March 2015 - Wine-Devel - list.winehq.org

Doubt about translation related to hhctrl.rc
by Bruno Jesus March 7, 2015

March 7, 2015

Hi all, in order to check for the correct hotkey assignment I need to see the screen this is used. Can anyone help? >From pt_BR.po: 3153 #: hhctrl.rc:83 3154 #, fuzzy 3155 #| msgid "Properties" 3156 msgid "Proper&ties" 3157 msgstr "Propriedades" Best regards, Bruno

2 2

Re: ddraw/tests: Fix compilation on systems that don't support nameless unions.
by Marvin March 7, 2015

March 7, 2015

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=11972 Your paranoid android. === w8 (32 bit visual) === visual.c:1617: Test failed: unexpected colortable on offscreen surface === wvistau64 (32 bit ddraw7) === ddraw7.c:2524: Test failed: Expected message 0x46, but didn't receive it. ddraw7.c:2526: Test failed: Expected screen size 1024x768, got 0x0. ddraw7.c:2532: Test failed: Expected {0, 0, 1024, 768}, got {-8, -8, 1032, 746}. ddraw7.c:2563: Test failed: Expected {0, 0, 1024, 768}, got {-8, -8, 1032, 746}. ddraw7.c:2571: Test failed: Expected {0, 0, 1024, 768}, got {-8, -8, 1032, 746}. ddraw7.c:2598: Test failed: Expected {0, 0, 1024, 768}, got {-8, -8, 1032, 746}. ddraw7.c:2618: Test failed: Expected {0, 0, 1024, 768}, got {-8, -8, 1032, 746}. ddraw7.c:2635: Test failed: Expected {0, 0, 1024, 768}, got {-8, -8, 1032, 746}. ddraw7.c:2662: Test failed: Expected {0, 0, 1024, 768}, got {-8, -8, 1032, 746}. ddraw7.c:2679: Test failed: Expected {0, 0, 1024, 768}, got {-8, -8, 1032, 746}. ddraw7.c:2716: Test failed: Expected {0, 0, 1024, 768}, got {-8, -8, 1032, 746}. ddraw7.c:2727: Test failed: Expected {0, 0, 1024, 768}, got {-8, -8, 1032, 746}. ddraw7.c:2754: Test failed: Expected {0, 0, 1024, 768}, got {-8, -8, 1032, 746}. ddraw7.c:2774: Test failed: Expected {0, 0, 1024, 768}, got {-8, -8, 1032, 746}. ddraw7.c:2791: Test failed: Expected {0, 0, 1024, 768}, got {-8, -8, 1032, 746}. ddraw7.c:2818: Test failed: Expected {0, 0, 1024, 768}, got {-8, -8, 1032, 746}. ddraw7.c:2835: Test failed: Expected {0, 0, 1024, 768}, got {-8, -8, 1032, 746}. ddraw7.c:2873: Test failed: Expected {0, 0, 1024, 768}, got {-8, -8, 1032, 746}.

1 0

Re: [PATCH 5/5] wined3d: Support WINED3DFMT_R5G5_SNORM_L6_UNORM with EXT_texture_snorm.
by Stefan Dösinger March 7, 2015

March 7, 2015

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Am 2015-03-07 um 10:03 schrieb Stefan Dösinger: > From: Stefan Dösinger <stefandoesinger(a)gmx.at> I wrote this on a different computer, it turns out I had a different E-mail address set there... -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJU+r94AAoJEN0/YqbEcdMwzn0P/iFvgnhB2cZZnxR8OvV+thA1 a8Mg0k+hCw2rMKjsxvMKNf7Q6axfLaS/aR7xeHYkyVMr0d6P1JIWJwTJmzIQxd9x hxwUytx7bu4u5eFp1aCXDhfkEyrP+p09+XMtEIgAOKriudO+Fx6AU9VBrwNul74w raCiVhh3+UJy1kaZZYzTgAKB7rSuPRGJdKvk+Ai0c74BWv5YA9+Sc+NXAND+3Y0r dx8W035zfIu7eYQ1nmRadAhE40cndiRix9qYZig+s4lHFBHkHJoUPe0PX6qQSeOp tkY+4wGVdKD6CUFZQuTW3C8yW49bUibTcuThznpidZolrSsv4AjpYbnBSSecy4ts xloCM2zCJYgErtcUwDOsOK77W0k7/uNOBZWhLkWanaRLHcbgVVNXy99tMqwNSXyz uX8GMLwgWoeDM5eOj4a+9R0wBhp1HMOUsX+rpw1v4dFogdxgFPjMhAUWF93g1YfO cquKm2kYZqX5Xa3x2up37tejGzVTQASxqpxFxgL6No4oaIdhw9CscoPYkaEsbmD6 +P9iFV8eFBSCjH98zfDnoigNcmH7jV3EPeTqfPoSLylpcWcA0vIVRNj5w1Vz/04g bkAUHD2ya0nnLLD/09VhkATsR/4fEwpp+1hJimJmBxEIUCfS5qfT+SbsO1Euzgnn WjrUnhrsG5tNxxwkevlb =zJBD -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

1 0

Re: [1/4] ws2_32/tests: Fix a NT4 crash due to unsupported functions
by Marvin March 6, 2015

March 6, 2015

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=11962 Your paranoid android. === w2003std (32 bit sock) === sock: unhandled exception c0000005 at 00000000 === w2008s64 (32 bit sock) === sock: unhandled exception c0000005 at 00000000 === w2008s64 (64 bit sock) === sock: unhandled exception c0000005 at 0000000000000000

2 1

Re: [4/4] ws2_32/tests: Add more select() tests
by Marvin March 6, 2015

March 6, 2015

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=11965 Your paranoid android. === w2000pro (32 bit sock) === sock.c:3627: Test failed: expected 'A', got === wxppro (32 bit sock) === sock.c:3627: Test failed: expected 'A', got sock: unhandled exception c0000005 at 00000000 === w2003std (32 bit sock) === sock.c:3627: Test failed: expected 'A', got sock: unhandled exception c0000005 at 00000000 === wvistau64 (32 bit sock) === sock.c:3627: Test failed: expected 'A', got === w2008s64 (32 bit sock) === sock.c:3627: Test failed: expected 'A', got === w7u (32 bit sock) === sock.c:3627: Test failed: expected 'A', got === w8 (32 bit sock) === sock.c:3627: Test failed: expected 'A', got === wvistau64 (64 bit sock) === sock.c:3627: Test failed: expected 'A', got === w2008s64 (64 bit sock) === sock.c:3627: Test failed: expected 'A', got sock: unhandled exception c0000005 at 0000000000000000

1 0

Re: [3/4] ws2_32/tests: Improve setup_connector_socket to allow non-blocking connect calls
by Marvin March 6, 2015

March 6, 2015

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=11964 Your paranoid android. === w2008s64 (32 bit sock) === sock: unhandled exception c0000005 at 00000000 === w2008s64 (64 bit sock) === sock: unhandled exception c0000005 at 0000000000000000

1 0

Re: [2/4] ws2_32/test: Don't test unsupported IP_MULTICAST_TTL on NT4
by Marvin March 6, 2015

March 6, 2015

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=11963 Your paranoid android. === w2008s64 (32 bit sock) === sock: unhandled exception c0000005 at 00000000

1 0

Re: user32: Allow making window visible by WM_SETREDRAW message.
by Dmitry Timoshkov March 6, 2015

March 6, 2015

Jacek Caban <jacek(a)codeweavers.com> wrote: > --- > dlls/user32/win.c | 7 ++----- > dlls/user32/win.h | 1 - > dlls/user32/winpos.c | 3 --- > 3 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) This change needs quite a bit of tests. -- Dmitry.

2 1

Re: mmdevapi/tests: Remove an unused assignment (PVS-Studio)
by Marvin March 6, 2015

March 6, 2015

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=11941 Your paranoid android. === w7u (32 bit render) === render.c:1975: Test failed: Got wrong volume: 0.501088 render.c:2004: Test failed: Got wrong volume: 0.501088 === w8 (32 bit render) === render.c:1975: Test failed: Got wrong volume: 0.671337 render.c:2004: Test failed: Got wrong volume: 0.671337

2 1

Re: [3/4] dpnet: Always update type since it might change (try 5)
by Marvin March 5, 2015

March 5, 2015

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=11938 Your paranoid android. === w8 (32 bit address) === The test timed out

1 0