http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31787
Bug #: 31787
Summary: Run the tests in Wine
Product: Wine-Testbot
Version: unspecified
Platform: x86
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: unknown
AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org
ReportedBy: fgouget(a)codeweavers.com
Classification: Unclassified
The Wine TestBot runs the conformance tests on Windows VMs before they are
committed to Wine. This greatly helped improve the quality of our conformance
tests.
The next step is making sure that the conformance tests work reliably in Wine
too, and that Wine patches don't break them. The hope is that this will help us
improve the state of the WineTest results:
http://test.winehq.org/data/
Doing so will be much more processor intensive than the current process:
* Currently only the conformance test patches are tested whereas we would need
to test almost every single patch (we could ignore some documentation patches
for instance).
* Currently we only have to generate a binary for the one conformance test
that's impacted. That's quick. Testing all Wine patches will require
recompiling Wine every time which takes more time, even with ccache.
* A Wine patch can have wide-ranging effects. For instance a patch to ntdll
could impact pretty much any conformance test. That means rerunning all of them
for every patch... unless we find reliable ways of pruning them (patches to
conformance tests would be an obvious optimization).
* Like for Windows we will need to test various configurations: different
locales; 32, 64 and 32+64 bit Wine builds; different sound backends; possibly
different Linux distributions; if possible FreeBSD and Solaris too (I'm leaving
Mac OS X for another bug). In some cases the same binaries can be used for
multiple tests (e.g. if only the locale changes) but in other cases not.
* Also for the current Wine TestBot an unreliable test only impacts people
modifying that test. But the above point means an unreliable test would impact
most Wine patches, leading to lots of patches being rejected. So this means
unreliable tests become a big issue and need to be handled in some way: fixed
or blacklisted or still run but not considered cause for rejection (so one can
notice when they get fixed).
Then there is the question of whether this should be done by modifying the Wine
TestBot or by using the BuildBot framework:
http://trac.buildbot.net/wiki/AboutBuildbot
Dan Kegel produced a proof of concept system based on BuildBot:
http://wiki.winehq.org/BuildBot
An issue is that without significant integration work, having both a
WineTestBot and BuildBot system would be annoying:
* The Wine TestBot currently has its own user database and BuildBot would add
another one. So it would be one more login to manage for developers unless we
manage to integrate either with another user database (e.g. through LDAP).
* Developers would have to submit patches to both sites and check the results
on both.
* Integration with the Wine Patches site (http://source.winehq.org/patches/)
would need to work with both systems.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33234
Bug #: 33234
Summary: Improve user management
Product: Wine-Testbot
Version: unspecified
Platform: x86
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: unknown
AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org
ReportedBy: fgouget(a)codeweavers.com
Classification: Unclassified
When an account request is sent to a WineTestBot administrator the URL he gfets
sent to is the UserDetails.pl one but it only has an 'Approve' button, not a
'Reject' one.
This makes it unclear how to reject spam requests for instance (bug 31798), but
this has now been documented. Still, rejecting an application actually requires
going to another page and deleting the provisional account. This should be
simpler: there should be a 'Reject' button right on the UserDetails page that
does that.
Furthermore, the status of the account, 'Pending approval' and 'Pending
activation', should be clearly indicated both on the UserDetails page and on
the UsersList page.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32216
Bug #: 32216
Summary: WienTestBot should skip some tests on some platforms
Product: Wine-Testbot
Version: unspecified
Platform: x86
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: unknown
AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org
ReportedBy: fgouget(a)codeweavers.com
Classification: Unclassified
An example is the ieframe:webbrowser tests which it should skip on NT4 and
Windows 2000 platforms. WineTest.exe is said to already have the necessary code
somewhere, it's just missing from TestLauncher.
See this wine-devel thread for more details:
http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/2012-November/097819.html
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27453
Summary: Lag when loading new sound in source games
Product: Wine
Version: 1.3.21
Platform: x86
OS/Version: Linux
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: -unknown
AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org
ReportedBy: congelli501(a)gmail.com
When you start a level in a game powered by valve's source engine, sounds that
are played for the first time since the game was launched will cause the game
to lag.
Ex: open a new portal for the first time in a Portal2 level.
Affects:
- Portal 2
- Left 4 Dead 2
- Probably more...
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10219
Summary: Windows Media Player 11 setup fails
Product: Wine
Version: 0.9.48.
Platform: PC
URL: http://www.microsoft.com/windows/windowsmedia/download/A
llDownloads.aspx?displang=en&qstechnology=
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Keywords: download, Installer
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: wine-misc
AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org
ReportedBy: alex(a)thehandofagony.com
The setup program for Windows Media Player 11 tries to validate Windows if the
version is set to XP, and this fails. There was talk some time ago about an
ntlm_auth patch that would allow the validation, but it fails for me even
though I have the correct version of Samba installed.
However, the installer does not run the Genuine check if the Windows version is
set to Vista. When run thus it does work, however; it tries to create an
instance of a wuapi.dll class, which is not registered in Wine. When I use a
native dll from XP and register it the console output changes saying no
instance could be created.
The installer then says no updates could be found.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14547
Summary: Problem with loading of windows from Java applications
Product: Wine
Version: 1.1.1
Platform: Other
OS/Version: other
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: -unknown
AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org
ReportedBy: yolande(a)haneder.biz
Created an attachment (id=14894)
--> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=14894)
Files for the test case
We made a test case to show that child windows for Java applications (written
in a class are not appearing) are problematic.
To start the test, you have to install Java on Wine (I tested with java1.5-10)
and start file in the /bin directory of the java installation directory.
What is expected (showing during tests on Windows XP):
There is a mainframe called "Using a JDesktopPane"
Then a row in the main body of the main frame called "Add"
Then a child window called "Internal frame"
Result in Wine:
Totally black screen with only the part with the word "Add" to be visible.
Through hovering the mouse over the black part, you can restore most parts of
your desktop to access other windows.
If you need the source code of any of the file, you just need to ask.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21764
Summary: Sun JRE (jre-6u16-windows-i586-s) installation failure
Product: Wine
Version: unspecified
Platform: x86
URL: http://java.sun.com/products/archive/j2se/6u16/index.h
tml
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Keywords: download, regression
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: msi
AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org
ReportedBy: bunglehead(a)gmail.com
Sun JRE 6update16 fails to install with 1.1.39. It's a regression and a commit
to blame is 1ff992314887d03abeb4098789701ff3bfd5d2d8:
msi: Add summary information stream to the streams table.
Reverting helps.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22024
Summary: sun jre installation (jre-6u18-windows-i586.exe)
Product: Wine
Version: 1.1.40
Platform: x86
OS/Version: Linux
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Priority: P2
Component: ntoskrnl
AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org
ReportedBy: samuele_catuzzi(a)yahoo.it
Created an attachment (id=26779)
--> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=26779)
wine jre-6u18-windows-i586 install crash
Several crash and register dump during install
Ubunutu 9.10 x86_64
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14750
Summary: comctl32: Fixed rebar behaviour when there's capture and
no drag
Product: Wine
Version: CVS/GIT
Platform: Other
OS/Version: other
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P2
Component: richedit
AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org
ReportedBy: bugzilla(a)tut.by
Created an attachment (id=15249)
--> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=15249)
comctl32: Fixed rebar behaviour when there's capture and no drag
ERR() here causes some applications (i.e. ISIS/Proteus) to crash when mouse
moves over rebar. This patch fixes this behaviour.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24514
Summary: LVM_SUBITEMHITTEST fails on Chinese and Japanese
Versions of XP
Product: Wine
Version: 1.3.3
Platform: x86
OS/Version: Linux
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: comctl32
AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org
ReportedBy: austin.lund(a)gmail.com
In the test_hittest function for the listview test the following test fails for
the Chinese and Japanese versions on the test bot:
/* subitem returned with -1 item too */
x = pos.x + 150;
y = -10;
test_lvm_subitemhittest(hwnd, x, y, -1, 1, LVHT_NOWHERE, FALSE, FALSE, FALSE);
The failures read:
listview.c:3056: Test failed: Expected -1 retval, got -2
listview.c:3056: Test failed: Expected -1 item, got -2
listview.c:3056: Test failed: Expected flags 0x1, got 0x4
This basically says that the message returned -2 (undocumented ?) and set the
flags to LVHT_ONITEMLABEL.
Is y = -10 relative to the control client area or the parent window? How can
you be on the item label in either case? Should the above values be added as
successes to this test?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.