http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2467
Patryk Rzadzinski <rzadzins(a)wit.edu.pl> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |rzadzins(a)wit.edu.pl
--- Comment #82 from Patryk Rzadzinski <rzadzins(a)wit.edu.pl> 2008-05-20 01:34:22 ---
(In reply to comment #81)
> If the only your argument is that WineX suits your needs WineHQ bugzilla
> is not an appropriate place to advertize it. Still, it's fair to note that
> only small portions of WineX are available through CVS. WineX CVS mostly
> aims to imitate that the source is open while it is not.
>
Excuse me for butting in, but since he pointed that it works on winex and fails
in newest wine, isn't that enough for the developers to have a closer look into
this issue, check the differences in the code or at least have a closer look
and come up with an idea what the problem is all about?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2467
--- Comment #81 from Dmitry Timoshkov <dmitry(a)codeweavers.com> 2008-05-20 01:18:05 ---
If the only your argument is that WineX suits your needs WineHQ bugzilla
is not an appropriate place to advertize it. Still, it's fair to note that
only small portions of WineX are available through CVS. WineX CVS mostly
aims to imitate that the source is open while it is not.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2467
--- Comment #79 from Chadwick Ferguson <chadwick(a)clan-mac.com> 2008-05-20 01:07:45 ---
(In reply to comment #78)
> (In reply to comment #77)
> > right so transgaming winex has this bug 100% fixed and maybe the DIB engine
> > implemented because Starcraft is WAY smooth. Winex is still avail. through cvs
>
> This comment full of speculations is not appropriate for Wine bugzilla.
>
http://www.youtube.com/v/i0WYRD14H3E
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6254
Saulius K. <saulius2(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |saulius2(a)gmail.com
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2493
DrkShadow <winehq.10.drkshadow(a)spamgourmet.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Attachment #13191|0 |1
is patch| |
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2493
--- Comment #11 from DrkShadow <winehq.10.drkshadow(a)spamgourmet.com> 2008-05-19 22:43:47 ---
Created an attachment (id=13191)
--> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=13191)
shift+up selects the appropriate number of items
I'm not exactly sure what the loop started with the modified if is doing, but
I'm pretty sure that resetting the selection pointer if it's > the current
selected item is simply wrong. Therefore, this "find selected item or, failing
that, start of range" loop should be done only if there is no selected item.
Therefore, I propose removing the check mentioned formerly.
The benefit is it won't go through all the effort just to be ignored, as with
patch 6082, and... I'm not sure what 12668 does.. it doesn't appear it would
even work. (Actually, patch 12668 would probably allow you to select three
items, then repeat the behavior.)
I'd say: fixed.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8898
--- Comment #13 from David Anderson <davea42(a)earthlink.net> 2008-05-19 22:32:17 ---
Works great for me (I'm bug submitter). Thanks!
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7698
Paul Johnson <baloo(a)ursine.ca> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |baloo(a)ursine.ca
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2467
--- Comment #78 from Dmitry Timoshkov <dmitry(a)codeweavers.com> 2008-05-19 22:24:43 ---
(In reply to comment #77)
> right so transgaming winex has this bug 100% fixed and maybe the DIB engine
> implemented because Starcraft is WAY smooth. Winex is still avail. through cvs
This comment full of speculations is not appropriate for Wine bugzilla.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.