September 2024 - Wine-Bugs - list.winehq.org

[Bug 43383] New: valgrind shows several definite leak in dlls/qcap/tests/ smartteefilter.c
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org Aug. 28, 2026

Aug. 28, 2026

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43383 Bug ID: 43383 Summary: valgrind shows several definite leak in dlls/qcap/tests/smartteefilter.c Product: Wine Version: 2.12 Hardware: x86 OS: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: download, source, testcase, valgrind Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: qcap Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: austinenglish(a)gmail.com Distribution: Gentoo ==31520== 72 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 321 of 616 ==31520== at 0x7BC51061: notify_alloc (heap.c:254) ==31520== by 0x7BC5554F: RtlAllocateHeap (heap.c:1716) ==31520== by 0x4F1442B: IMalloc_fnAlloc (ifs.c:187) ==31520== by 0x4F14CCB: IMalloc_Alloc (objidl.h:1405) ==31520== by 0x4F14CCB: CoTaskMemAlloc (???:0) ==31520== by 0x606C8DA: ??? ==31520== by 0x4A21688: IMediaSample_SetMediaType (strmif.h:2289) ==31520== by 0x4A21688: media_thread (???:0) ==31520== by 0x7BC913B3: ??? (signal_i386.c:2700) ==31520== by 0x7BC9143B: call_thread_func (signal_i386.c:2759) ==31520== by 0x7BC91391: ??? (signal_i386.c:2700) ==31520== by 0x7BC9B3EE: start_thread (thread.c:487) ==31520== by 0x4244249: start_thread (pthread_create.c:333) ==31520== by 0x433FD6D: clone (clone.S:114) ==31520== ==31520== 72 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 322 of 616 ==31520== at 0x7BC51061: notify_alloc (heap.c:254) ==31520== by 0x7BC5554F: RtlAllocateHeap (heap.c:1716) ==31520== by 0x4F1442B: IMalloc_fnAlloc (ifs.c:187) ==31520== by 0x4F14CCB: IMalloc_Alloc (objidl.h:1405) ==31520== by 0x4F14CCB: CoTaskMemAlloc (???:0) ==31520== by 0x606C8DA: ??? ==31520== by 0x5FF3D18: ??? ==31520== by 0x5FF3F76: ??? ==31520== by 0x60006CA: ??? ==31520== by 0x4A21771: IMemInputPin_Receive (strmif.h:3041) ==31520== by 0x4A21771: media_thread (???:0) ==31520== by 0x7BC913B3: ??? (signal_i386.c:2700) ==31520== by 0x7BC9143B: call_thread_func (signal_i386.c:2759) ==31520== by 0x7BC91391: ??? (signal_i386.c:2700) ==31520== by 0x7BC9B3EE: start_thread (thread.c:487) ==31520== by 0x4244249: start_thread (pthread_create.c:333) ==31520== by 0x433FD6D: clone (clone.S:114) ==31520== ==31520== 72 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 324 of 616 ==31520== at 0x7BC51061: notify_alloc (heap.c:254) ==31520== by 0x7BC5554F: RtlAllocateHeap (heap.c:1716) ==31520== by 0x4F1442B: IMalloc_fnAlloc (ifs.c:187) ==31520== by 0x4F14CCB: IMalloc_Alloc (objidl.h:1405) ==31520== by 0x4F14CCB: CoTaskMemAlloc (???:0) ==31520== by 0x606C8DA: ??? ==31520== by 0x5FF3D18: ??? ==31520== by 0x5FF4014: ??? ==31520== by 0x60006CA: ??? ==31520== by 0x4A21771: IMemInputPin_Receive (strmif.h:3041) ==31520== by 0x4A21771: media_thread (???:0) ==31520== by 0x7BC913B3: ??? (signal_i386.c:2700) ==31520== by 0x7BC9143B: call_thread_func (signal_i386.c:2759) ==31520== by 0x7BC91391: ??? (signal_i386.c:2700) ==31520== by 0x7BC9B3EE: start_thread (thread.c:487) ==31520== by 0x4244249: start_thread (pthread_create.c:333) ==31520== by 0x433FD6D: clone (clone.S:114) ==31520== -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

2 3

[Bug 40811] New: WINESERVER variable is only used if @bindir@/ wineserver does not exist
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org Aug. 28, 2026

Aug. 28, 2026

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40811 Bug ID: 40811 Summary: WINESERVER variable is only used if @bindir@/wineserver does not exist Product: Wine Version: 1.9.12 Hardware: x86 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: wineserver Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: jre.winesim(a)gmail.com Distribution: --- Wine seems to *always* use @bindir@/wineserver as wineserver if it exists. The environment variable WINESERVER seems to be ignored as long as the former exists. $ alias pswineserver='ps aux|grep wineserver|grep -v grep|sed "s|.* ||"' $ sudo cp /opt/wine-devel/bin/wineserver /opt/wine-devel/test/ $ pswineserver $ WINESERVER="/opt/wine-devel/test/wineserver" /opt/wine-devel/bin/winecfg $ pswineserver /opt/wine-devel/bin/wineserver $ sudo rm /opt/wine-devel/bin/wineserver $ pswineserver $ WINESERVER="/opt/wine-devel/test/wineserver" /opt/wine-devel/bin/winecfg $ pswineserver /opt/wine-devel/test/wineserver Found in winehq-devel (1.9.12~stretch) from winehq, and wine (1.8.2-1) and wine-development (1.9.12-1) from Debian. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

2 5

[Bug 36309] New: valgrind shows a definite leak in ole32/tests/dragdrop.c
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org Aug. 28, 2026

Aug. 28, 2026

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36309 Bug ID: 36309 Summary: valgrind shows a definite leak in ole32/tests/dragdrop.c Product: Wine Version: 1.7.18 Hardware: x86 OS: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: download, source, testcase Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ole32 Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: austinenglish(a)gmail.com ==31321== 12 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 95 of 716 ==31321== at 0x7BC4C735: notify_alloc (heap.c:255) ==31321== by 0x7BC50F79: RtlAllocateHeap (heap.c:1716) ==31321== by 0x50D611D: WrapDropTarget (ole2.c:513) ==31321== by 0x50D640A: RegisterDragDrop (ole2.c:598) ==31321== by 0x497A471: test_DoDragDrop (dragdrop.c:496) ==31321== by 0x497AF08: func_dragdrop (dragdrop.c:572) ==31321== by 0x49D0714: run_test (test.h:584) ==31321== by 0x49D0B03: main (test.h:654) ==31321== -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

2 3

[Bug 52528] New: cuda 10.0 and 10.2 installation fails with "err:ole:CoRevokeClassObject COM was not initialized"
by WineHQ Bugzilla Aug. 28, 2026

Aug. 28, 2026

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52528 Bug ID: 52528 Summary: cuda 10.0 and 10.2 installation fails with "err:ole:CoRevokeClassObject COM was not initialized" Product: Wine Version: 7.0 Hardware: x86-64 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: -unknown Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: alois.schloegl(a)gmail.com Distribution: --- When trying to get warpem http://www.warpem.com/warp/?page_id=65 running, I'm trying to install cuda 10.0 or 10.2, according to these instructions https://gist.github.com/imaami/37105333c0d16210b2cac9d4032155aa on Wine-7.0 (stable), wine 7.1 (devel), and wine 7.1 (Staging). Staging provides some version of cuda, but the application crashes; a possibile reason is Cuda version mismatch. The installation procedure of Cuda 10.x proceedes quite far, but fails at the end always with .... .... 0138:fixme:cryptasn:CRYPT_GetBuiltinDecoder Unsupported decoder for lpszStructType 1.3.6.1.4.1.311.2.1.4 0138:fixme:cryptasn:CRYPT_GetBuiltinDecoder Unsupported decoder for lpszStructType 1.3.6.1.4.1.311.2.1.4 0140:fixme:ole:CoInitializeSecurity 00000000, -1, 00000000, 00000000, 0, 3, 00000000, 0, 00000000 stub 0138:fixme:kernelbase:AppPolicyGetProcessTerminationMethod FFFFFFFA, 0032FEAC 0138:err:ole:CoRevokeClassObject COM was not initialized Because I was not sure whether the important parts are installed, I tested with Cuda-Z, too. But Cuda-Z does not recognize the GPU's, in "stable" and "devel" (with "Staging" the gpu is recognized) The host system is Debian11, and two GTX 1080Ti cards, nvidia-driver/libcuda1 460.91. I tested Cuda 10.0 as well as Cuda10.2. In order reproduce this issue, You need to run these commands: URL_100=https://developer.nvidia.com/compute/cuda/10.0/Prod/local_installer… URL_102=http://developer.download.nvidia.com/compute/cuda/10.2/Prod/local_i… wget -nc $URL_100 wget -nc $URL_102 wineboot -i winetricks msxml3 winetricks win10 wineconsole cmd.exe /c "$(basename $URL_100)" -s \ {cu{dart,objdump,pti},nv{cc,prune,disasm,prof,ml_dev},memcheck, \ {cu{blas,fft,rand,solver,sparse},nvgraph,npp,nvrtc}{,_dev}}_10.0 wineconsole cmd.exe /c "$(basename $URL_102)" -s \ {cu{dart,objdump,pti},nv{cc,prune,disasm,prof,ml_dev},memcheck, \ {cu{blas,fft,rand,solver,sparse},nvgraph,npp,nvrtc}{,_dev}}_10.2 -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

2 7

[Bug 49941] New: Battle.net gui pop-up on launch ubuntu 18.04
by WineHQ Bugzilla Aug. 28, 2026

Aug. 28, 2026

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49941 Bug ID: 49941 Summary: Battle.net gui pop-up on launch ubuntu 18.04 Product: Wine Version: unspecified Hardware: x86-64 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: winedbg Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: dublg(a)hotmail.com Distribution: --- Created attachment 68323 --> https://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=68323 backtrace file Installed Battle.net-Setup.exe (bash) on installing World-of-Warcraft-Setup.exe a gui pops-up alongside the battle.net login window reporting an error has occured. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

2 5

[Bug 36609] New: valgrind shows uninitialized memory use in wscript/tests/run.c
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org Aug. 28, 2026

Aug. 28, 2026

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36609 Bug ID: 36609 Summary: valgrind shows uninitialized memory use in wscript/tests/run.c Product: Wine Version: 1.7.19 Hardware: x86 OS: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: download, source, testcase Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: wscript Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: austinenglish(a)gmail.com ==14496== Thread 2: ==14496== Syscall param write(buf) points to uninitialised byte(s) ==14496== at 0x4226D1B: ??? (syscall-template.S:81) ==14496== by 0x7BC46B60: NtWriteFile (file.c:1073) ==14496== by 0x7B83E03E: WriteFile (file.c:563) ==14496== by 0x62C0B3C: rpcrt4_conn_np_write (rpc_transport.c:444) ==14496== by 0x62B5AAB: rpcrt4_conn_write (rpc_binding.h:189) ==14496== by 0x62B7A2D: RPCRT4_SendWithAuth (rpc_message.c:849) ==14496== by 0x62B8B24: RPCRT4_Send (rpc_message.c:1245) ==14496== by 0x62BA3B1: I_RpcSend (rpc_message.c:1806) ==14496== by 0x62BA73B: I_RpcSendReceive (rpc_message.c:1909) ==14496== by 0x5F6DA45: rpc_sendreceive_thread (rpc.c:801) ==14496== by 0x7BC90A24: worker_thread_proc (threadpool.c:110) ==14496== by 0x7BC870C7: ??? (signal_i386.c:2571) ==14496== by 0x7BC87110: call_thread_func (signal_i386.c:2630) ==14496== by 0x7BC870A5: ??? (signal_i386.c:2571) ==14496== by 0x7BC8E4EC: start_thread (thread.c:428) ==14496== by 0x421FF92: start_thread (pthread_create.c:309) ==14496== by 0x43247ED: clone (clone.S:129) ==14496== Address 0x49a4c32 is 138 bytes inside a block of size 256 alloc'd ==14496== at 0x7BC4C6DF: notify_alloc (heap.c:255) ==14496== by 0x7BC50F23: RtlAllocateHeap (heap.c:1716) ==14496== by 0x62B786D: RPCRT4_SendWithAuth (rpc_message.c:808) ==14496== by 0x62B8B24: RPCRT4_Send (rpc_message.c:1245) ==14496== by 0x62BA3B1: I_RpcSend (rpc_message.c:1806) ==14496== by 0x62BA73B: I_RpcSendReceive (rpc_message.c:1909) ==14496== by 0x5F6DA45: rpc_sendreceive_thread (rpc.c:801) ==14496== by 0x7BC90A24: worker_thread_proc (threadpool.c:110) ==14496== by 0x7BC870C7: ??? (signal_i386.c:2571) ==14496== by 0x7BC87110: call_thread_func (signal_i386.c:2630) ==14496== by 0x7BC870A5: ??? (signal_i386.c:2571) ==14496== by 0x7BC8E4EC: start_thread (thread.c:428) ==14496== by 0x421FF92: start_thread (pthread_create.c:309) ==14496== by 0x43247ED: clone (clone.S:129) ==14496== Uninitialised value was created by a stack allocation ==14496== at 0x6A5D0C9: disp_call (dispex.c:1096) ==14496== -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

2 4

[Bug 46690] New: kernel32/tests/thread.c shows an invalid read
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org Aug. 28, 2026

Aug. 28, 2026

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46690 Bug ID: 46690 Summary: kernel32/tests/thread.c shows an invalid read Product: Wine Version: 4.2 Hardware: x86 OS: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: download, source, testcase, valgrind Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: kernel32 Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: austinenglish(a)gmail.com Distribution: --- ../../../tools/runtest -q -P wine -T ../../.. -M kernel32.dll -p kernel32_test.exe.so thread && touch thread.ok thread.c:346: Tests skipped: child process wasn't mapped at same address, so can't do CreateRemoteThread tests. ==24607== Thread 2: ==24607== Invalid read of size 1 ==24607== at 0x7B46DCFA: lstrlenA (string.c:194) ==24607== by 0x4B4B133: threadFunc1 (thread.c:235) ==24607== by 0x7BC785A3: ??? (in /home/austin/wine-valgrind/dlls/ntdll/ntdll.dll.so) ==24607== by 0x7BC7BA7E: call_thread_func (signal_i386.c:2701) ==24607== by 0x7BC78595: ??? (in /home/austin/wine-valgrind/dlls/ntdll/ntdll.dll.so) ==24607== Address 0xdeadbeef is on thread 1's stack ==24607== -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

2 2

[Bug 36138] New: valgrind shows some leaks in oleaut32/tests/typelib.c
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org Aug. 28, 2026

Aug. 28, 2026

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36138 Bug ID: 36138 Summary: valgrind shows some leaks in oleaut32/tests/typelib.c Product: Wine Version: 1.7.17 Hardware: x86 OS: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: download, source, testcase Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: oleaut32 Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: austinenglish(a)gmail.com Created attachment 48298 --> https://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=48298 valgrind log ==32128== 16 bytes in 1 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 122 of 609 ==32128== at 0x7BC4C735: notify_alloc (heap.c:255) ==32128== by 0x7BC50F79: RtlAllocateHeap (heap.c:1716) ==32128== by 0x4F980FA: alloc_bstr (oleaut.c:162) ==32128== by 0x4F98490: SysAllocStringLen (oleaut.c:324) ==32128== by 0x4F981A7: SysAllocString (oleaut.c:232) ==32128== by 0x4FBBBA5: TLB_append_str (typelib.c:1979) ==32128== by 0x4FCEAC1: ICreateTypeLib2_fnCreateTypeInfo (typelib.c:8728) ==32128== by 0x4C5A83F: test_SetFuncAndParamNames (oaidl.h:5892) ==32128== by 0x4C60908: func_typelib (typelib.c:5439) ==32128== by 0x4D35F00: run_test (test.h:584) ==32128== by 0x4D362EF: main (test.h:654) I'll attach a full log. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

2 3

[Bug 54197] New: cuda-z and warpem fail in wine-staging 7.22 and later
by WineHQ Bugzilla Aug. 28, 2026

Aug. 28, 2026

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=54197 Bug ID: 54197 Summary: cuda-z and warpem fail in wine-staging 7.22 and later Product: Wine Version: 7.22 Hardware: x86-64 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: -unknown Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: alois.schloegl(a)gmail.com Distribution: --- Created attachment 73728 --> https://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=73728 screenshot of running cuda-z one wine-staging 7.22 cuda-z fails to run in wine-staging 7.22 and later. It reports the error "CUDA not found. Please update the nvidia-driver.". cuda-z runs fine under wine-staging 7.21 (and earlier) on the same machine with the same nvidia driver. The application "WarpEM" can be also not used anymore because it does not find any GPU. I suspect that disabling the nvcuda-support patches in wine-staging [1] is the reason for this breakage. I believe bug #54102 is related, but the bug report says that this occured already in v7.21. But this issue is not reproducible to me in 7.21 only in 7.22. [1] https://gitlab.winehq.org/wine/wine-staging/-/commit/6c3797b3e8dba19698328c… [2] https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=54102 -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

2 6

[Bug 36134] New: oleaut32/tests/vartype show several warnings with valgrind
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org Aug. 28, 2026

Aug. 28, 2026

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36134 Bug ID: 36134 Summary: oleaut32/tests/vartype show several warnings with valgrind Product: Wine Version: 1.7.16 Hardware: x86 URL: https://test.winehq.org/data/7e874aed75765f3c017673178 cfd64301b7ba3ed/linux_ae-fedora64-heap/oleaut32:vartyp e.html OS: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: download, source, testcase Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: oleaut32 Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: austinenglish(a)gmail.com Created attachment 48297 --> https://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=48297 valgrind log ==29762== Invalid read of size 4 ==29762== at 0x4FD81F1: SysFreeString (oleaut.c:259) ==29762== by 0x4D73D6E: test_bstr_cache (vartype.c:6313) ==29762== by 0x4D74BC5: func_vartype (vartype.c:6449) ==29762== by 0x4D75F00: run_test (test.h:584) ==29762== by 0x4D762EF: main (test.h:654) ==29762== Address 0x4748da0 is 16 bytes after a block of size 64 free'd ==29762== at 0x7BC4C782: notify_free (heap.c:263) ==29762== by 0x7BC510C7: RtlFreeHeap (heap.c:1762) ==29762== by 0x4FD83E1: SysFreeString (oleaut.c:293) ==29762== by 0x4D73D44: test_bstr_cache (vartype.c:6310) ==29762== by 0x4D74BC5: func_vartype (vartype.c:6449) ==29762== by 0x4D75F00: run_test (test.h:584) ==29762== by 0x4D762EF: main (test.h:654) The tests also fail: vartype.c:3732: Test failed: expected 0xbfffffff 0xffffff23 (3221225471,4294967075), got (3221225472,0); hres=0x00000000 vartype.c:3735: Test failed: expected DISP_E_OVERFLOW, got hres=0x00000000 vartype.c:3739: Test failed: expected DISP_E_OVERFLOW, got hres=0x00000000 vartype.c:3815: Test failed: expected 2147483647ul 4294951488ul (2147483647,4294951488), got (2147483647,4294951936); hres=0x00000000 vartype.c:3816: Test failed: expected 2147483647ul 4294961488ul (2147483647,4294961488), got (2147483647,4294961152); hres=0x00000000 vartype.c:3817: Test failed: expected DISP_E_OVERFLOW, got hres=0x00000000 vartype.c:3818: Test failed: expected DISP_E_OVERFLOW, got hres=0x00000000 vartype.c:3838: Test failed: expected 0xbfffffff 0xffffff23 (3221225471,4294967075), got (3221225472,0); hres=0x00000000 vartype.c:3844: Test failed: expected DISP_E_OVERFLOW, got hres=0x00000000 vartype.c:3845: Test failed: expected DISP_E_OVERFLOW, got hres=0x00000000 vartype.c:3886: Test failed: expected DISP_E_OVERFLOW, got hres=0x00000000 vartype.c:3889: Test failed: expected DISP_E_OVERFLOW, got hres=0x00000000 vartype.c:3902: Test failed: expected DISP_E_OVERFLOW, got hres=0x00000000 vartype.c:3915: Test failed: expected DISP_E_OVERFLOW, got hres=0x00000000 vartype.c:3916: Test failed: expected DISP_E_OVERFLOW, got hres=0x00000000 vartype.c:3927: Test failed: expected 2147483647ul 4294951488ul (2147483647,4294951488), got (2147483647,4294951936); hres=0x00000000 vartype.c:3928: Test failed: expected 2147483647ul 4294951488ul (2147483647,4294951488), got (2147483647,4294951936); hres=0x00000000 vartype.c:3938: Test failed: expected 2147483648ul 15808 (2147483648,15808), got (2147483648,15360); hres=0x00000000 vartype.c:3939: Test failed: expected 2147483647ul 4294951488ul (2147483647,4294951488), got (2147483647,4294951936); hres=0x00000000 vartype.c:3954: Test failed: expected 2147483647ul 4294951488ul (2147483647,4294951488), got (2147483647,4294951936); hres=0x00000000 vartype.c:3955: Test failed: expected DISP_E_OVERFLOW, got hres=0x00000000 vartype.c:3970: Test failed: expected 2147483647ul 4294951488ul (2147483647,4294951488), got (2147483647,4294951936); hres=0x00000000 vartype.c:3971: Test failed: expected DISP_E_OVERFLOW, got hres=0x00000000 full log attached. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

2 5

[Bug 22950] New: nokia music player installation failed
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org Aug. 28, 2026

Aug. 28, 2026

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22950 Summary: nokia music player installation failed Product: Wine Version: unspecified Platform: x86 OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: loader AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: versterj(a)gmail.com when running setupoviplayer.exe to install nokia music player the installation hangs after terms and condition page has been "ok". i want to start to download the music asap. thanks -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

2 15

[Bug 36906] New: valgrind shows a few unitialized variables in dlls/ieframe/tests/ie.c (nsDocument::Release)
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org Aug. 28, 2026

Aug. 28, 2026

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36906 Bug ID: 36906 Summary: valgrind shows a few unitialized variables in dlls/ieframe/tests/ie.c (nsDocument::Release) Product: Wine Version: 1.7.22 Hardware: x86 OS: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: download, source, testcase, valgrind Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ieframe Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: austinenglish(a)gmail.com ==23635== Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s) ==23635== at 0x1029809B: nsDocument::Release (nsdocument.cpp:1611) ==23635== Uninitialised value was created by a client request ==23635== at 0x7BC4C4D6: mark_block_uninitialized (heap.c:209) ==23635== by 0x7BC4C641: initialize_block (heap.c:240) ==23635== by 0x7BC50F4D: RtlAllocateHeap (heap.c:1717) ==23635== by 0x781176B: msvcrt_heap_alloc (heap.c:70) ==23635== by 0x7812330: MSVCRT_malloc (heap.c:408) ==23635== by 0x80C71095: moz_xmalloc (mozalloc.cpp:54) ==23635== by 0x109B96F7: NS_InitXPCOM2 (nsxpcominit.cpp:464) ==23635== by 0x75A21B3: init_xpcom (nsembed.c:698) ==23635== by 0x75A2626: load_gecko (nsembed.c:774) ==23635== by 0x75A7013: create_nscontainer (nsembed.c:2042) ==23635== by 0x7527477: HTMLDocument_Create (htmldoc.c:4756) ==23635== by 0x7591178: ClassFactory_CreateInstance (main.c:238) ==23635== by 0x4EDD0A2: CoCreateInstance (unknwn.h:226) ==23635== by 0x4E042B2: create_mime_object (binding.c:258) ==23635== by 0x4E04652: create_object (binding.c:308) ==23635== by 0x4E071E8: report_data (binding.c:1077) ==23635== by 0x4E07531: InternetProtocolSink_ReportData (binding.c:1126) ==23635== by 0x4E0C8F0: ProtocolSinkHandler_ReportData (urlmon.h:3113) ==23635== by 0x4E0D441: report_data_proc (urlmon.h:3113) ==23635== by 0x4E0910E: process_tasks (bindprot.c:57) ==23635== -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

2 3

[Bug 36146] New: valgrind shows several leaks in dlls/jscript/tests/caller.c
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org Aug. 28, 2026

Aug. 28, 2026

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36146 Bug ID: 36146 Summary: valgrind shows several leaks in dlls/jscript/tests/caller.c Product: Wine Version: 1.7.17 Hardware: x86 OS: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: download, source, testcase Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: jscript Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: austinenglish(a)gmail.com ==32653== 12 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 69 of 753 ==32653== at 0x7BC4C6B7: notify_alloc (heap.c:255) ==32653== by 0x7BC50EFB: RtlAllocateHeap (heap.c:1716) ==32653== by 0x697611F: ??? ==32653== by 0x69764DD: ??? ==32653== by 0x6976548: ??? ==32653== by 0x6977213: ??? ==32653== by 0x69793E6: ??? ==32653== by 0x6979560: ??? ==32653== by 0x69796F5: ??? ==32653== by 0x6979D90: ??? ==32653== by 0x6972401: ??? ==32653== by 0x4E4DA12: _call_change_type (dispex.h:686) ==32653== by 0x4E4DC08: test_change_type (caller.c:139) ==32653== by 0x4E4DFD6: test_change_types (caller.c:196) ==32653== by 0x4E4E3B6: test_caller (caller.c:238) ==32653== by 0x4E4EADA: Test_InvokeEx (caller.c:363) ==32653== by 0x695D3E5: ??? ==32653== by 0x69621D9: ??? ==32653== by 0x6966B58: ??? ==32653== by 0x6966F33: ??? ==32653== ==32708== 18 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 129 of 768 ==32708== at 0x7BC4C6B7: notify_alloc (heap.c:255) ==32708== by 0x7BC50EFB: RtlAllocateHeap (heap.c:1716) ==32708== by 0x6A2F11F: ??? ==32708== by 0x6A2F4DD: ??? ==32708== by 0x6A2F548: ??? ==32708== by 0x6A312DE: ??? ==32708== by 0x6A32C08: ??? ==32708== by 0x6A2B401: ??? ==32708== by 0x4E4E1D2: test_change_types (dispex.h:686) ==32708== by 0x4E4F1E2: run_scripts (caller.c:549) ==32708== by 0x4E4F3CB: func_caller (caller.c:585) ==32708== by 0x4E5ED5F: run_test (test.h:584) ==32708== by 0x4E5F14E: main (test.h:654) ==32708== ==2241== 28 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 233 of 768 ==2241== at 0x7BC4C6B7: notify_alloc (heap.c:255) ==2241== by 0x7BC50EFB: RtlAllocateHeap (heap.c:1716) ==2241== by 0x6A2F11F: ??? ==2241== by 0x6A2F4DD: ??? ==2241== by 0x6A2F548: ??? ==2241== by 0x6A2F1E3: ??? ==2241== by 0x6A2FE69: ??? ==2241== by 0x6A2BC3E: ??? ==2241== by 0x6A4ABD4: ??? ==2241== by 0x7BC52F48: ??? (loader.c:138) ==2241== by 0x7BC55586: MODULE_InitDLL (loader.c:1068) ==2241== by 0x7BC55904: process_attach (loader.c:1157) ==2241== by 0x7BC5856A: LdrLoadDll (loader.c:2129) ==2241== by 0x7B85A735: load_library (module.c:933) ==2241== by 0x7B85A8A3: LoadLibraryExW (module.c:990) ==2241== by 0x544D69A: COMPOBJ_DllList_Add (compobj.c:495) ==2241== by 0x544FB62: apartment_getclassobject (compobj.c:1335) ==2241== by 0x54532AC: get_inproc_class_object (compobj.c:2894) ==2241== by 0x545376B: CoGetClassObject (compobj.c:3032) ==2241== by 0x5453D2D: CoCreateInstance (compobj.c:3197) Also, possibly: ==2205== 64 bytes in 2 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 411 of 768 ==2205== at 0x7BC4C6B7: notify_alloc (heap.c:255) ==2205== by 0x7BC50EFB: RtlAllocateHeap (heap.c:1716) ==2205== by 0x4FE80B4: alloc_bstr (oleaut.c:162) ==2205== by 0x4FE844A: SysAllocStringLen (oleaut.c:324) ==2205== by 0x4FE8161: SysAllocString (oleaut.c:232) ==2205== by 0x6A15E31: ??? ==2205== by 0x6A1730E: ??? ==2205== by 0x6A174E2: ??? ==2205== by 0x6A17DBF: ??? ==2205== by 0x6A18017: ??? ==2205== by 0x6A18088: ??? ==2205== by 0x6A19957: ??? ==2205== by 0x6A17F2E: ??? ==2205== by 0x6A19D84: ??? ==2205== by 0x6A1A5F8: ??? ==2205== by 0x6A3A6D1: ??? ==2205== by 0x4E4EE13: _parse_script_a (activscp.h:1290) ==2205== by 0x4E4F186: run_scripts (caller.c:541) ==2205== by 0x4E4F3CB: func_caller (caller.c:585) ==2205== by 0x4E5ED5F: run_test (test.h:584) ==2205== -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

2 3

[Bug 33257] New: Adobe Digital Editions does not recognize KOBO eReader.
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org Aug. 28, 2026

Aug. 28, 2026

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33257 Bug #: 33257 Summary: Adobe Digital Editions does not recognize KOBO eReader. Product: Wine Version: 1.4.1 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: -unknown AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: peterharris20(a)sky.com Classification: Unclassified Adobe Digital Editions does not find the KOBO eReader when it is plugged in. Ubuntu 10.04 recognizes it and displays the folder and contents. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

3 13

[Bug 55206] New: COD MW Remastered (2016) crackling audio
by WineHQ Bugzilla Aug. 28, 2026

Aug. 28, 2026

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55206 Bug ID: 55206 Summary: COD MW Remastered (2016) crackling audio Product: Wine Version: 8.11 Hardware: x86-64 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: winepulse.drv Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: brandowlucas(a)gmail.com Distribution: --- Created attachment 74806 --> https://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=74806 this is the audio log file until i hit the crackling on game. when using pulseaudio the game sounds like this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SmHY7uH1yzo when using pipewire, i don't even get audio at all: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=71m5g4usSx0 i've tested this game in many distribution, different proton versions/wine versions and it seems a wine bug. i made this video test was on vanilla wine-8.11. I also attached the log files. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

2 8

[Bug 45147] New: Menu/Window Z order incorrect in trueSpace
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org Aug. 28, 2026

Aug. 28, 2026

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45147 Bug ID: 45147 Summary: Menu/Window Z order incorrect in trueSpace Product: Wine Version: 3.7 Hardware: x86 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: -unknown Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: jcarthew(a)gmail.com Distribution: --- Created attachment 61334 --> https://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=61334 Screenshot showing rendering draw issue. When running Caligari TrueSpace, regardless of using OpenGL or software only rendering, the Z order of the file menu is incorrect. I have attached a screenshot showing the issue. The image on the left is how the program should look, the image on the right shows the flaw. The file/help menu is being overdrawn by a blue bar whenever a tool Window, or the editing viewspace is clicked on. the draw order temporarily resets to the correct behavior when alt-tab is pressed. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

3 8

[Bug 43388] New: valgrind shows a few definite leaks in dlls/winmm/tests/ mci.c
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org Aug. 28, 2026

Aug. 28, 2026

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43388 Bug ID: 43388 Summary: valgrind shows a few definite leaks in dlls/winmm/tests/mci.c Product: Wine Version: 2.12 Hardware: x86 OS: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: download, source, testcase, valgrind Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: winmm&mci Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: austinenglish(a)gmail.com Distribution: Gentoo ==2739== 0 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 6 of 1,022 ==2739== at 0x7BC51061: notify_alloc (heap.c:254) ==2739== by 0x7BC5554F: RtlAllocateHeap (heap.c:1716) ==2739== by 0x523E42B: IMalloc_fnAlloc (ifs.c:187) ==2739== by 0x523ECCB: IMalloc_Alloc (objidl.h:1405) ==2739== by 0x523ECCB: CoTaskMemAlloc (???:0) ==2739== by 0x1A4983D5: ??? ==2739== by 0x1A49D191: ??? ==2739== by 0x1A49D275: ??? ==2739== by 0x1A49D767: ??? ==2739== by 0x1A49DC76: ??? ==2739== by 0x19B3BF99: ??? ==2739== by 0x7BC913B3: ??? (signal_i386.c:2700) ==2739== by 0x7BC9143B: call_thread_func (signal_i386.c:2759) ==2739== by 0x7BC91391: ??? (signal_i386.c:2700) ==2739== by 0x7BC9B3EE: start_thread (thread.c:487) ==2739== by 0x4244249: start_thread (pthread_create.c:333) ==2739== by 0x433FD6D: clone (clone.S:114) ==2739== ==2739== 0 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 7 of 1,022 ==2739== at 0x7BC51061: notify_alloc (heap.c:254) ==2739== by 0x7BC5554F: RtlAllocateHeap (heap.c:1716) ==2739== by 0x523E42B: IMalloc_fnAlloc (ifs.c:187) ==2739== by 0x523ECCB: IMalloc_Alloc (objidl.h:1405) ==2739== by 0x523ECCB: CoTaskMemAlloc (???:0) ==2739== by 0x1A4983D5: ??? ==2739== by 0x1A49D191: ??? ==2739== by 0x1A49D275: ??? ==2739== by 0x1A49D767: ??? ==2739== by 0x1A49DC8D: ??? ==2739== by 0x19B3BF99: ??? ==2739== by 0x7BC913B3: ??? (signal_i386.c:2700) ==2739== by 0x7BC9143B: call_thread_func (signal_i386.c:2759) ==2739== by 0x7BC91391: ??? (signal_i386.c:2700) ==2739== by 0x7BC9B3EE: start_thread (thread.c:487) ==2739== by 0x4244249: start_thread (pthread_create.c:333) ==2739== by 0x433FD6D: clone (clone.S:114) ==2739== ==2739== 0 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 12 of 1,022 ==2739== at 0x7BC51061: notify_alloc (heap.c:254) ==2739== by 0x7BC5554F: RtlAllocateHeap (heap.c:1716) ==2739== by 0x523E42B: IMalloc_fnAlloc (ifs.c:187) ==2739== by 0x523ECCB: IMalloc_Alloc (objidl.h:1405) ==2739== by 0x523ECCB: CoTaskMemAlloc (???:0) ==2739== by 0x1A4983D5: ??? ==2739== by 0x1A49D191: ??? ==2739== by 0x1A49D275: ??? ==2739== by 0x1A49D767: ??? ==2739== by 0x1A49DC76: ??? ==2739== by 0x19C52F99: ??? ==2739== by 0x7BC913B3: ??? (signal_i386.c:2700) ==2739== by 0x7BC9143B: call_thread_func (signal_i386.c:2759) ==2739== by 0x7BC91391: ??? (signal_i386.c:2700) ==2739== by 0x7BC9B3EE: start_thread (thread.c:487) ==2739== by 0x4244249: start_thread (pthread_create.c:333) ==2739== by 0x433FD6D: clone (clone.S:114) ==2739== ==2739== 0 bytes in 2 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 13 of 1,022 ==2739== at 0x7BC51061: notify_alloc (heap.c:254) ==2739== by 0x7BC5554F: RtlAllocateHeap (heap.c:1716) ==2739== by 0x523E42B: IMalloc_fnAlloc (ifs.c:187) ==2739== by 0x523ECCB: IMalloc_Alloc (objidl.h:1405) ==2739== by 0x523ECCB: CoTaskMemAlloc (???:0) ==2739== by 0x1A4983D5: ??? ==2739== by 0x1A49D191: ??? ==2739== by 0x1A49D275: ??? ==2739== by 0x1A49D767: ??? ==2739== by 0x1A49DC8D: ??? ==2739== by 0x19C52F99: ??? ==2739== by 0x7BC913B3: ??? (signal_i386.c:2700) ==2739== by 0x7BC9143B: call_thread_func (signal_i386.c:2759) ==2739== by 0x7BC91391: ??? (signal_i386.c:2700) ==2739== by 0x7BC9B3EE: start_thread (thread.c:487) ==2739== by 0x4244249: start_thread (pthread_create.c:333) ==2739== by 0x433FD6D: clone (clone.S:114) ==2739== -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

2 2

[Bug 43384] New: valgrind shows a definite leak in dlls/rpcrt4/tests/ ndr_marshal.c
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org Aug. 28, 2026

Aug. 28, 2026

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43384 Bug ID: 43384 Summary: valgrind shows a definite leak in dlls/rpcrt4/tests/ndr_marshal.c Product: Wine Version: 2.12 Hardware: x86 OS: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: download, source, testcase, valgrind Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: rpc Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: austinenglish(a)gmail.com Distribution: Gentoo ../../../tools/runtest -q -P wine -T ../../.. -M rpcrt4.dll -p rpcrt4_test.exe.so ndr_marshall && touch ndr_marshall.ok ==32206== 44 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 207 of 413 ==32206== at 0x7BC51061: notify_alloc (heap.c:254) ==32206== by 0x7BC5554F: RtlAllocateHeap (heap.c:1716) ==32206== by 0x56B879E: RPCRT4_io_thread (rpc_server.c:559) ==32206== by 0x7BC913B3: ??? (signal_i386.c:2700) ==32206== by 0x7BC9143B: call_thread_func (signal_i386.c:2759) ==32206== by 0x7BC91391: ??? (signal_i386.c:2700) ==32206== by 0x7BC9B3EE: start_thread (thread.c:487) ==32206== by 0x4244249: start_thread (pthread_create.c:333) ==32206== by 0x433FD6D: clone (clone.S:114) ==32206== -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

2 2

[Bug 36925] New: valgrind shows a couple unitialized variables in dlls/ieframe/tests/ie.c (bestBtreeIndex)
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org Aug. 28, 2026

Aug. 28, 2026

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36925 Bug ID: 36925 Summary: valgrind shows a couple unitialized variables in dlls/ieframe/tests/ie.c (bestBtreeIndex) Product: Wine Version: 1.7.22 Hardware: x86 OS: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: download, source, testcase, valgrind Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ieframe Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: austinenglish(a)gmail.com ==14107== Thread 23: ==14107== Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s) ==14107== at 0x81258BAA: bestBtreeIndex (sqlite3.c:107585) ==14107== by 0x812848BD: sqlite3WhereBegin (sqlite3.c:109693) ==14107== by 0x812905EE: sqlite3Select (sqlite3.c:100747) ==14107== Uninitialised value was created by a client request ==14107== at 0x7BC4BF0A: mark_block_uninitialized (heap.c:209) ==14107== by 0x7BC4C075: initialize_block (heap.c:240) ==14107== by 0x7BC50981: RtlAllocateHeap (heap.c:1717) ==14107== by 0x77D619E: msvcrt_heap_alloc (heap.c:70) ==14107== by 0x77D6D63: MSVCRT_malloc (heap.c:408) ==14107== by 0x812510B5: sqlite3MemMalloc (sqlite3.c:15744) ==14107== Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s) ==14107== at 0x8125A351: bestOrClauseIndex (sqlite3.c:106141) ==14107== by 0x8125948C: bestBtreeIndex (sqlite3.c:108056) ==14107== by 0x812848BD: sqlite3WhereBegin (sqlite3.c:109693) ==14107== by 0x812905EE: sqlite3Select (sqlite3.c:100747) ==14107== Uninitialised value was created by a client request ==14107== at 0x7BC4BF0A: mark_block_uninitialized (heap.c:209) ==14107== by 0x7BC4C075: initialize_block (heap.c:240) ==14107== by 0x7BC50981: RtlAllocateHeap (heap.c:1717) ==14107== by 0x77D619E: msvcrt_heap_alloc (heap.c:70) ==14107== by 0x77D6D63: MSVCRT_malloc (heap.c:408) ==14107== by 0x812510B5: sqlite3MemMalloc (sqlite3.c:15744) ==14107== -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

2 4

[Bug 36587] New: valgrind shows uninitialized memory use in user32/tests/winstation.c
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org Aug. 28, 2026

Aug. 28, 2026

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36587 Bug ID: 36587 Summary: valgrind shows uninitialized memory use in user32/tests/winstation.c Product: Wine Version: 1.7.19 Hardware: x86 OS: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: download, source, testcase Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: user32 Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: austinenglish(a)gmail.com ../../../tools/runtest -q -P wine -T ../../.. -M user32.dll -p user32_test.exe.so winstation && touch winstation.ok preloader: Warning: failed to reserve range 00110000-68000000 preloader: Warning: failed to reserve range 7f000000-82000000 ==25156== Syscall param write(buf) points to uninitialised byte(s) ==25156== at 0x4226CF3: __write_nocancel (syscall-template.S:81) ==25156== by 0x7BC7FD72: send_request (server.c:198) ==25156== by 0x7BC7FF91: wine_server_call (server.c:294) ==25156== by 0x519D2EE: send_hardware_message (message.c:3331) ==25156== by 0x5173BEB: SendInput (input.c:185) ==25156== by 0x4D9FB49: test_inputdesktop (winstation.c:530) ==25156== by 0x4DA2430: func_winstation (winstation.c:939) ==25156== by 0x4DA3978: run_test (test.h:584) ==25156== by 0x4DA3D67: main (test.h:654) ==25156== Address 0x510f6a8 is on thread 1's stack ==25156== Uninitialised value was created by a stack allocation ==25156== at 0x4D9F748: test_inputdesktop (winstation.c:492) ==25156== -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

2 4

[Bug 36412] New: valgrind shows a possible leak in netprofm/tests/list.c
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org Aug. 28, 2026

Aug. 28, 2026

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36412 Bug ID: 36412 Summary: valgrind shows a possible leak in netprofm/tests/list.c Product: Wine Version: 1.7.18 Hardware: x86 OS: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: download, source, testcase Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: -unknown Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: austinenglish(a)gmail.com ==3773== 28 bytes in 1 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 159 of 560 ==3773== at 0x7BC50A9B: RtlAllocateHeap (heap.c:255) ==3773== by 0x4CD6BB8: apartment_getclassobject (compobj.c:526) ==3773== by 0x4CD9FC6: get_inproc_class_object (compobj.c:2894) ==3773== by 0x4CDCD2F: CoGetClassObject (compobj.c:3032) ==3773== by 0x4CDD4B7: CoCreateInstance (compobj.c:3197) ==3773== by 0x4B74D31: func_list (list.c:35) ==3773== by 0x4B75E84: run_test (test.h:584) ==3773== by 0x4B76272: main (test.h:654) ==3773== -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

2 4

[Bug 36191] New: valgrind shows some potential leaks in crypt32/tests/cert.c
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org Aug. 28, 2026

Aug. 28, 2026

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36191 Bug ID: 36191 Summary: valgrind shows some potential leaks in crypt32/tests/cert.c Product: Wine Version: 1.3.13 Hardware: x86 OS: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: download, source, testcase Severity: minor Priority: P2 Component: comdlg32 Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: austinenglish(a)gmail.com Depends on: 36190 ==17318== 20 bytes in 1 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 51 of 334 ==17318== at 0x7BC4C6B7: notify_alloc (heap.c:255) ==17318== by 0x7BC50EFB: RtlAllocateHeap (heap.c:1716) ==17318== by 0x4EE398B: CryptMemAlloc (main.c:124) ==17318== by 0x4EF7661: ContextPropertyList_SetProperty (proplist.c:132) ==17318== by 0x4EAC507: CertContext_SetProperty (cert.c:703) ==17318== by 0x4EAB7AF: CertContext_GetHashProp (cert.c:399) ==17318== by 0x4EAB9DB: CertContext_GetProperty (cert.c:445) ==17318== by 0x4EABFDA: CertGetCertificateContextProperty (cert.c:579) ==17318== by 0x4EADEF3: compare_cert_by_sha1_hash (cert.c:1368) ==17318== by 0x4EAE423: cert_compare_certs_in_store (cert.c:1530) ==17318== by 0x4EAEF02: CertFindCertificateInStore (cert.c:1794) ==17318== by 0x4EAAD3C: add_cert_to_store (cert.c:192) ==17318== by 0x4EAB27F: CertAddCertificateContextToStore (cert.c:287) ==17318== by 0x4EAA852: CertAddEncodedCertificateToStore (cert.c:65) ==17318== by 0x4CC9495: testAddCert (cert.c:198) ==17318== by 0x4CD8F2F: func_cert (cert.c:3976) ==17318== by 0x4D33F67: run_test (test.h:584) ==17318== by 0x4D34356: main (test.h:654) ==17318== ==17318== 20 bytes in 1 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 52 of 334 ==17318== at 0x7BC4C6B7: notify_alloc (heap.c:255) ==17318== by 0x7BC50EFB: RtlAllocateHeap (heap.c:1716) ==17318== by 0x4EE398B: CryptMemAlloc (main.c:124) ==17318== by 0x4EF7661: ContextPropertyList_SetProperty (proplist.c:132) ==17318== by 0x4EF788F: ContextPropertyList_Copy (proplist.c:215) ==17318== by 0x4EBE9AF: Context_CopyProperties (context.c:130) ==17318== by 0x4EAAB6C: Cert_clone (cert.c:139) ==17318== by 0x4F03664: MemStore_addContext (store.c:151) ==17318== by 0x4F03A35: MemStore_addCert (store.c:243) ==17318== by 0x4EAB119: add_cert_to_store (cert.c:263) ==17318== by 0x4EAB27F: CertAddCertificateContextToStore (cert.c:287) ==17318== by 0x4EAA852: CertAddEncodedCertificateToStore (cert.c:65) ==17318== by 0x4CC9495: testAddCert (cert.c:198) ==17318== by 0x4CD8F2F: func_cert (cert.c:3976) ==17318== by 0x4D33F67: run_test (test.h:584) ==17318== by 0x4D34356: main (test.h:654) ==17318== -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

2 10

[Bug 26049] New: ws2_32/sock tests shows some leaks in AcceptEx?
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org Aug. 28, 2026

Aug. 28, 2026

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26049 Summary: ws2_32/sock tests shows some leaks in AcceptEx? Product: Wine Version: 1.3.13 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: download, source, testcase Severity: minor Priority: P2 Component: winsock AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: austinenglish(a)gmail.com Created an attachment (id=33221) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=33221) valgrind log Several leaks like: 36 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost at notify_alloc (heap.c:254) by RtlAllocateHeap (heap.c:1701) by WS2_AcceptEx (socket.c:1991) by test_AcceptEx (sock.c:4464) by func_sock (sock.c:4703) by run_test (test.h:556) by main (test.h:624) -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

3 10

[Bug 40323] New: Sorry, we couldn't connect to Skype
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org Aug. 28, 2026

Aug. 28, 2026

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40323 Bug ID: 40323 Summary: Sorry, we couldn't connect to Skype Product: Wine Version: 1.9.5 Hardware: x86 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: -unknown Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: contrib(a)maxqia.com Distribution: --- Created attachment 53976 --> https://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=53976 Log Skype, with/without ie8 installed, always says "Sorry, we couldn't connect to Skype." when you launch it. If you don't have ie8 installed,it also opens a page to https://apps.skypeassets.com/static/skype.client.login/trunk/latest/release… -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

2 10

[Bug 36402] New: valgrind shows several leaks in dsound/tests/duplex.c
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org Aug. 28, 2026

Aug. 28, 2026

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36402 Bug ID: 36402 Summary: valgrind shows several leaks in dsound/tests/duplex.c Product: Wine Version: 1.7.18 Hardware: x86 OS: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: download, source, testcase Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: directx-dsound Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: austinenglish(a)gmail.com ==32429== 88,200 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 822 of 822 ==32429== at 0x7BC508EB: RtlAllocateHeap (heap.c:255) ==32429== by 0x652CEF2: IDirectSoundCaptureImpl_CreateCaptureBuffer (capture.c:797) ==32429== by 0x6536497: IDirectSoundFullDuplexImpl_Initialize (duplex.c:233) ==32429== by 0x4AAF23D: func_duplex (duplex.c:286) ==32429== by 0x4A9520B: main (test.h:584) ==32429== -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

2 3