http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295
------- Additional Comments From ruffk(a)purdue.edu 2003-03-27 09:20 -------
Created an attachment (id=433)
The 100 lines before Winedbg starts
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295
------- Additional Comments From ruffk(a)purdue.edu 2003-03-27 09:19 -------
Created an attachment (id=432)
The part of the log that shows when Winedbg starts
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1343
------- Additional Comments From rbeckler(a)comcast.net 2003-03-27 08:34 -------
I'd like to downgrade my glibc but am a bit leary since a new kernel and source
was delivered several days afterwards. I'd have to turn back the clock a bit
too much. For now, I'll just have to use dos.
I have a feeling that when redhat 9.0 is released, you're going to see other
reports.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1343>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1346
mike(a)theoretic.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
everconfirmed|0 |1
------- Additional Comments From mike(a)theoretic.com 2003-03-27 05:27 -------
Hmm, can you attach a +winsock,+wnet trace please?
For some reason bugzilla doesn't wrap your first entry, so please either attach
it or upload it (bzip2 compressed).
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1346>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1342
------- Additional Comments From mike(a)theoretic.com 2003-03-27 05:25 -------
Agreed. I can't find a bug about the ImageList error, should I file one or turn
this bug into it?
BTW, I can't search on descriptions, so I might have missed one. I think both
Mike McCormack and Vitolay were tracking this, so hopefully it'll be fixed soon.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1342>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=105
mike(a)theoretic.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |INVALID
------- Additional Comments From mike(a)theoretic.com 2003-03-27 05:02 -------
If somebody can confirm this bug, it should be reopened. For now, it is useless.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=105>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1110
mike(a)theoretic.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |INVALID
------- Additional Comments From mike(a)theoretic.com 2003-03-27 05:00 -------
No response, closing.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1110>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1156
------- Additional Comments From mike(a)theoretic.com 2003-03-27 04:59 -------
These messages can be ignored. What actually goes wrong? If no response in a few
weeks, this bug should be closed.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1156>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295
------- Additional Comments From mike(a)theoretic.com 2003-03-27 04:53 -------
Can you get a backtrace from the crash?
Also if you could put up the last 100 lines before the debugger starts in a
relay trace, that would be good also:
wine --debugmsg +relay uoassist.exe 2>relay.log
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1253
------- Additional Comments From mike(a)theoretic.com 2003-03-27 04:42 -------
Can you give us the exact error? That function appears to be a partial stub,
some parts are in fact implemented.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1253>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.