- Wine-Bugs - list.winehq.org

[Bug 807] - PowerBuilder 6.0 generated applications crash accessing date fields
by wine-bugs＠winehq.com Sept. 12, 2002

Sept. 12, 2002

http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=807 ------- Additional Comments From apa3a(a)yahoo.com 2002-09-12 07:06 ------- Luigi, the Sybase support engineer (Bruce Armstrong) asks for the source of the test case. Could you attach the source to the bug report? He also recommends to try PowerBuilder 6.5 > The first thing I would recommend they do is migrate to a fairly late 6.5 build > and try it again. I had a 6.0 app that was blowing up with date edit masks on > one out of every 10 Windows machines. So now I need the same application, compiled under 6.5 to check whether we have Wine issue or this is old PowerBuilder problem. DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=807>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

1 0

[Bug 807] - PowerBuilder 6.0 generated applications crash accessing date fields
by wine-bugs＠winehq.com Sept. 11, 2002

Sept. 11, 2002

http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=807 ------- Additional Comments From apa3a(a)yahoo.com 2002-09-11 10:19 ------- Created an attachment (id=287) The debugging output of the application (with /PBDEBUG) on Wine DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=807>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

1 0

[Bug 807] - PowerBuilder 6.0 generated applications crash accessing date fields
by wine-bugs＠winehq.com Sept. 11, 2002

Sept. 11, 2002

http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=807 ------- Additional Comments From apa3a(a)yahoo.com 2002-09-11 10:18 ------- Created an attachment (id=286) The debugging output of the application (with /PBDEBUG) on Windows DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=807>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

1 0

[Bug 807] - PowerBuilder 6.0 generated applications crash accessing date fields
by wine-bugs＠winehq.com Sept. 11, 2002

Sept. 11, 2002

http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=807 ------- Additional Comments From apa3a(a)yahoo.com 2002-09-11 10:17 ------- I requested help on the PowerBuilder newsgroup: http://webforums.sybase.com/nntp/nd000011.nsf/($All)?OpenView DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=807>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

1 0

[Bug 347] - err:midi:OSS_MidiInit ioctl on midi info for device 0 failed.
by wine-bugs＠winehq.com Sept. 11, 2002

Sept. 11, 2002

http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=347 ------- Additional Comments From nt-(a)gmx.de 2002-09-11 04:19 ------- i think i know what causes that error. at least it disappeard when unchecking the EXPERIMENTAL emu10k1 midi support (sequenzer). DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=347>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

1 0

[Bug 347] - err:midi:OSS_MidiInit ioctl on midi info for device 0 failed.
by wine-bugs＠winehq.com Sept. 10, 2002

Sept. 10, 2002

http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=347 ------- Additional Comments From nt-(a)gmx.de 2002-09-10 12:24 ------- i can reproduce the: err:midi:OSS_MidiInit ioctl on midi info for device 0 failed. fixme:dsound:IDirectSoundImpl_SetCooperativeLevel( 0x403abad0,0000013c,3):stub. i think it has something to do with the emu10k1 midi-drivers in the kernel (2.4.19), i've tried wine with 2.4.18 without that err. i also found some older post of a guy in http://www.mail-archive.com/cooker(a)linux-mandrake.com/msg43652.html . but look for yourself. DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=347>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

1 0

[Bug 986] - OBDC.dll unimplemented
by wine-bugs＠winehq.com Sept. 10, 2002

Sept. 10, 2002

http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=986 ------- Additional Comments From mcbridematt(a)hotmail.com 2002-09-10 02:06 ------- A set of OBDC dlls for Windows 95 is included with MS Office Pro, look on the CD,you'll need Windows Installer to run it. run it by: msiexec /i $setupfile They don't seem to include however OBDC.dll itself. OBDC.dll from memory first appeared in Internet Explorer 4 and was probly last included in a IE installer in IE5.5 DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=986>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

1 0

[Bug 1019] - IpGetProfileString16 returns wrong release string.
by wine-bugs＠winehq.com Sept. 10, 2002

Sept. 10, 2002

http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1019 ------- Additional Comments From mcbridematt(a)hotmail.com 2002-09-10 02:02 ------- Sorry for that. I downloaded IE 5.5 setup and it had that problem in there to, and microsoft claims IE 5.5 does run on Windows 95 (which wine returns from IpGetProfileString16). I remember that the original IE5 installer did work, but failed to install IE itself. trace:setupapi:GenFormStrWithoutPlaceHolders16 "2.5" -> "2.5" trace:setupapi:SetupOpenInfFileW L"E:\\IXP001.TMP\\IESetup.inf" -> 0x403ca7c8 trace:setupapi:SetupFindNextMatchLineW (0x403ca7c8,L"Version",L"signature"): returning 0 trace:setupapi:IpGetProfileString16 0x403ca7c8: section "version" entry "signature" ret "$Chicago$" trace:setupapi:GenFormStrWithoutPlaceHolders16 "2.5" -> "2.5" trace:setupapi:SetupOpenInfFileW L"E:\\IXP001.TMP\\IESetup.inf" -> 0x403c97c0 trace:setupapi:SetupFindNextMatchLineW (0x403c97c0,L"Version",L"signature"): returning 0 trace:setupapi:IpGetProfileString16 0x403c97c0: section "version" entry "signature" ret "$Chicago$" trace:setupapi:GenFormStrWithoutPlaceHolders16 "CustInstDestSection" -> "CustInstDestSection" trace:setupapi:SetupOpenInfFileW L"E:\\IXP001.TMP\\IESetup.inf" -> 0x403cc7d0 trace:setupapi:SetupFindNextMatchLineW (0x403cc7d0,L"Version",L"signature"): returning 0 trace:setupapi:IpGetProfileString16 0x403cc7d0: section "version" entry "signature" ret "$Chicago$" trace:setupapi:GenFormStrWithoutPlaceHolders16 "HKLM,\"Software\\Microsoft\\Windows\\CurrentVersion\",\"ProgramFilesDir\",,\"%24%\\%LProgramF%\"" -> "HKLM,\"Software\\Microsoft\\Windows\\CurrentVersion\",\"ProgramFilesDir\",,\"C:\\\\Program Files\"" Notice IpGetProfileString16 returns $Chicago$, which is the codename for Windows 95 and which Windows 95 uses to identify itself. (also appears in INF files) Searching for some answers, I looked to the wine debugger: $ winedbg ie6setup.exe --debugmsg +relay then backtraced: Wine-dbg>bt Backtrace: =>0 0x400e2853 (start_process+0x2a3 [process.c] in libntdll.dll.so) (ebp=405c6f2 8) 1 0x400e7bbe (call_on_thread_stack+0x8e [sysdeps.c] in libntdll.dll.so) (ebp=4 05c6ff4) 2 0x400e7d5c (SYSDEPS_CallOnStack+0x14 in libntdll.dll.so) (ebp=00000000) then disassembled it: Wine-dbg>disassemble 0x400e2853 (start_process+0x2a3 [process.c] in libntdll.dll.so): xorl %eax,%ea x 0x400e2855 (start_process+0x2a5 [process.c] in libntdll.dll.so): movl %eax,%fs :0x60 0x400e285b (start_process+0x2ab [process.c] in libntdll.dll.so): movl $0x0,0x0 (%esp) 0x400e2862 (start_process+0x2b2 [process.c] in libntdll.dll.so): call *0xfffff f6c(%ebp) 0x400e2868 (start_process+0x2b8 [process.c] in libntdll.dll.so): subl $4,%esp 0x400e286b (start_process+0x2bb [process.c] in libntdll.dll.so): movl %eax,0x0 (%esp) 0x400e286e (start_process+0x2be [process.c] in libntdll.dll.so): call 0x40058b f8 (_init+0x13c0 in libntdll.dll.so) 0x400e2873 (start_process+0x2c3 [process.c] in libntdll.dll.so): xorl %esi,%es i 0x400e2875 (start_process+0x2c5 [process.c] in libntdll.dll.so): jmp 0x400e26 51 (start_process+0xa1 [process.c] in libntdll.dll.so) 0x400e287a (start_process+0x2ca [process.c] in libntdll.dll.so): leal 0x0(%esi ),%esi Ie6setup killed itself, then wine's own debugger made an exception, and opened gdb: (gdb) #0 0x402f1bf1 in ?? () (gdb) #1 0x404c7a42 in ?? () (gdb) #2 0x404e11b1 in ?? () (gdb) #3 0x400f2848 in ?? () (gdb) #4 0x400f1fbf in ?? () (gdb) #5 0x400f2382 in ?? () (gdb) #6 0x400ff372 in ?? () (gdb) #7 0x400ff8c1 in ?? () (gdb) #8 <signal handler called> (gdb) #9 0x404da1c2 in ?? () (gdb) #10 0x404e00f2 in ?? () (gdb) #11 0x404e1326 in ?? () (gdb) #12 0x404dece3 in ?? () (gdb) #13 0x404df117 in ?? () (gdb) #14 0x404c21a0 in ?? () (gdb) #15 0x400e2868 in ?? () (gdb) #16 0x400e7bbe in ?? () DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1019>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

1 0

[Bug 1019] - IpGetProfileString16 returns wrong release string.
by wine-bugs＠winehq.com Sept. 9, 2002

Sept. 9, 2002

http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1019 ------- Additional Comments From tony_lambregts(a)telusplanet.net 2002-09-09 19:47 ------- /usr/local/bin/wine: cannot find '/home/Matt/ie6setup.exe' ^^^^^^ ^^^^ No debuging information here since the program did not run. DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1019>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

1 0

[Bug 1018] - when running an installed app, wine states it cannot find the debugger.
by wine-bugs＠winehq.com Sept. 9, 2002

Sept. 9, 2002

http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1018 tony_lambregts(a)telusplanet.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution| |INVALID ------- Additional Comments From tony_lambregts(a)telusplanet.net 2002-09-09 19:40 ------- If your version of wine is indeed 20010112 you should get a newer version. Links are provided here.http://www.winehq.org/download/ Not having the debugger installed is usually the symptom of installing from rpm. and not from source. Most packagers do not configure the debugger with the assumption that if you are using the rpm you don't know what to do with debugger anyways. When you install from source using ./tools/wineinstall program the debugger is automaticly configured. If you know what to do with the debugger, the instructions for setting it up are here http://www.winehq.org/Docs/wine-devel/dbg-config.shtml (you need to run regedit to add the entry) This is not a valid bug. DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1018>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

1 0