wine-bugs May 2014

wine-bugs@winehq.org

1 participants
10094 discussions

[Bug 28687] New: Common replies strips newlines when submitting
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org 26 Jul '17

26 Jul '17

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28687 Bug #: 28687 Summary: Common replies strips newlines when submitting Product: WineHQ Apps Database Version: unspecified Platform: x86-64 URL: http://appdb.winehq.org/objectManager.php?sClass=Commo nReply OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: download, source Severity: trivial Priority: P2 Component: appdb-unknown AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: kennybobs(a)o2.co.uk Classification: Unclassified Common replies strips newlines when submitting. To recreate: 1. Go to Edit Common Replies. 2. Click to edit a common reply and hit enter to add some newlines between sentences. 3. Click submit. Newlines are removed. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

1 7

[Bug 12927] New: Flat comment mode does not display any replies
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org 26 Jul '17

26 Jul '17

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12927 Summary: Flat comment mode does not display any replies Product: WineHQ Apps Database Version: unspecified Platform: Other OS/Version: other Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: appdb-unknown AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: MattFinn(a)gmail.com When i view the comments in "flat" mode, the replies are all just missing completely, instead of showing up as new entries like I would imagine is appropriate. There is no mention of their existence. Should be easily reproducible, just click to "flat". If not, then the page I was on is "http://appdb.winehq.org/objectManager.php?sClass=version&iId=9901". -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

1 5

[Bug 24497] New: Adding distributions is far too easy
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org 25 Jul '17

25 Jul '17

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24497 Summary: Adding distributions is far too easy Product: WineHQ Bugzilla Version: unspecified Platform: x86 OS/Version: other Status: NEW Severity: trivial Priority: P2 Component: bugzilla-unknown AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: kennybobs(a)o2.co.uk Every day someone adds another duplicate distribution or something that isn't a distribution at all, despite how easy it is to pick from the drop-down list, and has to be merged by an admin. Approving submitted distributions should be done by admin only, or it should be made more obvious that a distro has been submitted in a test result (if possible). -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

1 10

[Bug 27378] New: New distributions submitted in test reports are added even if the admin deletes them when processing
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org 25 Jul '17

25 Jul '17

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27378 Summary: New distributions submitted in test reports are added even if the admin deletes them when processing Product: WineHQ Apps Database Version: unspecified Platform: x86 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: appdb-unknown AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: dimesio(a)earthlink.net Users have a penchant for submitting "new" distributions that already have entries in the AppDB (bug 24497). The form admins and maintainers see when processing test reports notes when the user has added a new distribution, and states that it will be added to the database unless the admin/maintainer selects an existing one from the list. However, even if I do select a distribution from the list and delete the "new" distribution from the test form when processing it, the "new" distribution is still added to the database and has to be manually removed afterwards. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

1 7

[Bug 36612] New: valgrind shows a definite leak in winhttp/tests/notification.c
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org 21 Jul '17

21 Jul '17

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36612 Bug ID: 36612 Summary: valgrind shows a definite leak in winhttp/tests/notification.c Product: Wine Version: 1.7.19 Hardware: x86 OS: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: download, source, testcase Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: winhttp Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: austinenglish(a)gmail.com ==8903== 20 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 57 of 299 ==8903== at 0x7BC4C6DF: notify_alloc (heap.c:255) ==8903== by 0x7BC50F23: RtlAllocateHeap (heap.c:1716) ==8903== by 0x4F97C37: heap_alloc (winhttp_private.h:320) ==8903== by 0x4F9EED9: WinHttpReadData (request.c:2496) ==8903== by 0x4E50D9C: test_async (notification.c:460) ==8903== by 0x4E50E85: func_notification (notification.c:479) ==8903== by 0x4E6AC75: run_test (test.h:584) ==8903== by 0x4E6B064: main (test.h:654) ==8903== -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 4

[Bug 36613] New: valgrind shows an unintialized write in winhttp/tests/notification.c
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org 21 Jul '17

21 Jul '17

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36613 Bug ID: 36613 Summary: valgrind shows an unintialized write in winhttp/tests/notification.c Product: Wine Version: 1.7.19 Hardware: x86 OS: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: download, source, testcase Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: -unknown Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: austinenglish(a)gmail.com ../../../tools/runtest -q -P wine -T ../../.. -M winhttp.dll -p winhttp_test.exe.so notification && touch notification.ok preloader: Warning: failed to reserve range 00110000-68000000 preloader: Warning: failed to reserve range 7f000000-82000000 ==28055== Thread 2: ==28055== Syscall param write(buf) points to uninitialised byte(s) ==28055== at 0x4226D1B: ??? (syscall-template.S:81) ==28055== by 0x7BC7FD72: send_request (server.c:198) ==28055== by 0x7BC7FF91: wine_server_call (server.c:294) ==28055== by 0x7BC890FC: NtSetEvent (sync.c:361) ==28055== by 0x7B87723E: SetEvent (sync.c:572) ==28055== by 0x4CA543A: check_notification (notification.c:120) ==28055== by 0x4E24DA0: send_callback (session.c:75) ==28055== by 0x4E1645A: release_object (handle.c:81) ==28055== by 0x4E26110: request_destroy (session.c:559) ==28055== by 0x4E164D2: release_object (handle.c:85) ==28055== by 0x4E19EE3: task_thread (request.c:186) ==28055== by 0x7BC90A24: worker_thread_proc (threadpool.c:110) ==28055== by 0x7BC870C7: ??? (signal_i386.c:2571) ==28055== by 0x7BC87110: call_thread_func (signal_i386.c:2630) ==28055== by 0x7BC870A5: ??? (signal_i386.c:2571) ==28055== by 0x7BC8E4EC: start_thread (thread.c:428) ==28055== by 0x421FF92: start_thread (pthread_create.c:309) ==28055== by 0x43247ED: clone (clone.S:129) ==28055== Address 0x62ce700 is on thread 1's stack ==28055== Uninitialised value was created by a stack allocation ==28055== at 0x7BC7FF56: wine_server_call (server.c:288) ==28055== -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 6

[Bug 32418] New: Skylanders Spyro's Adventure can't find USB RFID reader
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org 21 Jul '17

21 Jul '17

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32418 Bug #: 32418 Summary: Skylanders Spyro's Adventure can't find USB RFID reader Product: Wine Version: 1.5.19 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: -unknown AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: reedstrm(a)gmail.com Classification: Unclassified Created attachment 42766 --> http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=42766 lsusb -v output for portal usb device Skylanders is a game that uses character toys w/ RFID chips to determine your player i nthe game, and store character stats. The original game came w/ a PC version, which this is. Installation and SecureROM DRM all work, to the point of needing the reader. The reader presents as a USB HID device. There exists a downloadable character editor that has been reverse engineered from the web-flash game portal driver. The editor fails under wine with: unimplemented function hid.dll.HidD_SetOutputReport I'm a long time wine user, but haven't developed with it. If some one can give me some assistance, I can walk though providing appropriate debug and backtrace reports. Note that the game proper does not fail as above. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

1 13

[Bug 9654] New: Links from http://appdb.winehq.org/ always open in the same window
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org 21 Jul '17

21 Jul '17

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9654 Summary: Links from http://appdb.winehq.org/ always open in the same window Product: WineHQ Bugzilla Version: unspecified Platform: Other URL: http://appdb.winehq.org/ OS/Version: other Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: misc-bugs AssignedTo: jnewman(a)codeweavers.com ReportedBy: acheron(a)front.ru Shift-clicking (or Control-clicking) on some links in Firefox with JavaScrippt on results in the link opening both in the new window (or tab) and in the old window. Observed on e.g. "Top-10" lists. This is inconvenient. I may be wrong (I'm not good at HTML and Javascript) but I think the reason is having both onclick="DoNav('...') and href="..." pointing to the same page. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

1 13

[Bug 15947] New: appdb no way to edit vendor
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org 21 Jul '17

21 Jul '17

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15947 Summary: appdb no way to edit vendor Product: WineHQ Apps Database Version: unspecified Platform: Other OS/Version: other Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: appdb-unknown AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: a.hurst(a)shef.ac.uk After submitting a new app (Utilities/VLtools) along with its vendor (Digifly), I realised I had no way to correct the error I made in the URL for the Vendor (missing http://) Should the user who submitted a new Vendor have the power to edit it? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

1 8

[Bug 35563] New: GetProcessMemoryInfo() is unimplemented
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org 20 Jul '17

20 Jul '17

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35563 Bug ID: 35563 Summary: GetProcessMemoryInfo() is unimplemented Product: Wine Version: 1.7.12 Hardware: x86 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ntdll Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: achurch+wine(a)achurch.org Classification: Unclassified Despite bug 13302, GetProcessMemoryInfo() is still effectively unimplemented, in that it returns zero in all fields instead of actual data. The missing code is in the underlying ntdll call, NtQueryInformationProcess(ProcessVmCounters): (see http://source.winehq.org/source/dlls/ntdll/process.c#L231) case ProcessVmCounters: { VM_COUNTERS pvmi; [...] /* FIXME : real data */ memset(&pvmi, 0 , sizeof(VM_COUNTERS)); Test program (compile with -lpsapi): #include <assert.h> #include <windows.h> #include <psapi.h> int main(int argc, char **argv) { PROCESS_MEMORY_COUNTERS pmc; assert(GetProcessMemoryInfo(GetCurrentProcess(), &pmc, sizeof(pmc))); assert(pmc.WorkingSetSize > 0); return 0; } -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 24

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

wine-bugs May 2014