wine-bugs November 2010

wine-bugs@winehq.org

1 participants
8143 discussions

[Bug 15655] New: Tournament director doesn't start
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org 12 Feb '21

12 Feb '21

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15655 Summary: Tournament director doesn't start Product: Wine Version: 1.1.6 Platform: PC URL: http://www.thetournamentdirector.net/download.html OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: download Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: -unknown AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: austinenglish(a)gmail.com Depends on: 15654 Created an attachment (id=16714) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=16714) +relay in git After bug 15654, Tournament Director still won't run: Few generic errors, but seems this may be the culprit: err:ole:CoGetClassObject class {a6b222ab-a5ea-4899-b230-084657eddc7d} not registered err:ole:CoGetClassObject no class object {a6b222ab-a5ea-4899-b230-084657eddc7d} could be created for context 0x1 which is "Browser Thread State" +relay attached -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

2 15

[Bug 14697] New: wineserver: debug events can block completion of queued user APCs
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org 11 Feb '21

11 Feb '21

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14697 Summary: wineserver: debug events can block completion of queued user APCs Product: Wine Version: CVS/GIT Platform: PC OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: wineserver AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: focht(a)gmx.net Hello, consider the following scenario... A debugger is attached to a debuggee. The debuggee has two threads. The debugger processes debug events and queries virtual memory info of remote process using VirtualQueryEx in its main loop. VirtualQueryEx -> NtQueryVirtualMemory -> enqueues APC_VIRTUAL_QUERY user APC for remote process (debuggee). The calling thread is blocked until the APC is completed. Following is the "good" case: tid=0009 (debugger process, calling thread, main debugger loop) tid=001a (debuggee thread 1) --- snip --- .. 0009: queue_apc( thread=(nil), process=0x54, call={APC_VIRTUAL_QUERY,addr=0x7fff0000} ) 001a: *wakeup* signaled=192 cookie=0x7ffdb7b4 0009: queue_apc() = 0 { handle=0x68, self=0 } 0009: select( flags=4, cookie=0x32d30c, signal=(nil), prev_apc=(nil), timeout=infinite, result={}, handles={0x68} ) 0009: select() = PENDING { apc_handle=(nil), timeout=infinite, call={APC_NONE} } 001a: select( flags=4, cookie=0x7ffdb7b4, signal=(nil), prev_apc=(nil), timeout=1c8f097946d2824 (-0.1787600), result={}, handles={} ) 001a: select() = USER_APC { apc_handle=0x68, timeout=1c8f097946d2824 (-0.1787600), call={APC_VIRTUAL_QUERY,addr=0x7fff0000} } 001a: select( flags=4, cookie=0x7ffdb7b4, signal=(nil), prev_apc=0x68, timeout=1c8f097946d2824 (-0.1792110), result={APC_VIRTUAL_QUERY,status=40000002,base=(nil),alloc_base=(nil),size=0,state=0,prot=0,alloc_prot=0,alloc_type=0}, handles={} ) 0009: *wakeup* signaled=0 cookie=0x32d30c 001a: select() = PENDING { apc_handle=(nil), timeout=1c8f097946d2824 (-0.1792110), call={APC_NONE} } 0009: get_apc_result( handle=0x68 ) 0009: get_apc_result() = 0 { result={APC_VIRTUAL_QUERY,status=40000002,base=(nil),alloc_base=(nil),size=0,state=0,prot=0,alloc_prot=0,alloc_type=0} } --- snip --- Now the interesting one, which ultimately leads to block of calling thread ... tid=0009 (debugger process, calling thread, main debugger loop) tid=001a (debuggee thread 1) tid=001b (debuggee thread 2) --- snip --- 0009: continue_debug_event( pid=0019, tid=001a, status=65538 ) 001a: *wakeup* signaled=258 cookie=0x7ffdb7b4 001b: *wakeup* signaled=258 cookie=0x7ffd77b4 0009: continue_debug_event() = 0 .. 0009: read_process_memory( handle=0x54, addr=0x7ffd8000 ) 001a: *signal* signal=19 0009: read_process_memory() = 0 { data= {} } 0009: read_process_memory( handle=0x54, addr=0x7ffd4000 ) 001a: *signal* signal=19 0009: read_process_memory() = 0 { data={} } 0009: queue_apc( thread=(nil), process=0x54, call={APC_VIRTUAL_QUERY,addr=(nil)} ) 001b: *wakeup* signaled=192 cookie=0x7ed44874 0009: queue_apc() = 0 { handle=0x68, self=0 } 001a: load_dll( handle=(nil), base=0x61090000, size=102400, dbg_offset=0, dbg_size=0, name=0x13e468, filename=L"C:\\windows\\system32\\msacm32.dll" ) 001a: *sent signal* signal=10 001b: *sent signal* signal=10 001a: load_dll() = 0 .. 0009: select( flags=4, cookie=0x32d30c, signal=(nil), prev_apc=(nil), timeout=infinite, result={}, handles={0x68} ) 0009: select() = PENDING { apc_handle=(nil), timeout=infinite, call={APC_NONE} } 001a: set_thread_context( handle=0xfffffffe, flags=00010007, suspend=1, context= {...}) 001a: set_thread_context() = 0 { self=1 } 001b: select( flags=4, cookie=0x7ed44874, signal=(nil), prev_apc=(nil), timeout=infinite, result={}, handles={0x4c} ) 001b: select() = USER_APC { apc_handle=0x68, timeout=infinite, call={APC_VIRTUAL_QUERY,addr=(nil)} } 001a: select( flags=4, cookie=0x7ffdb7b4, signal=(nil), prev_apc=(nil), timeout=0, result={}, handles={} ) 001a: select() = PENDING { apc_handle=(nil), timeout=1c8f09794c8b694 (+0.0000000), call={APC_NONE} } 001b: set_thread_context( handle=0xfffffffe, flags=00010007, suspend=1, context= {...}) 001b: set_thread_context() = 0 { self=1 } 001b: select( flags=4, cookie=0x7ffd77b4, signal=(nil), prev_apc=(nil), timeout=0, result={}, handles={} ) 001b: select() = PENDING { apc_handle=(nil), timeout=1c8f09794c90dc4 (+0.0000000), call={APC_NONE} } ... --- snip --- At this point, tid=0009 (debugger) is blocked forever. When the APC_VIRTUAL_QUERY user APC is queued, remote thread 001b is selected/destined to carry out the APC. After thread 001a and 001b woke up, a dynamic library is loaded from thread 001a which results in LOAD_DLL_DEBUG_EVENT dispatched. This initiates the suspension of all threads in the child process (SIGUSR1 is sent for 001a and 001b). Thread 001a is suspended first, 001b next. The suspension of 001b happens to a time when 001b is about to carry out the APC_VIRTUAL_QUERY. Meanwhile thread 0009 (calling process) is waiting for APC completion result forever because it's blocked by VirtualQueryEx in debugger loop, unable to receive and process any debug event. Regards -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

2 21

[Bug 10249] New: Battlefield2/SafeDisc 4. x and Punkbuster services cause lockup: child processes debugging misconception
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org 11 Feb '21

11 Feb '21

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10249 Summary: Battlefield2/SafeDisc 4.x and Punkbuster services cause lockup: child processes debugging misconception Product: Wine Version: CVS/GIT Platform: PC OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: major Priority: P2 Component: wine-kernel AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: focht(a)gmx.net Created an attachment (id=8876) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=8876) WINEDEBUG=-all,+server,+tid,+loaddll,+seh wine ./BF2.exe +fullscreen 0 +szx 800 +szy 600 &>/tmp/debug_pipe Hello, while testing some PunkBuster stuff on popular games, I came across Battlefield 2 which employs SafeDisc 4.x It seems there is a problem with debuggers in chained child processes. Consider following scenario: --- snip process list --- pid threads parent executable (all id:s are in hex) 0000001b 1 00000008 'PnkBstrA.exe' 0000000c 2 00000008 'explorer.exe' 0000000a 2 00000008 '~e5.0001' 00000008 4 00000000 'BF2.exe' --- snip process list --- --- snip thread list --- process tid prio (all id:s are in hex) 0000001b 0000001c 0 0000000c 00000010 0 0000000d 0 0000000a 00000012 0 0000000b 0 00000008 0000001a 1 00000014 15 00000013 0 00000009 0 --- snip thread list --- "BF2.exe" = parent (game) "~e5.0001" = 1st child = SafeDisc 4.x process = "debugger" "PnkBstrA.exe" = 2nd child = PunkBuster Update Service The 1st child acts as debugger for the parent "BF2.exe" and receives all debug events (process, thread creation, dll load/unload...) There are lots of breakpoint events triggered from parent. This is part of SafeDisc 4.x and used for on-the-fly decryption of code sections (child decrypts code of father). When PunkBuster is initialized (loading of pbcl = client, pbag = agent), the following services should get started: PnkBstrA.exe, PnkBstrB.exe and finally the kmode driver PnkBstrK.exe The service process "PnkBstrA.exe" is started from main process "BF2.exe" (which is a debuggee itself). No debug flags (DEBUG_PROCESS | DEBUG_ONLY_THIS_PROCESS) are specified in process creation flags. The debugger (child of parent, receives the process creation event) does not make debugger_attach() to the newly created child process. The child process seems to inherit the state of being a "debuggee": wine server -> new_process -> set_process_debugger( process, parent->debugger ); The parent got its process->debugger from debugger_attach(). This leads to a problem in child process startup code: "dlls/kernel32/process.c:start_process()" checks the PEB->BeingDebugged field and if set, a system breakpoint is encountered before the entry code is called. This breakpoint results in debug event - seen by debugger. Unfortunately this event is _not_ expected by debugger because it didn't expect another debuggee (child) to be created. Ok, long story short solution: If you debug a process by attaching to an already created process, you _must_ treat default debugging flags as if the process has been created with DEBUG_ONLY_THIS_PROCESS, meaning that all childs created by debuggee will NOT automagically become debuggees. Short and (hopefully) acceptable patch snippet: --- snip --- diff --git a/server/debugger.c b/server/debugger.c index a64a17a..c59f3a0 100644 --- a/server/debugger.c +++ b/server/debugger.c @@ -444,6 +444,7 @@ static int debugger_attach( struct process *process, struct thread *debugger ) resume_process( process ); return 0; } + process->create_flags |= DEBUG_ONLY_THIS_PROCESS; return 1; error: --- snip --- And yes, the patch (snippet) works as intended (tm) ;-) Attached for sake of completeness is relevant server trace. Search for "001c:trace:seh:raise_exception code=80000003 flags=0 addr=0x7b870ed8 " to the point where the entry system breakpoint is triggered. Regards -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

2 17

[Bug 20230] New: GetThreadTimes() and the Actual and Pseudo Current Thread Handles
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org 11 Feb '21

11 Feb '21

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20230 Summary: GetThreadTimes() and the Actual and Pseudo Current Thread Handles Product: Wine Version: 1.1.30 Platform: PC URL: http://rh-software.com OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ntdll AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: ray(a)pobox.co.uk Some time ago I had an issue with SIV being unable to read the thread CPU time usage when using GetThreadTimes(). I tracked down to the following and then did a work-a-round. The "Current Thread" effectively has 2 current thread handles, these are the actual thread handle and the ~0 pseudo handle as returned by GetCurrentThread(). When a call is made to GetThreadTimes() this calls NtQueryInformationThread( ThreadTimes ) which contains the test "if (handle == GetCurrentThread())". As a result of this when GetThreadTimes() is called with the actual thread handle no data is returned. \WINE-1.1.30\dlls\ntdll\thread.c(1011): if (handle == GetCurrentThread()) I suspect the code should be changed to allow both the pseudo and actual thread handles to be used as a minimum, better still would, when possible, be to implement this function for any thread. While searching the source I also noticed: NTSTATUS WINAPI NtSetInformationThread( HANDLE handle, THREADINFOCLASS class, LPCVOID data, ULONG length ) { NTSTATUS status; switch(class) { case ThreadZeroTlsCell: if (handle == GetCurrentThread()) And suspect that code would benefit from a similar fix. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

2 18

[Bug 23431] New: provide a stub for ntdll.NtSystemDebugControl() (Ollydbg 2.x)
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org 11 Feb '21

11 Feb '21

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23431 Summary: provide a stub for ntdll.NtSystemDebugControl() (Ollydbg 2.x) Product: Wine Version: 1.2-rc5 Platform: x86 URL: http://www.ollydbg.de/version2.html OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ntdll AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: focht(a)gmx.net Hello, a simple one... Ollydbg 2.x uses NtSystemDebugControl( DebugSysReadVirtual, ...) to read kernel memory (driver/OS address space) for informational purposes. Failure to do so doesn't cause harm. Although this approach doesn’t require any additional kernel driver (only the SeDebugPrivilege privilege on the running process) it's only useful for Windows XP systems. It's disallowed since Windows Vista/Windows 7. Not really useful in Wine but it obviously needs a stub. --- snip --- wine: Call from 0x7bc3d2d0 to unimplemented function ntdll.dll.NtSystemDebugControl, aborting First chance exception: unimplemented function ntdll.dll.NtSystemDebugControl called in 32-bit code (0x7bc3d2d0). ... =>0 0x7bc3d2d0 __wine_spec_unimplemented_stub+0x50(module="ntdll.dll", function="NtSystemDebugControl") [/opt/wine/wine-build/dlls/ntdll/../../../wine-git/dlls/ntdll/exception.c:268] in ntdll (0x00334434) 1 0x7bc1f895 __wine_stub_NtSystemDebugControl+0x28() in ntdll (0x00334434) 2 0x004467ae in ollydbg (+0x467ad) (0x00334460) 3 0x0044698b in ollydbg (+0x4698a) (0x00334484) --- snip --- Dump params and return STATUS_NOT_IMPLEMENTED to keep it running ;-) Regards -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

2 6

[Bug 13249] New: Putty: Yes/No/Cancel dialog moving with keyboard arrows
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org 10 Feb '21

10 Feb '21

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13249 Summary: Putty: Yes/No/Cancel dialog moving with keyboard arrows Product: Wine Version: unspecified Platform: Other OS/Version: other Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: trivial Priority: P2 Component: -unknown AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: munozferna(a)gmail.com I was trying to create an automated test for putty, and I noticed that there is a problem between the Cancel and No button on a Yes/No/Cancel dialog. There seem to be '2' controls between them when you move through the buttons with the keyboard arrows. This dialog appears when establishing a connection to a server, putty asks for a confirmation to accept rsa2 keys. I also noticed that the OK / Cancel dialog seems to have 'two' more tabs position, so instead of going to OK when you press arrow key on Cancel, it goes 'nowhere' two times. If you use the tab key it seems to work fine. I am currently using wine-1.0-rc1. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

2 25

[Bug 16058] New: thumbnail view in total commander does not work correctly
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org 10 Feb '21

10 Feb '21

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16058 Summary: thumbnail view in total commander does not work correctly Product: Wine Version: 0.9.46. Platform: Other OS/Version: other Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: -unknown AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: d-84(a)bk.ru Created an attachment (id=17284) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=17284) thumbnail view thumbnail view in total commander does not work correctly os is ubuntu 7.10, wine is 0.9.46-0ubuntu1 total commander is 7.02a and 7.01. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

2 3

[Bug 22676] New: The icon of some applications does not show up in the Gnome panel (affects Total Commander 7.50a,=?UTF-8?Q?=20=C2=B5Torrent=202?=.0.1)
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org 10 Feb '21

10 Feb '21

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22676 Summary: The icon of some applications does not show up in the Gnome panel (affects Total Commander 7.50a, µTorrent 2.0.1) Product: Wine Version: 1.1.43 Platform: x86-64 URL: http://www.ghisler.com/amazons3.php OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: minor Priority: P2 Component: -unknown AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: alexandru.balut(a)gmail.com Created an attachment (id=27926) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=27926) Wine apps as they show up in Window List in the Gnome panel Start Total Commander 7.50a, notice the application appears in the Window List component of the Gnome panel, but it has no icon. (See screenshot). Same happens with uTorrent 2.0.1. Foobar2000 1.0 works fine. Ubuntu 10.04 64 and Ubuntu 9.10 64. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

2 10

[Bug 22693] New: Total Commander: Invisible controls in a dialog window get focus when pressing RIGHT
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org 10 Feb '21

10 Feb '21

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22693 Summary: Total Commander: Invisible controls in a dialog window get focus when pressing RIGHT Product: Wine Version: 1.1.44 Platform: x86-64 URL: http://www.ghisler.com/amazons3.php OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: trivial Priority: P2 Component: -unknown AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: alexandru.balut(a)gmail.com Created an attachment (id=27960) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=27960) Screenshot of dialog window which appears when pressing DEL in Total Commander - Press DEL to delete a file, notice a dialog window appears asking "Do you really want to delete ...?", and the Yes button is focused (see attached screenshot). - Pressing RIGHT (5 times) produces the following results: 1. The No button is focused 2. None of the buttons is focused! 3. None of the buttons is focused! 4. The Cancel button is focused 5. The Yes button is focused This behavior is different than on Vista, where pressing RIGHT (3 times) produces: 1. The No button is focused 2. The Cancel button is focused 3. The Yes button is focused Some more info: On Vista, pressing TAB in this context has the same effect as pressing RIGHT. In Wine, pressing TAB in this context works fine (similar to Vista). Total Commander 7.50a wine-1.1.44 Ubuntu 10.04 64 -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

2 10

[Bug 22845] New: Total Commander: Application crashes when trying to display system information
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org 10 Feb '21

10 Feb '21

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22845 Summary: Total Commander: Application crashes when trying to display system information Product: Wine Version: 1.1.44 Platform: x86-64 URL: http://www.ghisler.com/amazons3.php OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: -unknown AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: alexandru.balut(a)gmail.com Created an attachment (id=28211) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=28211) Console log (showing that a stack overflow happened) Start Total Commander, go to menu Commands -> System Information..., notice the application crashes. Total Commander 7.50a Ubuntu 10.04 64 -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

2 8

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

wine-bugs November 2010