http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7709
------- Additional Comments From alex(a)thehandofagony.com 2007-16-03 14:02 -------
I experienced a crash even witn WINEDEBUG=-all, but it does seem to
bring "good luck". :)
I also managed to test the game on a non-HyperThreading Pentium 4 PC, which
means that this is not an SMP issue.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=765
------- Additional Comments From giles(a)gilesfreeserv.com 2007-16-03 13:56 -------
It would appear that the bug is fixed, and the patch was likely denied because
it is not in git format.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7690
juan_lang(a)yahoo.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Attachment #5355 is|0 |1
obsolete| |
------- Additional Comments From juan_lang(a)yahoo.com 2007-14-03 14:06 -------
It must be failing because the SD isn't self-relative. The stub for
RegGetKeySecurity needs to set that flag, I guess. I've tried to hack it, but I
can't seem to get the type of PSECURITY_DESCRIPTOR to be anything but PVOID due
to the definition in winnt.h - any idea?
------- Additional Comments From juan_lang(a)yahoo.com 2007-14-03 14:12 -------
A further thought on RegGetKeySecurity - perhaps it should be calling
NtQuerySecurityObject instead.
------- Additional Comments From juan_lang(a)yahoo.com 2007-14-03 17:03 -------
Created an attachment (id=5355)
--> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=5355&action=view)
Proposed patch
Does this patch fix it for you?
------- Additional Comments From juan_lang(a)yahoo.com 2007-16-03 13:50 -------
Created an attachment (id=5389)
--> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=5389&action=view)
Resynced patch
Resynced with origin. Does this fix it for you?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7663
rmh(a)aybabtu.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |rmh(a)aybabtu.com
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7551
juan_lang(a)yahoo.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
BugsThisDependsOn| |7768
------- Additional Comments From juan_lang(a)yahoo.com 2007-16-03 13:17 -------
Just noticed that GetProcessAffinity already does use NtQueryInformationProcess
- oops. This depends on that working properly then, which I've filed separately
as bug 7768.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7768
Summary: server doesn't support processor affinity masks other
than 1
Product: Wine
Version: CVS
Platform: Other
OS/Version: other
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: wine-kernel
AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org
ReportedBy: juan_lang(a)yahoo.com
This is perhaps two bugs rather than one, but they're so closely related I'm
entering them as one.
The server (in process.c) always initializes the process affinity (in the
get_process_info handler) to 1. On Linux, it's possible to get a process's
affinity using sched_getaffinity - the server should initialize a process's
affinity using this instead.
The server also prohibits setting a process's affinity to anything but 1 (in the
set_process_info handler), failing with STATUS_INVALID_PARAMETER. This seems
somewhat arbitrary. First, it could fake accepting the affinity, as long as the
affinity mask doesn't contain CPUs which aren't present (see bug 7766). Second,
it could set the process's affinity on Linux, using sched_setaffinity.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1434
Bug 1434 depends on bug 1986, which changed state.
Bug 1986 Summary: Star Trek Armada II : invisible mouse cursor
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1986
What |Old Value |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7762
------- Additional Comments From thestig(a)google.com 2007-16-03 13:01 -------
It works if I don't put the file name is double quotes. Try this:
FileCreateShortcut, c:\foo, bar.lnk
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7767
Summary: Reading Counts fails to install
Product: Wine
Version: CVS
Platform: Other
OS/Version: other
Status: NEW
Keywords: Installer
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: wine-misc
AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org
ReportedBy: dank(a)kegel.com
$ wine SRIWS.exe
Invocation of this Java Application has caused an InvocationTargetException.
This application will now exit. (LAX)
Stack Trace:
java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError
at java.lang.Class.forName0(Native Method)
at java.lang.Class.forName(Unknown Source)
at java.awt.Toolkit$2.run(Unknown Source)
at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
at java.awt.Toolkit.getDefaultToolkit(Unknown Source)
at sun.awt.GlobalCursorManager$CursorEvent.<init>(Unknown Source)
at sun.awt.GlobalCursorManager.<clinit>(Unknown Source)
at java.awt.Cursor.initIDs(Native Method)
at java.awt.Cursor.<clinit>(Unknown Source)
at java.awt.Window.<init>(Unknown Source)
at java.awt.Frame.<init>(Unknown Source)
at java.awt.Frame.<init>(Unknown Source)
at com.zerog.ia.installer.Main.c(Unknown Source)
at com.zerog.ia.installer.Main.main(Unknown Source)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Native Method)
at com.zerog.lax.LAX.launch(Unknown Source)
at com.zerog.lax.LAX.main(Unknown Source)
Sadly, WINEDEBUG=+relay causes the installer to abort early,
so I didn't learn anything with that.
Looking at +file, I see the last file opened before the crash was
C:\\windows\\temp\\i1174067555\\windows\\resource\\jre\\bin\\awt.dll
That JRE seems to be Sun's J2RE Version 1.3.1.
You can use a different JRE, but you have to tell the installer to do it.
I haven't tried this yet, but there is some doc on how to do it here:
http://www.zerog.com/iamanual/usermanual_ia45/user_guides/contents.htm
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7766
Summary: GetSystemInfo returns incorrect processor mask for MP
systems
Product: Wine
Version: CVS
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: wine-kernel
AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org
ReportedBy: juan_lang(a)yahoo.com
GetSystemInfo counts the number of processors in dwNumberOfProcessors, but
dwActiveProcessorMask remains 1 even if multiple processors are present.
Steps to reproduce:
1. Write a program which calls GetSystemInfo and prints the processors mask, e.g.:
SYSTEM_INFO si;
GetSystemInfo(&si);
printf("%lx\n", si.dwActiveProcessorMask);
2. Run this program on an SMP system.
Expected results:
On a 2-CPU system, the printout should be 00000003.
Actual results: 00000001
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.