- Wine-Bugs - list.winehq.org

[Bug 421] - Implement a DIB engine
by wine-bugs＠winehq.com Sept. 5, 2002

Sept. 5, 2002

http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=421 ------- Additional Comments From aljones(a)lbl.gov 2002-09-05 14:07 ------- from the description: >* the X bitmap has to be in the format of the X display. So if X is running in > 15bpp, a 32bpp DIB is converted to 15bpp, the operation is performed in 15bpp, > and the bitmap is then converted back to 32bpp. Obviously this implies that > each operation occurs a loss of color resolution (fortunately they should not > accumulate). for my version of X this no longer seems to be required: vendor string: The XFree86 Project, Inc vendor release number: 40199001 XFree86 version: 4.1.99.1 ... supported pixmap formats: depth 1, bits_per_pixel 1, scanline_pad 32 depth 4, bits_per_pixel 8, scanline_pad 32 depth 8, bits_per_pixel 8, scanline_pad 32 depth 15, bits_per_pixel 16, scanline_pad 32 depth 16, bits_per_pixel 16, scanline_pad 32 depth 24, bits_per_pixel 32, scanline_pad 32 depth 32, bits_per_pixel 32, scanline_pad 32 even though my screen is only in depth 15, i can manipulate pixmaps of any depth. i haven't yet figured out how to manipulate color information in these other pixmaps (save for just setting the pixel values directly -- works ok for TrueColor), but drawing seems to work fine... arthur DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=421>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

1 0

[Bug 1013] New: - Dropdown buttons in WordPerfect look bad
by wine-bugs＠winehq.com Sept. 5, 2002

Sept. 5, 2002

http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1013 Summary: Dropdown buttons in WordPerfect look bad Product: Wine Version: 20020804 Platform: PC URL: http://www.garrett.d2g.biz/images/winewp9Fontselectprobl em.png OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: minor Priority: P3 Component: wine-gui AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.com ReportedBy: gkajmowi(a)tbaytel.net

1 0

[Bug 1012] New: - Some fonts under WordPerfect 9 look bad
by wine-bugs＠winehq.com Sept. 5, 2002

Sept. 5, 2002

http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1012 Summary: Some fonts under WordPerfect 9 look bad Product: Wine Version: 20020804 Platform: PC URL: http://www.garrett.d2g.biz/images/winewp9settingsproblem .png OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: minor Priority: P3 Component: wine-gui AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.com ReportedBy: gkajmowi(a)tbaytel.net

1 0

[Bug 1010] - Unhandled exception in VFP6R.DLL (Visual FoxPro 6)
by wine-bugs＠winehq.com Sept. 5, 2002

Sept. 5, 2002

http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010 ------- Additional Comments From andi(a)rhlx01.fht-esslingen.de 2002-09-05 11:47 ------- Argl, I meant --debugmsg +relay DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

1 0

[Bug 1010] - Unhandled exception in VFP6R.DLL (Visual FoxPro 6)
by wine-bugs＠winehq.com Sept. 5, 2002

Sept. 5, 2002

http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010 ------- Additional Comments From andi(a)rhlx01.fht-esslingen.de 2002-09-05 11:46 ------- Did you realize what you just said ? You said it's a *workaround*, not a bug fix. Thus this bug is still valid :) (as I'm damn sure that VFP *should* run on a Win 9x based system) Sounds like there's a problem with some Wine Win9x support code that's being run when the app decides to switch to Win9x mode instead of NT mode. So should that bug be reopened ? (please submit a --debugmsg +Relay log file in win9x mode in this case) DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

1 0

[Bug 1010] - Unhandled exception in VFP6R.DLL (Visual FoxPro 6)
by wine-bugs＠winehq.com Sept. 5, 2002

Sept. 5, 2002

http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010 ------- Additional Comments From oscar.valdez(a)plastipak.com.sv 2002-09-05 11:35 ------- No, that's not exactly the way I would interpret things. At least on Wine, Visual FoxPro "runs" when Wine is imitating NT40, W2K or WXP, but not when it's imitating W9x. It seems like a simple workaround. And I say "runs", because I'm still getting OLE exception errors. DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

1 0

[Bug 1010] - Unhandled exception in VFP6R.DLL (Visual FoxPro 6)
by wine-bugs＠winehq.com Sept. 5, 2002

Sept. 5, 2002

http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010 ------- Additional Comments From andi(a)rhlx01.fht-esslingen.de 2002-09-05 11:24 ------- So you want to tell us that Visual FoxPro only runs on an NT-based Windows version (NT, Win 2000, XP) and never on a Win 9x system, right ? Or why else would you consider this bug to be closed ? DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

1 0

[Bug 1010] - Unhandled exception in VFP6R.DLL (Visual FoxPro 6)
by wine-bugs＠winehq.com Sept. 5, 2002

Sept. 5, 2002

http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010 oscar.valdez(a)plastipak.com.sv changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution| |WORKSFORME ------- Additional Comments From oscar.valdez(a)plastipak.com.sv 2002-09-05 11:11 ------- I've gotten over this problem by setting "nt40", "win2k" or "winxp" as the Windoze version to imitate. The Visual FoxPro application now runs, although with "OLE exception errors". That's a completely different matter though, so I consider this particular case closed. DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

1 0

[Bug 1008] - Internet Explorer 6 does not install
by wine-bugs＠winehq.com Sept. 5, 2002

Sept. 5, 2002

http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1008 mcbridematt(a)hotmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW everconfirmed|0 |1 ------- Additional Comments From mcbridematt(a)hotmail.com 2002-09-05 03:29 ------- *** This bug has been confirmed by popular vote. *** DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1008>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

1 0

[Bug 1007] - kernel32.dll.Heap32* functions unimplemented
by wine-bugs＠winehq.com Sept. 4, 2002

Sept. 4, 2002

http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1007 ------- Additional Comments From centaur(a)netmagic.net 2002-09-04 23:55 ------- Here's abbreviated --debugmsg +relay output, though I'm not really sure if I've gotten the part where it starts to barf. I've done some more reading, and it sounds to me like CreateToolhelp32Snapshot and friends are typically used for Windows debugging (is this correct?) so maybe the real culprit is further up the chain. Any help would be greatly appreciated! 08c58100:Call user32.GetCursorInfo(422a6590) ret=40c743a4 08c58100:Call x11drv.GetCursorPos(422a659c) ret=408279ad 08c58100:Ret x11drv.GetCursorPos() retval=00000134 ret=408279ad 08c58100:Ret user32.GetCursorInfo() retval=00000001 ret=40c743a4 08c58100:Call kernel32.GetCurrentThreadId() ret=40c73473 08c58100:Ret kernel32.GetCurrentThreadId() retval=08c58100 ret=40c73473 08c58100:Call user32.GetQueueStatus(000000bf) ret=40c743d0 08c58100:Ret user32.GetQueueStatus() retval=00000000 ret=40c743d0 08c58100:Call kernel32.GetCurrentThreadId() ret=40c73473 08c58100:Ret kernel32.GetCurrentThreadId() retval=08c58100 ret=40c73473 08c58100:Call kernel32.FreeLibrary(407e0000) ret=40c743f1 08c58100:Ret kernel32.FreeLibrary() retval=00000001 ret=40c743f1 08c58100:Call kernel32.GetProcAddress(40610000,40cbe7f0 "CreateToolhelp32Snapshot") ret=40c74401 08c58100:Ret kernel32.GetProcAddress() retval=40677000 ret=40c74401 08c58100:Call kernel32.GetProcAddress(40610000,40cbe7e4 "Heap32First") ret=40c7440b 08c58100:Ret kernel32.GetProcAddress() retval=4061771c ret=40c7440b 08c58100:Call kernel32.GetProcAddress(40610000,40cbe7d8 "Heap32Next") ret=40c74417 08c58100:Ret kernel32.GetProcAddress() retval=40617770 ret=40c74417 08c58100:Call kernel32.GetProcAddress(40610000,40cbe7c8 "Heap32ListFirst") ret=40c74423 08c58100:Ret kernel32.GetProcAddress() retval=40617738 ret=40c74423 08c58100:Call kernel32.GetProcAddress(40610000,40cbe7b8 "Heap32ListNext") ret=40c7442d 08c58100:Ret kernel32.GetProcAddress() retval=40617754 ret=40c7442d 08c58100:Call kernel32.GetProcAddress(40610000,40cbe7a8 "Process32First") ret=40c74439 08c58100:Ret kernel32.GetProcAddress() retval=40678d10 ret=40c74439 08c58100:Call kernel32.GetProcAddress(40610000,40cbe798 "Process32Next") ret=40c74445 08c58100:Ret kernel32.GetProcAddress() retval=40678d20 ret=40c74445 08c58100:Call kernel32.GetProcAddress(40610000,40cbe788 "Thread32First") ret=40c74451 08c58100:Ret kernel32.GetProcAddress() retval=406797c0 ret=40c74451 08c58100:Call kernel32.GetProcAddress(40610000,40cbe778 "Thread32Next") ret=40c7445d 08c58100:Ret kernel32.GetProcAddress() retval=406797d0 ret=40c7445d 08c58100:Call kernel32.GetProcAddress(40610000,40cbe768 "Module32First") ret=40c74469 08c58100:Ret kernel32.GetProcAddress() retval=40678ad0 ret=40c74469 08c58100:Call kernel32.GetProcAddress(40610000,40cbe758 "Module32Next") ret=40c74475 08c58100:Ret kernel32.GetProcAddress() retval=40678ae0 ret=40c74475 08c58100:Call kernel32.CreateToolhelp32Snapshot(0000000f,00000000) ret=40c744f7 08c58100:Ret kernel32.CreateToolhelp32Snapshot() retval=000000c4 ret=40c744f7 08c58100:Call kernel32.GetLastError() ret=00443683 08c58100:Ret kernel32.GetLastError() retval=00000002 ret=00443683 08c58100:Call kernel32.TlsGetValue(00000009) ret=00443691 08c58100:Ret kernel32.TlsGetValue() retval=41bd01e0 ret=00443691 08c58100:Call kernel32.SetLastError(00000002) ret=004436dd 08c58100:Ret kernel32.SetLastError() retval=00000002 ret=004436dd 08c58100:Call kernel32.UnhandledExceptionFilter(422a60a0) ret=00444eb6 08c58100:Call kernel32.IsBadCodePtr(7800b322) ret=00449078 08c58100:Ret kernel32.IsBadCodePtr() retval=00000000 ret=00449078 wine: Unhandled exception, starting debugger... DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1007>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

1 0