http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7682
thestig(a)google.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
URL| |http://www.propellerhead.se
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed| |1
Keywords| |download
Summary|NtQueryDirectoryFile fails |NtQueryDirectoryFile fails
|if querying a symbolic link |when querying certain
|(eg: My Documents -> |symbolic link
|/home/username) |
------- Additional Comments From thestig(a)google.com 2007-12-03 01:37 -------
This bug occurs in the demo as well, but it depends on what the symlink is
pointing to:
If the symlink target is something under $HOME/.wine/drive_c, then
NtQueryDirectoryFile will resolve the symlink correctly.
If the target something outside of drive_c, i.e. $HOME, then it fails.
Using winecfg to add a mapping a drive letter to the target directory also lets
it resolve correctly, however, mapping a drive letter to any directory that
encompasses the target directory (i.e. Z: => /) does not resolve the symlink.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7555
------- Additional Comments From damjan.jov(a)gmail.com 2007-12-03 01:19 -------
Confirming with GIT just after wine 0.9.32.
Firstly, Java 1.6 is a mission to install, it doesn't install properly unless
you have MSVCR71.DLL around, and to reinstall it you have to delete ~/.wine. Is
there some reason we don't have a builtin MSVCR71.DLL in wine?
If you attach winedbg before clicking on File->Save As, you get the following
(from the beginning of the function where it crashes):
0x00411810: pushl $0xff
0x00411812: pushl $0x57e438
0x00411817: movl %fs:0x0,%eax
0x0041181d: pushl %eax
0x0041181e: movl %esp,%fs:0x00000000
0x00411825: subl $68,%esp
0x00411828: pushl %ebx
0x00411829: pushl %ebp
0x0041182a: pushl %esi
0x0041182b: pushl %edi
0x0041182c: movl %ecx,%esi
0x0041182e: call *0x5ac0e8 -> 0x7ee83956 GetVersion
[/usr/src/wine/dlls/kernel32/version.c:110] in kernel32
0x00411834: movl %esi,%ecx
0x00411836: movzbl %eax,%ebx
0x00411839: call 0x004114c0
0x0041183e: movl %eax,%edi
CRASH=> 0x00411840: movl 0x20(%edi),%ecx
0x00411843: leal 0x10(%esp),%eax
0x00411847: pushl %eax
0x00411848: pushl %ecx
0x00411849: call *0x5ae774 -> 0x7eb977d1 GetWindowRect
[/usr/src/wine/dlls/user32/winpos.c:168] in user32
So function 0x004114c0 returns 0, and the code expects something else.
Unfortunately function 0x004114c0 is long and complicated.
A +all trace is not very revealing either:
0009:Call user32.GetWindow(0001009e,00000002) ret=004115fb
0009: get_window_tree( handle=0x1009e )
0009: get_window_tree() = 0 { parent=0x30080, owner=(nil), next_sibling=(nil),
prev_sibling=0x1009c, first_sibling=0x100a6, last_sibling=0x1009e,
first_child=0x100aa, last_child=0x100bc }
0009:Ret user32.GetWindow() retval=00000000 ret=004115fb
0009:CALL MFC71.2372(00000000) ret=00411601
0009:Call kernel32.TlsGetValue(00000004) ret=7c15aeac
0009:Ret kernel32.TlsGetValue() retval=001749b8 ret=7c15aeac
0009:Call kernel32.TlsGetValue(00000004) ret=7c15aeac
0009:Ret kernel32.TlsGetValue() retval=001749b8 ret=7c15aeac
0009:RET MFC71.2372() retval=00000000 ret=00411601
0009:CALL MFC71.578() ret=00411615
0009:RET MFC71.578() retval=7c220074 ret=00411615
0009:trace:seh:raise_exception code=c0000005 flags=0 addr=0x411840
It could be GetWindow returns 0, which is passed into MFC71.2372, which returns
0, which causes the crash. But GetWindow is asked for the next sibling, which is
nil. Is it some obscure bug in wine's window management?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4381
thestig(a)google.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed| |1
------- Additional Comments From thestig(a)google.com 2007-12-03 00:47 -------
Looks like the patch never got accepted. Can you add a test case to:
dlls/user32/tests/edit.c
to show Wine behaves incorrectly and that this patch fixes the problem?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7669
thestig(a)google.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
URL| |http://www.ghisler.com/downl
| |oad.htm
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed| |1
Keywords| |download
------- Additional Comments From thestig(a)google.com 2007-12-03 00:45 -------
Could this be related to bug 7552?
With total commander, the nag screen only pops under the main screen if "allow
the window manager to control the windows" is turned on in winecfg and "emulate
a virtual desktop" is turned off.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7678
thestig(a)google.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC|the_unknown(a)gmx.net |
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed| |1
Platform|Other |PC
------- Additional Comments From thestig(a)google.com 2007-12-03 00:27 -------
looked familiar to bug 7680, but not caused by the same regression.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7680
thestig(a)google.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed| |1
------- Additional Comments From thestig(a)google.com 2007-12-03 00:20 -------
Regression caused by:
Author: Rob Shearman <rob(a)codeweavers.com>
Date: Tue Feb 6 19:20:43 2007 +0000
comctl32: Fix the computation of the select bounds item rect
and fixup the places that depended on the old behaviour.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7680
thestig(a)google.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
URL| |http://www.anytag.de/downloa
| |d/mp3tagv237asetup.exe
Status|RESOLVED |UNCONFIRMED
Component|wine-gui |wine-comctl32
Keywords| |download, regression
Resolution|DUPLICATE |
------- Additional Comments From thestig(a)google.com 2007-12-03 00:19 -------
the two bugs looked very similar, but when I did the regression testing it
turned out reverting the patch that caused the regression did not fix bug 7678.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7690
Summary: Hoai client fails to install
Product: Wine
Version: CVS
Platform: Other
URL: http://www.hoai.de
OS/Version: other
Status: NEW
Keywords: download, Installer
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: wine-misc
AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org
ReportedBy: dank(a)kegel.com
Say, maybe we should have an advapi section in bugzilla.
testversionshoai80.exe installs fine, but when
it launches the client installer at the end,
it fails. (You have to have the ie6 registry key set
to get this far, so do 'winetricks fakeie6' if you haven't already.)
After installation fails, you can restart just the client
installation with
$ cd "$WINEPREFIX/drive_c/Program Files/KOBOLD/shoai.80/admin/client-installation"
$ wine shoai80clientSetup.exe
shoai80clientSetup fails with a dialog box,
122: Insufficient buffer
Looking at +relay, I see
001c:Call advapi32.RegGetKeySecurity(00000044,00000004,00000000,0047347c)
ret=0044422d
trace:reg:RegGetKeySecurity (0x44,4,(nil),0)
001c:Ret advapi32.RegGetKeySecurity() retval=0000007a ret=0044422d
001c:Call advapi32.RegGetKeySecurity(00000044,00000004,00000000,0047347c)
ret=0044422d
trace:reg:RegGetKeySecurity (0x44,4,(nil),0)
001c:Ret advapi32.RegGetKeySecurity() retval=0000007a ret=0044422d
right before the failure. It looks like a bug in our
RegGetKeySecurity, which isn't setting *lpcbSecurityDescriptor
on exit. Fixing that gets to the very next call, which fails
with dialog box "87: Invalid parameter" and the following +relay output:
001c:Call
advapi32.MakeAbsoluteSD(0047b8b4,00000000,0034f9d4,00000000,0034f9d8,00000000,0034f9dc,00000000,0034f9e0,00000000,0034f9e4)
ret=00443e4d
001c:Ret advapi32.MakeAbsoluteSD() retval=00000000 ret=00443e4d
001c:Call
advapi32.MakeAbsoluteSD(0047b8b4,00000000,0034f9d4,00000000,0034f9d8,00000000,0034f9dc,00000000,0034f9e0,00000000,0034f9e4)
ret=00443e4d
001c:Ret advapi32.MakeAbsoluteSD() retval=00000000 ret=00443e4d
001c:Call kernel32.GetLastError() ret=004504d6
001c:Ret kernel32.GetLastError() retval=00000057 ret=004504d6
Bleah, too much for me for tonight, guess I'm a wimp :-)
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7678
thestig(a)google.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |the_unknown(a)gmx.net
------- Additional Comments From thestig(a)google.com 2007-11-03 23:30 -------
*** Bug 7680 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7680
thestig(a)google.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |DUPLICATE
------- Additional Comments From thestig(a)google.com 2007-11-03 23:30 -------
I think it's the same bug.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 7678 ***
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.