June 2005 - Wine-Bugs - list.winehq.org

[Bug 2855] Install problem
by Wine Bugs June 2, 2005

June 2, 2005

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2855 tony_lambregts(a)telusplanet.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- URL| |http://appdb.winehq.org/appv | |iew.php?appId=2167 -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

1 0

[Bug 2978] 16-bit application (WinLED) deadlocks due to changes in initialisation of BIOS and SYSTEM information
by Wine Bugs June 2, 2005

June 2, 2005

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2978 saulius.krasuckas(a)elst.vtu.lt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |INVALID ------- Additional Comments From saulius.krasuckas(a)elst.vtu.lt 2005-02-06 14:04 ------- This bug is no longer valid, as the app now crashes (with a different backtrace). I am going to create new bug report on this crash. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

1 0

[Bug 3030] LivePerson software refuses to run..
by Wine Bugs June 2, 2005

June 2, 2005

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3030 ------- Additional Comments From kevin.kane(a)gmail.com 2005-02-06 13:46 ------- Created an attachment (id=913) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=913&action=view) full dump of wine output, including debug Also, i just noticed my link is bad.. www.liveperson.com.. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

1 0

[Bug 3030] New: LivePerson software refuses to run..
by Wine Bugs June 2, 2005

June 2, 2005

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3030 Summary: LivePerson software refuses to run.. Product: Wine Version: 20050419 Platform: PC OS/Version: other Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: wine-binary AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: kevin.kane(a)gmail.com A free demo of liveperson can be obtained at www.liverperson.com. Here is the following output from wine. Invoking /usr/bin/wine .wine/drive_c/Program Files/LivePerson/hc.exe ... fixme:ole:CoRegisterMessageFilter stub fixme:ole:RegisterTypeLib Registering non-oleautomation interface! fixme:ole:RegisterTypeLib Registering non-oleautomation interface! fixme:ole:ITypeInfo_fnRelease destroy child objects fixme:ole:ITypeInfo_fnRelease destroy child objects fixme:ole:ITypeInfo_fnRelease destroy child objects err:rebar:REBAR_AdjustBands Phase 1 failed, x=281, maxx=0, start=0, end=0 fixme:rebar:REBAR_MaximizeBand (uBand = 0 fIdeal = FALSE) case not coded err:rebar:REBAR_AdjustBands Phase 1 failed, x=485, maxx=0, start=0, end=0 err:rebar:REBAR_AdjustBands Phase 1 failed, x=475, maxx=0, start=0, end=0 fixme:rebar:REBAR_MaximizeBand (uBand = 0 fIdeal = FALSE) case not coded err:rebar:REBAR_AdjustBands Phase 1 failed, x=463, maxx=0, start=0, end=0 fixme:ole:CoCreateInstance no classfactory created for CLSID {4955dd33-b159-11d0-8fcf-00aa006bcc59}, hres is 0x80040154 err:ole:TLB_ReadTypeLib Loading of typelib L"stdole2.tlb" failed with error 126 err:ole:TLB_ReadTypeLib Loading of typelib L"stdole2.tlb" failed with error 126 err:ole:ITypeInfo_fnInvoke did not find member id fffffdfa, flags 4! err:ole:TLB_ReadTypeLib Loading of typelib L"stdole2.tlb" failed with error 126 err:ole:TLB_ReadTypeLib Loading of typelib L"stdole2.tlb" failed with error 126 err:ole:ITypeInfo_fnInvoke did not find member id fffffdfb, flags 4! wine: Unhandled exception (thread 0025), starting debugger... -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

1 0

[Bug 3002] problems writting to serial ports on 2005-05-24 release
by Wine Bugs June 2, 2005

June 2, 2005

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3002 ------- Additional Comments From dclark(a)akamail.com 2005-02-06 11:23 ------- The VXD problems with running under Win98 are common, and it is very unlikely that anyone will attempt to fix this. My understanding is that a fix would require someone to implement pedrv.vxd, which is unlikely to happen. When run under WinNT variants, the program does not use the VXD (because the WinNT variants do not allow it), so that particular problem goes away. I assume you mean that the program works with: cvs update -D "2005-01-14 CDT" and is broken with cvs update -D "2005-01-15 CDT" If som then it means one of the CVS commits on the 14th broke the application. Browsing through the commits on that day doesn't give an obvious candidate. I don't know where the message "wine client error" comes from. So since you are now an expert on CVS updates, how about narrowing it down to a particular patch? I know it is tedious, but you are almost there ;) The guide to CVS regression testing talks about how to do that, but in brief, go to the page: http://www.winehq.org/hypermail/wine-cvs/2005/01/index.html Those are the CVS commits for January. Go down to the 14th and pick a patch roughly in the middle. For example, it looks to my like the one with the time stamp of "Fri Jan 14 2005 - 10:09:34 CST" is roughly in the middle. So I would execute the command: cvs update -D "2005-01-15 10:09:00CST" Since the January patches use the "CST" timezone, be sure to use that when running CVS or the results will be confusing. You can then shift the time back and forth to find the exact patch that caused the problem. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

1 0

[Bug 2904] MUSHClient 3.65 crashes on wine20050419, but worked previous to that
by Wine Bugs June 2, 2005

June 2, 2005

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2904 Speeddymon(a)gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Resolution|DUPLICATE | ------- Additional Comments From Speeddymon(a)gmail.com 2005-02-06 07:17 ------- Marcus, I'm not sure this is a dupe of 2929. There was no information that pointed to bug 2929, and in fact, 2929's summary is a lil different from the error being caused here. The cause of this is the richedit bug introduced between march and april, I have no idea what caused 2929.. Reopening, as this has not been resolved. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

1 0

[Bug 3029] network app (SBClient) uses all CPU (2/3 sys, 1/3 user) unaccounted
by Wine Bugs June 2, 2005

June 2, 2005

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3029 ------- Additional Comments From leon-wine-bugzilla(a)cyberknights.com.au 2005-02-06 05:21 ------- SBClient version 5.3.7.371, Mandrake Linux 10.2/2005LE. SBClient is now owned by IBM, used to be called System Builder Plus or SBTech, it enhances multi-value database terminal access, in this case to RainingData's D3. I can set up ssh shell access to a test machine (at the wrong end of a 1500/256kb ADSL line) for testers if required. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

1 0

[Bug 3029] New: network app (SBClient) uses all CPU (2/3 sys, 1/3 user) unaccounted
by Wine Bugs June 2, 2005

June 2, 2005

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3029 Summary: network app (SBClient) uses all CPU (2/3 sys, 1/3 user) unaccounted Product: Wine Version: 20050419 Platform: PC OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: major Priority: P2 Component: wine-net AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: leon-wine-bugzilla(a)cyberknights.com.au While SBClient is doing network access, the CPU pegs and the app (the whole machine) runs very slowly, returning maybe one keystroke every 4-5 seconds for a LAN (100baseT) Telnet connection. None of the CPU time is accounted to any processes, it just sends the load average through the ceiling. Anything not involving network access (i.e. sitting at a prompt or waiting at a menu before starting the network connection) operates normally. Swapping MSVCRT to builtin doesn't seem to help. Downloading and installing a different native MSVCRT.DLL doesn't either. If you want debugging info or whatever, please ask. The only normal output is this line: $ wine sbclient.exe fixme:ole:CoCreateInstance no classfactory created for CLSID {ce9a1380-cc8d-11d2-9961-00a0c9b7589d}, hres is 0x80040154 -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

1 0

[Bug 2838] buzz tracker - Unhandled exception
by Wine Bugs June 2, 2005

June 2, 2005

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2838 ------- Additional Comments From marcus(a)jet.franken.de 2005-02-06 02:44 ------- can you try again with current CVS, if possible run with WINEDEBUG=+audio,+wave wine c:\\buzz\\buzz.exe -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

1 0

[Bug 2886] Broken Link
by Wine Bugs June 2, 2005

June 2, 2005

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2886 marcus(a)jet.franken.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED ------- Additional Comments From marcus(a)jet.franken.de 2005-02-06 02:42 ------- submitted a patch against the website cvs to fix. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

1 0