http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2918
------- Additional Comments From saulius.krasuckas(a)elst.vtu.lt 2006-22-08 06:59 -------
* Jonathan Ernst wrote on 2005-10-06:
| Seems fixed. I can put all instruments in the panel and nothing is black.
Jonathan, do you remember what color depth your X server was running at?
I've tried the app on an X at 24 bits and it's measurement/generator instruments
get black when expanded.
I've branched to Thu, 6 Oct 2005 16:06:04 +0000 (commit
664e4106c6b9a765a4db7ac30ba9a3cf70aeb6ed), but to no effect: expanded
instruments are still black.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6028
Summary: Rome: Total War too many shaders error (appears to be
hardcoded to max of 64)
Product: Wine
Version: CVS
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Linux
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: wine-directx-d3d
AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org
ReportedBy: djones9960(a)gmail.com
Using wine 0.9.19 (and wine CVS from 19/08/2006), Rome: Total War installs fine
and you can get all the way to the menu screen. Unfortunately, when it comes to
the campaign map the thing crashes out with a 'd3d8: too many shaders' error.
Looking in the code, I found in $WINE_SOURCE/dlls/d3d8/d3d8_private.h the
following setting:
#define MAX_SHADERS 64
This is just to say that I changed that to:
#define MAX_SHADERS 256
...and I got to the campaign map. I don't know what knock-on effect this will
have (or indeed why there is a limit) so I'm submitting this as an FYI bug.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5835
Speeddymon(a)gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed| |1
------- Additional Comments From Speeddymon(a)gmail.com 2006-22-08 03:20 -------
I suspect that something around this line is the problem:
err:seh:raise_exception Unhandled exception code c0000005 flags 0 addr 0x4077f3
but that is my limited knowledge and is probably obvious anyways..
Tomasz, can you use the instructions provided for running a complete regression
test to find out exactly what patch between 0.9.15 and 0.9.16 it was that broke it.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6005
------- Additional Comments From mike(a)codeweavers.com 2006-21-08 23:31 -------
Created an attachment (id=3376)
--> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=3376&action=view)
Sample diff for test case
You can submit your test case to wine-patches as a diff. It needs wine_todo {}
around test cases that fail in Wine but pass in Windows... I created an
example diff for you and attached it here.
The test case is a good start, and will show somebody (perhaps you?) how to fix
the richedit code to work correctly.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6005
dank(a)kegel.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed| |1
------- Additional Comments From dank(a)kegel.com 2006-21-08 23:17 -------
Excellent. Think you can tackle the fix, too?
Tommy has a page with a few notes about richedit internals at
http://silenceisdefeat.org/~tkho/seas/wine, don't know if that will help.
(I am *so* glad he put together the test framework for richedit this year!)
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5835
jan.wine(a)zerebecki.de changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Component|wine-binary |wine-directx
------- Additional Comments From jan.wine(a)zerebecki.de 2006-21-08 22:58 -------
Can you retry with 0.9.19 (or later/cvs/git) and _attach_ the full output?
The pasted output in the original report does not contain any backtrace.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4976
------- Additional Comments From panov(a)canopus.iacp.dvo.ru 2006-21-08 21:55 -------
The bug still (wine-docs-0.9.19) exists.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5902
jan.wine(a)zerebecki.de changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Component|wine-binary |wine-misc
Keywords| |download, NoAppDBEntry,
| |source
------- Additional Comments From jan.wine(a)zerebecki.de 2006-21-08 21:17 -------
Is that the only output on the console?
Does that even happen when you stop the app from making any connections (stock
emule has a known problem there)?
Can you give a direct link to the exact version of that app you get this problem
with?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.