpected flags (0x10000000 != 0x03) === WXPPROSP3 (32 bit security) === security.c:4417: Test failed: Current User ACE has unexpected flags (0x1f01ff != 0x03) security.c:4428: Test failed: Administators Group ACE has unexpected flags (0x1f01ff != 0x03) === W2K3R2SESP2 (32 bit security) === security.c:4417: Test failed: Current User ACE has unexpected flags (0x1f01ff != 0x03) security.c:4428: Test failed: Administators Group ACE has unexpected flags (0x1f01ff != 0x03) === WVISTAADM (32 bit security) === security.c:4417: Test failed: Current User ACE has unexpected flags (0x1f01ff != 0x03) security.c:4428: Test failed: Administators Group ACE has unexpected flags (0x1f01ff != 0x03) === W2K8SE (32 bit security) === security.c:4417: Test failed: Current User ACE has unexpected flags (0x1f01ff != 0x03) security.c:4428: Test failed: Administators Group ACE has unexpected flags (0x1f01ff != 0x03) === W7PRO (32 bit security) === security.c:4417: Test failed: Current User ACE has unexpected flags (0x1f01ff != 0x03) security.c:4428: Test failed: Administators Group ACE has unexpected flags (0x1f01ff != 0x03) === W7PROX64 (32 bit security) === security.c:4417: Test failed: Current User ACE has unexpected flags (0x1f01ff != 0x03) security.c:4428: Test failed: Administators Group ACE has unexpected flags (0x1f01ff != 0x03) === TEST64_W7SP1 (32 bit security) === security.c:4417: Test failed: Current User ACE has unexpected flags (0x1f01ff != 0x03) security.c:4428: Test failed: Administators Group ACE has unexpected flags (0x1f01ff != 0x03) === W7PROX64 (64 bit security) === security.c:4417: Test failed: Current User ACE has unexpected flags (0x1f01ff != 0x03) security.c:4428: Test failed: Administators Group ACE has unexpected flags (0x1f01ff != 0x03) === TEST64_W7SP1 (64 bit security) === security.c:4417: Test failed: Current User ACE has unexpected flags (0x1f01ff != 0x03) security.c:4428: Test failed: Administators Group ACE has unexpected flags (0x1f01ff != 0x03)

1 0

Re: [PATCH 3/7] advapi: Implement GetNamedSecurityInfoW on top of GetSecurityInfo (try 2).
by Marvin 04 Nov '12

04 Nov '12

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=22724 Your paranoid android. === W2KPROSP4 (32 bit security) === security.c:4417: Test failed: Current User ACE has unexpected flags (0x1f01ff != 0x03) security.c:4429: Test failed: Administators Group ACE has unexpected flags (0x10000000 != 0x03) === WXPPROSP3 (32 bit security) === security.c:4417: Test failed: Current User ACE has unexpected flags (0x1f01ff != 0x03) security.c:4429: Test failed: Administators Group ACE has unexpected flags (0x1f01ff != 0x03) === W2K3R2SESP2 (32 bit security) === security.c:4417: Test failed: Current User ACE has unexpected flags (0x1f01ff != 0x03) security.c:4429: Test failed: Administators Group ACE has unexpected flags (0x1f01ff != 0x03) === WVISTAADM (32 bit security) === security.c:4417: Test failed: Current User ACE has unexpected flags (0x1f01ff != 0x03) security.c:4429: Test failed: Administators Group ACE has unexpected flags (0x1f01ff != 0x03) === W2K8SE (32 bit security) === security.c:4417: Test failed: Current User ACE has unexpected flags (0x1f01ff != 0x03) security.c:4429: Test failed: Administators Group ACE has unexpected flags (0x1f01ff != 0x03) === W7PRO (32 bit security) === security.c:4417: Test failed: Current User ACE has unexpected flags (0x1f01ff != 0x03) security.c:4429: Test failed: Administators Group ACE has unexpected flags (0x1f01ff != 0x03) === W7PROX64 (32 bit security) === security.c:4417: Test failed: Current User ACE has unexpected flags (0x1f01ff != 0x03) security.c:4429: Test failed: Administators Group ACE has unexpected flags (0x1f01ff != 0x03) === TEST64_W7SP1 (32 bit security) === security.c:4417: Test failed: Current User ACE has unexpected flags (0x1f01ff != 0x03) security.c:4429: Test failed: Administators Group ACE has unexpected flags (0x1f01ff != 0x03) === W7PROX64 (64 bit security) === security.c:4417: Test failed: Current User ACE has unexpected flags (0x1f01ff != 0x03) security.c:4429: Test failed: Administators Group ACE has unexpected flags (0x1f01ff != 0x03) === TEST64_W7SP1 (64 bit security) === security.c:4417: Test failed: Current User ACE has unexpected flags (0x1f01ff != 0x03) security.c:4429: Test failed: Administators Group ACE has unexpected flags (0x1f01ff != 0x03)

1 0

Re: [PATCH 6/7] ntdll: Inherit security attributes from parent directories.
by Marvin 04 Nov '12

04 Nov '12

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=22708 Your paranoid android. === WNT4WSSP6 (32 bit directory) === Timeout

1 0

Re: [PATCH 5/7] server: Store and return security attributes with extended file attributes.
by Marvin 04 Nov '12

04 Nov '12

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=22707 Your paranoid android. === WNT4WSSP6 (32 bit directory) === Timeout

1 0

Re: [PATCH 5/7] server: Store and return security attributes with extended file attributes.
by Marvin 04 Nov '12

04 Nov '12

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=22706 Your paranoid android. === WNT4WSSP6 (32 bit security) === Timeout === W2KPROSP4 (32 bit security) === security.c:4411: Test failed: GetAclInformation returned unexpected entry count (5 != 2). security.c:4429: Test failed: Administators Group ACE != Administators Group SID. security.c:4432: Test failed: Administators Group ACE has unexpected mask (0x10000000 != 0x1f01ff) === WXPPROSP3 (32 bit security) === security.c:4411: Test failed: GetAclInformation returned unexpected entry count (6 != 2). === W2K3R2SESP2 (32 bit security) === security.c:4411: Test failed: GetAclInformation returned unexpected entry count (5 != 2). === WVISTAADM (32 bit security) === security.c:4411: Test failed: GetAclInformation returned unexpected entry count (6 != 2). === W2K8SE (32 bit security) === security.c:4411: Test failed: GetAclInformation returned unexpected entry count (5 != 2). === W7PRO (32 bit security) === security.c:4411: Test failed: GetAclInformation returned unexpected entry count (6 != 2). === W7PROX64 (32 bit security) === security.c:4411: Test failed: GetAclInformation returned unexpected entry count (6 != 2). === TEST64_W7SP1 (32 bit security) === security.c:4411: Test failed: GetAclInformation returned unexpected entry count (6 != 2). === W7PROX64 (64 bit security) === security.c:4411: Test failed: GetAclInformation returned unexpected entry count (6 != 2). === TEST64_W7SP1 (64 bit security) === security.c:4411: Test failed: GetAclInformation returned unexpected entry count (6 != 2).

1 0

Re: [PATCH 4/7] server: Create directories with the specified security attributes.
by Marvin 04 Nov '12

04 Nov '12

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=22705 Your paranoid android. === WNT4WSSP6 (32 bit directory) === Timeout

1 0

Re: [PATCH 3/7] advapi: Implement GetNamedSecurityInfoW on top of GetSecurityInfo.
by Marvin 04 Nov '12

04 Nov '12

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=22704 Your paranoid android. === WNT4WSSP6 (32 bit security) === Timeout === W2KPROSP4 (32 bit security) === security.c:4411: Test failed: GetAclInformation returned unexpected entry count (5 != 2). security.c:4429: Test failed: Administators Group ACE != Administators Group SID. security.c:4432: Test failed: Administators Group ACE has unexpected mask (0x10000000 != 0x1f01ff) === WXPPROSP3 (32 bit security) === security.c:4411: Test failed: GetAclInformation returned unexpected entry count (6 != 2). === W2K3R2SESP2 (32 bit security) === security.c:4411: Test failed: GetAclInformation returned unexpected entry count (5 != 2). === WVISTAADM (32 bit security) === security.c:4411: Test failed: GetAclInformation returned unexpected entry count (6 != 2). === W2K8SE (32 bit security) === security.c:4411: Test failed: GetAclInformation returned unexpected entry count (5 != 2). === W7PRO (32 bit security) === security.c:4411: Test failed: GetAclInformation returned unexpected entry count (6 != 2). === W7PROX64 (32 bit security) === security.c:4411: Test failed: GetAclInformation returned unexpected entry count (6 != 2). === TEST64_W7SP1 (32 bit security) === security.c:4411: Test failed: GetAclInformation returned unexpected entry count (6 != 2). === W7PROX64 (64 bit security) === security.c:4411: Test failed: GetAclInformation returned unexpected entry count (6 != 2). === TEST64_W7SP1 (64 bit security) === security.c:4411: Test failed: GetAclInformation returned unexpected entry count (6 != 2).

1 0

VBSCRIPT.DLL errors with CorelDRAW 12 installer (Wine 1.5.15)
by Gerold Jens Wucherpfennig 03 Nov '12

03 Nov '12

(I just bought Windows 8, so in return I want to spend some time and money to wine...) Hi, can someone help me with CorelDRAW 12: http://appdb.winehq.org/objectManager.php?sClass=version&iId=2390&iTestingI… Wine 1.5.15 vanilla without external DLLs Output from setup.exe in output.txt (only uniq lines saved; error code 67 on exit) vbscript errors (lines copied from output.txt): fixme:vbscript:parse_script parser failed on parsing L"1\r\nConst msiInstallStateAdvertise = 1\r\nConst msiInstallStateAbsent = 2\r\nConst msiInstallStateLocal = 3\r\nConst msiInstallStateSource = 4\r\nConst msiInstallStateDefault = 5\r\nDim nRemoveVBAEN:nRemoveVBAEN = 0\r\nDim nRemoveVBACZ:nRemoveVBACZ = 0\r\nDim nRemoveVBANL:nRemoveVBAPL = 0\r\n\r\nOn "... fixme:vbscript:parse_script parser failed on parsing L"1\r\nConst msiInstallStateAdvertise = 1\r\nConst msiInstallStateAbsent = 2\r\nConst msiInstallStateLocal = 3\r\nConst msiInstallStateSource = 4\r\nConst msiInstallStateDefault = 5\r\nDim nRemoveVBAEN:nRemoveVBAEN = 0\r\nDim nRemoveVBACZ:nRemoveVBACZ = 0\r\nDim nRemoveVBANL:nRemoveVBAPL = 0\r\n\r\nOn "... fixme:vbscript:parse_script parser failed on parsing L"1\r\nConst msiInstallStateAdvertise = 1\r\nConst msiInstallStateAbsent = 2\r\nConst msiInstallStateLocal = 3\r\nConst msiInstallStateSource = 4\r\nConst msiInstallStateDefault = 5\r\n\r\nOn Error Resume Next\r\n\r\nIf (IsFeatureSelected(\"FontNav\") = True) Then\r\n If ((Session.Property(\"PLLANG\""... fixme:vbscript:parse_script parser failed on parsing L"1\r\nConst msiInstallStateAdvertise = 1\r\nConst msiInstallStateAbsent = 2\r\nConst msiInstallStateLocal = 3\r\nConst msiInstallStateSource = 4\r\nConst msiInstallStateDefault = 5\r\n\r\nOn Error Resume Next\r\n\r\nIf (IsFeatureSelected(\"FontNav\") = True) Then\r\n If ((Session.Property(\"PLLANG\""... fixme:vbscript:parse_script parser failed on parsing L"1\r\nConst msiInstallStateAdvertise = 1\r\nConst msiInstallStateAbsent = 2\r\nConst msiInstallStateLocal = 3\r\nConst msiInstallStateSource = 4\r\nConst msiInstallStateDefault = 5\r\n\r\nOn Error Resume Next\r\n\t\r\nIf (IsFeatureExists(\"LocalInstallsOnly\")=\"1\") Then\r\n\tIf ((Session.Property(\""... Best Regards, Gerold

2 3

re: ntdll: Fixed some heap allocation stalls
by Dan Kegel 03 Nov '12

03 Nov '12

Which game were you testing?

4 3