https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36137
Bug ID: 36137
Summary: valgrind shows some leaks in oleaut32/tests/tmarshal.c
Product: Wine
Version: 1.7.17
Hardware: x86
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Keywords: download, source, testcase
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: oleaut32
Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org
Reporter: austinenglish(a)gmail.com
==31591== 8 bytes in 1 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 45 of 638
==31591== at 0x7BC4C735: notify_alloc (heap.c:255)
==31591== by 0x7BC50F79: RtlAllocateHeap (heap.c:1716)
==31591== by 0x7B84586B: HeapAlloc (heap.c:271)
==31591== by 0x7B845B40: GlobalAlloc (heap.c:376)
==31591== by 0x5461F06: CreateStreamOnHGlobal (hglobalstream.c:603)
==31591== by 0x4C73817: test_external_connection (tmarshal.c:1873)
==31591== by 0x4C741F7: func_tmarshal (tmarshal.c:1952)
==31591== by 0x4D75F00: run_test (test.h:584)
==31591== by 0x4D762EF: main (test.h:654)
==31591== 72 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 355 of 638
==31591== at 0x7BC4C735: notify_alloc (heap.c:255)
==31591== by 0x7BC5161A: RtlReAllocateHeap (heap.c:1883)
==31591== by 0x7B8458E5: HeapReAlloc (heap.c:281)
==31591== by 0x7B846646: GlobalReAlloc (heap.c:679)
==31591== by 0x5461912: HGLOBALStreamImpl_SetSize (hglobalstream.c:381)
==31591== by 0x54615AD: HGLOBALStreamImpl_Write (objidl.h:4391)
==31591== by 0x5469938: StdMarshalImpl_MarshalInterface (objidl.h:4384)
==31591== by 0x546B65D: CoMarshalInterface (objidl.h:611)
==31591== by 0x4C73897: test_external_connection (tmarshal.c:1877)
==31591== by 0x4C741F7: func_tmarshal (tmarshal.c:1952)
==31591== by 0x4D75F00: run_test (test.h:584)
==31591== by 0x4D762EF: main (test.h:654)
==31591== 32 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 230 of 638
==31591== at 0x7BC4C735: notify_alloc (heap.c:255)
==31591== by 0x7BC50F79: RtlAllocateHeap (heap.c:1716)
==31591== by 0x4FF22D2: deserialize_param (tmarshal.c:1201)
==31591== by 0x4FF3941: xCall (tmarshal.c:1482)
==31591== by 0x6E701B2: ???
==31591== by 0x4C741E3: func_tmarshal (tmarshal.c:1948)
==31591== by 0x4D75F00: run_test (test.h:584)
==31591== by 0x4D762EF: main (test.h:654)
==31928== 32 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 230 of 639
==31928== at 0x7BC4C735: notify_alloc (heap.c:255)
==31928== by 0x7BC50F79: RtlAllocateHeap (heap.c:1716)
==31928== by 0x4FD80FA: alloc_bstr (oleaut.c:162)
==31928== by 0x4FD8490: SysAllocStringLen (oleaut.c:324)
==31928== by 0x4FD81A7: SysAllocString (oleaut.c:232)
==31928== by 0x4C6FAB0: test_typelibmarshal (tmarshal.c:1327)
==31928== by 0x4C741E3: func_tmarshal (tmarshal.c:1948)
==31928== by 0x4D75F00: run_test (test.h:584)
==31928== by 0x4D762EF: main (test.h:654)
==31928==
==32011== 28 bytes in 1 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 185 of 637
==32011== at 0x7BC4C735: notify_alloc (heap.c:255)
==32011== by 0x7BC50F79: RtlAllocateHeap (heap.c:1716)
==32011== by 0x53FD8B6: COMPOBJ_DllList_Add (compobj.c:526)
==32011== by 0x53FFBF2: apartment_getclassobject (compobj.c:1335)
==32011== by 0x540333C: get_inproc_class_object (compobj.c:2894)
==32011== by 0x54037FB: CoGetClassObject (compobj.c:3032)
==32011== by 0x54265B1: get_facbuf_for_iid (marshal.c:114)
==32011== by 0x54266E7: marshal_object (marshal.c:151)
==32011== by 0x5460599: start_apartment_remote_unknown (stubmanager.c:804)
==32011== by 0x5441BF6: RPC_StartRemoting (rpc.c:1645)
==32011== by 0x5429867: StdMarshalImpl_MarshalInterface (marshal.c:1249)
==32011== by 0x542B65D: CoMarshalInterface (objidl.h:611)
==32011== by 0x4C37CEE: host_object_proc (tmarshal.c:79)
==32011== by 0x7BC87087: ??? (signal_i386.c:2571)
==32011== by 0x7BC870D0: call_thread_func (signal_i386.c:2630)
==32011== by 0x7BC87065: ??? (signal_i386.c:2571)
==32011== by 0x7BC8E4B0: start_thread (thread.c:428)
==32011== by 0x4EA7BD89: start_thread (in /usr/lib/libpthread-2.18.so)
==32011== by 0x4E95CA0D: clone (in /usr/lib/libc-2.18.so)
==32011== 28 bytes in 1 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 186 of 637
==32011== at 0x7BC4C735: notify_alloc (heap.c:255)
==32011== by 0x7BC50F79: RtlAllocateHeap (heap.c:1716)
==32011== by 0x53FD8B6: COMPOBJ_DllList_Add (compobj.c:526)
==32011== by 0x53FFBF2: apartment_getclassobject (compobj.c:1335)
==32011== by 0x540333C: get_inproc_class_object (compobj.c:2894)
==32011== by 0x54037FB: CoGetClassObject (compobj.c:3032)
==32011== by 0x54265B1: get_facbuf_for_iid (marshal.c:114)
==32011== by 0x54266E7: marshal_object (marshal.c:151)
==32011== by 0x542989C: StdMarshalImpl_MarshalInterface (marshal.c:1251)
==32011== by 0x542B65D: CoMarshalInterface (objidl.h:611)
==32011== by 0x4C37CEE: host_object_proc (tmarshal.c:79)
==32011== by 0x7BC87087: ??? (signal_i386.c:2571)
==32011== by 0x7BC870D0: call_thread_func (signal_i386.c:2630)
==32011== by 0x7BC87065: ??? (signal_i386.c:2571)
==32011== by 0x7BC8E4B0: start_thread (thread.c:428)
==32011== by 0x4EA7BD89: start_thread (in /usr/lib/libpthread-2.18.so)
==32011== by 0x4E95CA0D: clone (in /usr/lib/libc-2.18.so)
==32011==
--
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36403
Bug ID: 36403
Summary: valgrind shows a possible leak in dsound/tests/ds3d8.c
Product: Wine
Version: 1.7.17
Hardware: x86
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Keywords: download, source, testcase
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: directx-dsound
Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org
Reporter: austinenglish(a)gmail.com
==14489== 28 bytes in 1 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 220 of 926
==14489== at 0x7BC508EB: RtlAllocateHeap (heap.c:255)
==14489== by 0x51F2BE8: apartment_getclassobject (compobj.c:526)
==14489== by 0x51F5FF6: get_inproc_class_object (compobj.c:2894)
==14489== by 0x51F8D5F: CoGetClassObject (compobj.c:3032)
==14489== by 0x51F94E7: CoCreateInstance (compobj.c:3197)
==14489== by 0x65376E2: get_mmdevenum (dsound_main.c:178)
==14489== by 0x6538A42: enumerate_mmdevices (dsound_main.c:466)
==14489== by 0x6538D8D: DirectSoundEnumerateW (dsound_main.c:561)
==14489== by 0x6538E61: DirectSoundEnumerateA (dsound_main.c:349)
==14489== by 0x4AC54B8: func_ds3d8 (ds3d8.c:1137)
==14489== by 0x4AB820B: main (test.h:584)
==14489==
--
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36322
Bug ID: 36322
Summary: valgrind shows a leak in rpcrpc4/tests/cstub.c
Product: Wine
Version: 1.7.18
Hardware: x86
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Keywords: download, source, testcase
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: rpc
Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org
Reporter: austinenglish(a)gmail.com
==32691== 24 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 155 of 562
==32691== at 0x7BC4C735: notify_alloc (heap.c:255)
==32691== by 0x7BC50F79: RtlAllocateHeap (heap.c:1716)
==32691== by 0x55C045F: CStdStubBuffer_Construct (cstub.c:88)
==32691== by 0x55BF517: CStdPSFactory_CreateStub (cpsf.c:135)
==32691== by 0x495AD74: create_stub (objidl.h:9251)
==32691== by 0x495B861: test_Connect (cstub.c:867)
==32691== by 0x495C5C5: func_cstub (cstub.c:1174)
==32691== by 0x4995124: run_test (test.h:584)
==32691== by 0x4995513: main (test.h:654)
==32691==
--
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36433
Bug ID: 36433
Summary: valgrind shows a couple leaks in
shell32/tests/shelldispatch.c
Product: Wine
Version: 1.7.18
Hardware: x86
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Keywords: download, source, testcase
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: shell32
Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org
Reporter: austinenglish(a)gmail.com
==28557== 24 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 165 of 615
==28557== at 0x7BC50A9B: RtlAllocateHeap (heap.c:255)
==28557== by 0x4F5C378: ShellDispatch_NameSpace (shelldispatch.c:774)
==28557== by 0x4D8817A: func_shelldispatch (shldisp.h:3077)
==28557== by 0x4DC8888: run_test (test.h:584)
==28557== by 0x4DC8C77: main (test.h:654)
==28557==
==28557== 28 bytes in 1 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 174 of 615
==28557== at 0x7BC50A9B: RtlAllocateHeap (heap.c:255)
==28557== by 0x5C44BB8: apartment_getclassobject (compobj.c:526)
==28557== by 0x5C47FC6: get_inproc_class_object (compobj.c:2894)
==28557== by 0x5C4AD2F: CoGetClassObject (compobj.c:3032)
==28557== by 0x5C4B4B7: CoCreateInstance (compobj.c:3197)
==28557== by 0x4D87FE2: func_shelldispatch (shelldispatch.c:72)
==28557== by 0x4DC8888: run_test (test.h:584)
==28557== by 0x4DC8C77: main (test.h:654)
==28557==
--
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36402
Bug ID: 36402
Summary: valgrind shows several leaks in dsound/tests/duplex.c
Product: Wine
Version: 1.7.18
Hardware: x86
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Keywords: download, source, testcase
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: directx-dsound
Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org
Reporter: austinenglish(a)gmail.com
==32429== 88,200 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 822 of
822
==32429== at 0x7BC508EB: RtlAllocateHeap (heap.c:255)
==32429== by 0x652CEF2: IDirectSoundCaptureImpl_CreateCaptureBuffer
(capture.c:797)
==32429== by 0x6536497: IDirectSoundFullDuplexImpl_Initialize (duplex.c:233)
==32429== by 0x4AAF23D: func_duplex (duplex.c:286)
==32429== by 0x4A9520B: main (test.h:584)
==32429==
--
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26110
Summary: ole32/marshal test shows several valgrind warnings
Product: Wine
Version: 1.3.13
Platform: x86
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Keywords: download, source, testcase
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: ole32
AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org
ReportedBy: austinenglish(a)gmail.com
Created an attachment (id=33290)
--> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=33290)
valgrind log
Syscall param write(buf) points to uninitialised byte(s)
at ??? (in /lib/libpthread-2.11.2.so)
by WriteFile (file.c:547)
by rpcrt4_conn_np_write (rpc_transport.c:441)
by rpcrt4_conn_write (rpc_binding.h:183)
by RPCRT4_SendWithAuth (rpc_message.c:849)
by RPCRT4_Send (rpc_message.c:1245)
by process_request_packet (rpc_server.c:463)
by RPCRT4_process_packet (rpc_server.c:518)
by RPCRT4_worker_thread (rpc_server.c:540)
by worker_thread_proc (threadpool.c:114)
by ??? (signal_i386.c:2473)
by call_thread_entry_point (signal_i386.c:2499)
by start_thread (thread.c:404)
by start_thread (in /lib/libpthread-2.11.2.so)
by clone (in /lib/libc-2.11.2.so)
Address 0x7f030894 is 44 bytes inside a block of size 92 alloc'd
at notify_alloc (heap.c:254)
by RtlAllocateHeap (heap.c:1701)
by RPCRT4_SendWithAuth (rpc_message.c:808)
by RPCRT4_Send (rpc_message.c:1245)
by process_request_packet (rpc_server.c:463)
by RPCRT4_process_packet (rpc_server.c:518)
by RPCRT4_worker_thread (rpc_server.c:540)
by worker_thread_proc (threadpool.c:114)
by ??? (signal_i386.c:2473)
by call_thread_entry_point (signal_i386.c:2499)
by start_thread (thread.c:404)
by start_thread (in /lib/libpthread-2.11.2.so)
by clone (in /lib/libc-2.11.2.so)
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
at mark_block_uninitialized (heap.c:208)
by initialize_block (heap.c:239)
by RtlAllocateHeap (heap.c:1702)
by IMalloc_fnAlloc (ifs.c:186)
by CoTaskMemAlloc (ifs.c:395)
by RemUnknown_RemQueryInterface (stubmanager.c:664)
by IRemUnknown_RemQueryInterface_Stub (dcom_p.c:370)
by CStdStubBuffer_Invoke (cstub.c:477)
by RPC_ExecuteCall (rpc.c:1414)
by apartment_wndproc (compobj.c:897)
by ??? (winproc.c:172)
by call_window_proc (winproc.c:242)
by WINPROC_CallProcAtoW (winproc.c:601)
by WINPROC_call_window (winproc.c:910)
by DispatchMessageA (message.c:3639)
by test_register_local_server (marshal.c:2625)
by func_marshal (marshal.c:3067)
by run_test (test.h:556)
by main (test.h:624)
...
24 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost
at notify_alloc (heap.c:254)
by RtlAllocateHeap (heap.c:1701)
by IDefClF_fnConstructor (shellole.c:386)
by DllGetClassObject (shellole.c:219)
by apartment_getclassobject (compobj.c:806)
by apartment_hostobject (compobj.c:879)
by apartment_wndproc (compobj.c:900)
by ??? (winproc.c:172)
by call_window_proc (winproc.c:242)
by WINPROC_call_window (winproc.c:899)
by call_window_proc (message.c:2201)
by peek_message (message.c:2775)
by GetMessageW (message.c:3511)
by apartment_hostobject_thread (compobj.c:942)
by ??? (signal_i386.c:2473)
by call_thread_entry_point (signal_i386.c:2499)
by start_thread (thread.c:404)
by start_thread (in /lib/libpthread-2.11.2.so)
by clone (in /lib/libc-2.11.2.so)
...
68 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost
at notify_alloc (heap.c:254)
by RtlAllocateHeap (heap.c:1701)
by ClientRpcChannelBuffer_GetBuffer (rpc.c:634)
by NdrProxyGetBuffer (cproxy.c:395)
by IRemUnknown_RemRelease_Proxy (dcom_p.c:631)
by ifproxy_release_public_refs (marshal.c:673)
by ifproxy_destroy (marshal.c:708)
by proxy_manager_destroy (marshal.c:1109)
by ClientIdentity_Release (marshal.c:268)
by IUnknown_Release_Proxy (cproxy.c:361)
by test_no_couninitialize_server (marshal.c:894)
by func_marshal (marshal.c:3095)
by run_test (test.h:556)
by main (test.h:624)
...
72 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost
at notify_alloc (heap.c:254)
by RtlAllocateHeap (heap.c:1701)
by I_RpcAllocate (rpcrt4_main.c:705)
by I_RpcGetBuffer (rpc_message.c:1647)
by ClientRpcChannelBuffer_GetBuffer (rpc.c:721)
by NdrProxyGetBuffer (cproxy.c:395)
by IRemUnknown_RemRelease_Proxy (dcom_p.c:631)
by ifproxy_release_public_refs (marshal.c:673)
by ifproxy_destroy (marshal.c:708)
by proxy_manager_destroy (marshal.c:1109)
by ClientIdentity_Release (marshal.c:268)
by IUnknown_Release_Proxy (cproxy.c:361)
by test_marshal_stub_apartment_shutdown (marshal.c:744)
by func_marshal (marshal.c:3092)
by run_test (test.h:556)
by main (test.h:624)
...
116 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost
at notify_alloc (heap.c:254)
by RtlAllocateHeap (heap.c:1701)
by ClientRpcChannelBuffer_GetBuffer (rpc.c:638)
by NdrProxyGetBuffer (cproxy.c:395)
by IRemUnknown_RemRelease_Proxy (dcom_p.c:631)
by ifproxy_release_public_refs (marshal.c:673)
by ifproxy_destroy (marshal.c:708)
by proxy_manager_destroy (marshal.c:1109)
by ClientIdentity_Release (marshal.c:268)
by IUnknown_Release_Proxy (cproxy.c:361)
by test_no_couninitialize_server (marshal.c:894)
by func_marshal (marshal.c:3095)
by run_test (test.h:556)
by main (test.h:624)
and several possibly losts as well. Full log attached.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36397
Bug ID: 36397
Summary: valgrind shows a couple warnings in
ieframe/tests/intshcut.c
Product: Wine
Version: 1.7.18
Hardware: x86
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Keywords: download, source, testcase
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: -unknown
Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org
Reporter: austinenglish(a)gmail.com
../../../tools/runtest -q -P wine -T ../../.. -M ieframe.dll -p
ieframe_test.exe.so intshcut && touch intshcut.ok
preloader: Warning: failed to reserve range 00110000-68000000
preloader: Warning: failed to reserve range 7f000000-82000000
fixme:ntdll:NtLockFile I/O completion on lock not implemented yet
fixme:ole:CoCreateInstance Class {fbf23b40-e3f0-101b-8488-00aa003e56f8} does
not support aggregation
fixme:ieframe:UniformResourceLocatorA_SetUrl ignoring unsupported flags 0x1
fixme:ieframe:UniformResourceLocatorA_SetUrl ignoring unsupported flags 0x1
preloader: Warning: failed to reserve range 00110000-68000000
preloader: Warning: failed to reserve range 7f000000-82000000
==28304== Syscall param write(buf) points to uninitialised byte(s)
==28304== at 0x421ECF3: __write_nocancel (syscall-template.S:81)
==28304== by 0x7BC48C5A: NtWriteFile (file.c:1073)
==28304== by 0x7B83D0FA: WriteFile (file.c:563)
==28304== by 0x520B8B4: FileLockBytesImpl_WriteAt (filelockbytes.c:286)
==28304== by 0x523858F: StorageImpl_WriteBigBlock (objidl.h:5753)
==28304== by 0x523F1C7: BlockChainStream_Flush (storage32.c:6430)
==28304== by 0x523F20D: StorageImpl_Flush (storage32.c:3284)
==28304== by 0x52376D7: StgStreamImpl_Write (storage32.h:268)
==28304== by 0x5233412: PropertyStorage_WritePropertyToStream
(objidl.h:4384)
==28304== by 0x52337D6: PropertyStorage_PropertiesWriter (stg_prop.c:1861)
==28304== by 0x5209ABB: dictionary_enumerate (dictionary.c:189)
==28304== by 0x523588A: IPropertyStorage_fnCommit (stg_prop.c:1875)
==28304== by 0x4A96E0C: test_ReadAndWriteProperties (propidl.h:540)
==28304== by 0x4A97720: func_intshcut (intshcut.c:390)
==28304== by 0x4A9532B: main (test.h:584)
==28304== Address 0x4c8e8ce is 150 bytes inside a block of size 8,260 alloc'd
==28304== at 0x7BC508EB: RtlAllocateHeap (heap.c:255)
==28304== by 0x523FCD3: BlockChainStream_Construct (storage32.c:6398)
==28304== by 0x5240991: StorageImpl_Construct.isra.29 (storage32.c:3213)
==28304== by 0x524307E: Storage_Construct.isra.34 (storage32.c:5544)
==28304== by 0x5243243: create_storagefile.isra.35 (storage32.c:7768)
==28304== by 0x5243885: StgCreateStorageEx (storage32.c:7862)
==28304== by 0x69716E1: create_shortcut (intshcut.c:820)
==28304== by 0x697297C: InternetShortcut_Create (intshcut.c:855)
==28304== by 0x51F950D: CoCreateInstance (unknwn.h:226)
==28304== by 0x4A966F1: test_ReadAndWriteProperties (intshcut.c:191)
==28304== by 0x4A97720: func_intshcut (intshcut.c:390)
==28304== by 0x4A9532B: main (test.h:584)
==28304== Uninitialised value was created by a stack allocation
==28304== at 0x4A9647F: test_ReadAndWriteProperties (intshcut.c:170)
==28304==
==28304== Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
==28304== at 0x4AA6C35: winetest_vok (test.h:311)
==28304== by 0x4AA6DFA: winetest_ok (test.h:357)
==28304== by 0x4A96A85: test_ReadAndWriteProperties (intshcut.c:269)
==28304== by 0x4A97720: func_intshcut (intshcut.c:390)
==28304== by 0x4A9532B: main (test.h:584)
==28304== Uninitialised value was created by a stack allocation
==28304== at 0x6971816: PersistFile_Load (intshcut.c:456)
==28304==
--
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36315
Bug ID: 36315
Summary: valgrind shows several leaks in qedit/tests/mediadet.c
Product: Wine
Version: 1.7.18
Hardware: x86
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Keywords: download, source, testcase
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: -unknown
Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org
Reporter: austinenglish(a)gmail.com
Created attachment 48402
--> https://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=48402
valgrind log
==31827== 28 bytes in 1 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 239 of 877
==31827== at 0x7BC4C735: notify_alloc (heap.c:255)
==31827== by 0x7BC50F79: RtlAllocateHeap (heap.c:1716)
==31827== by 0x4B5B262: heap_alloc_zero (typelib.c:1662)
==31827== by 0x4B5DEA1: MSFT_ReadAllRefs (typelib.c:2902)
==31827== by 0x4B6014C: ITypeLib2_Constructor_MSFT (typelib.c:3716)
==31827== by 0x4B5F3B8: TLB_ReadTypeLib (typelib.c:3460)
==31827== by 0x4B576DC: LoadTypeLibEx (typelib.c:478)
==31827== by 0x4B57618: LoadTypeLib (typelib.c:454)
==31827== by 0x4B5786A: LoadRegTypeLib (typelib.c:537)
==31827== by 0x6073AD3: ???
==31827== by 0x607A475: ???
==31827== by 0x600A806: ???
==31827== by 0x600AAC0: ???
==31827== by 0x50A3E26: CoCreateInstance (unknwn.h:226)
==31827== by 0x5FADE44: SampleGrabber_create (samplegrabber.c:1304)
==31827== by 0x5FA741F: DSCF_CreateInstance (main.c:110)
==31827== by 0x50A3E26: CoCreateInstance (unknwn.h:226)
==31827== by 0x4956F1F: test_samplegrabber (mediadet.c:388)
==31827== by 0x4957979: func_mediadet (mediadet.c:475)
==31827== by 0x495877C: run_test (test.h:584)
==31827==
==31827== 32 bytes in 1 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 293 of 877
==31827== at 0x7BC4C735: notify_alloc (heap.c:255)
==31827== by 0x7BC50F79: RtlAllocateHeap (heap.c:1716)
==31827== by 0x7BC39AE9: RtlInitializeCriticalSectionEx (critsection.c:326)
==31827== by 0x7B876B51: InitializeCriticalSectionEx (sync.c:356)
==31827== by 0x7B876AD0: InitializeCriticalSection (sync.c:313)
==31827== by 0x6074935: ???
==31827== by 0x6011AC3: ???
==31827== by 0x5FE5C00: ???
==31827== by 0x600AAC0: ???
==31827== by 0x50A3E26: CoCreateInstance (unknwn.h:226)
==31827== by 0x5FA8D03: GetSplitter (mediadet.c:435)
==31827== by 0x5FA9282: MediaDet_put_Filename (mediadet.c:513)
==31827== by 0x4955998: test_mediadet (qedit.h:598)
==31827== by 0x4957974: func_mediadet (mediadet.c:474)
==31827== by 0x495877C: run_test (test.h:584)
==31827== by 0x4958B6A: main (test.h:654)
==31827==
==4134== 66 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 456 of 929
==4134== at 0x7BC4C735: notify_alloc (heap.c:255)
==4134== by 0x7BC50F79: RtlAllocateHeap (heap.c:1716)
==4134== by 0x52C2635: IMalloc_fnAlloc (ifs.c:186)
==4134== by 0x52C2F50: CoTaskMemAlloc (objidl.h:1236)
==4134== by 0x6345811: ???
==4134== by 0x634F193: ???
==4134== by 0x630023B: MediaDet_put_Filename (strmif.h:6469)
==4134== by 0x4A79998: test_mediadet (qedit.h:598)
==4134== by 0x4A7B974: func_mediadet (mediadet.c:474)
==4134== by 0x4A7C77C: run_test (test.h:584)
==4134== by 0x4A7CB6A: main (test.h:654)
==4134==
etc.
--
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36308
Bug ID: 36308
Summary: valgrind shows some possible leaks in
ole32/tests/compobj.c
Product: Wine
Version: 1.7.18
Hardware: x86
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Keywords: download, source, testcase
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: ole32
Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org
Reporter: austinenglish(a)gmail.com
==31284== 8 bytes in 1 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 56 of 665
==31284== at 0x7BC4C735: notify_alloc (heap.c:255)
==31284== by 0x7BC50F79: RtlAllocateHeap (heap.c:1716)
==31284== by 0x7B84586B: HeapAlloc (heap.c:271)
==31284== by 0x7B845B40: GlobalAlloc (heap.c:376)
==31284== by 0x509C3E7: OLEClipbrd_Initialize (clipboard.c:1732)
==31284== by 0x50D5772: OleInitialize (ole2.c:215)
==31284== by 0x497783C: test_CoInitializeEx (compobj.c:1924)
==31284== by 0x4977F18: func_compobj (compobj.c:2034)
==31284== by 0x49D0714: run_test (test.h:584)
==31284== by 0x49D0B03: main (test.h:654)
==31284==
==31284== 20 bytes in 1 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 152 of 665
==31284== at 0x7BC4C735: notify_alloc (heap.c:255)
==31284== by 0x7BC50F79: RtlAllocateHeap (heap.c:1716)
==31284== by 0x50AB48E: CoGetObjectContext (compobj.c:4872)
==31284== by 0x50AB679: CoGetContextToken (compobj.c:4925)
==31284== by 0x49770AE: test_CoGetContextToken (compobj.c:1840)
==31284== by 0x4977F0E: func_compobj (compobj.c:2032)
==31284== by 0x49D0714: run_test (test.h:584)
==31284== by 0x49D0B03: main (test.h:654)
==31284==
--
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36278
Bug ID: 36278
Summary: valgrind shows a leak in gameux/tests/gamexplorer.c
Product: Wine
Version: 1.7.18
Hardware: x86
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Keywords: download, source, testcase
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: gameux
Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org
Reporter: austinenglish(a)gmail.com
==27747== 28 bytes in 1 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 214 of 672
==27747== at 0x7BC4C735: notify_alloc (heap.c:255)
==27747== by 0x7BC50F79: RtlAllocateHeap (heap.c:1716)
==27747== by 0x57068CE: COMPOBJ_DllList_Add (compobj.c:526)
==27747== by 0x5708C0A: apartment_getclassobject (compobj.c:1335)
==27747== by 0x570C354: get_inproc_class_object (compobj.c:2894)
==27747== by 0x570C813: CoGetClassObject (compobj.c:3032)
==27747== by 0x570CDD5: CoCreateInstance (compobj.c:3197)
==27747== by 0x612F20F: GAMEUX_ParseGDFBinary (gameexplorer.c:437)
==27747== by 0x7BC87087: ??? (signal_i386.c:2571)
==27747== by 0x7BC870D0: call_thread_func (signal_i386.c:2630)
==27747== by 0x7BC87065: ??? (signal_i386.c:2571)
==27747== by 0x7BC8E4B0: start_thread (thread.c:428)
==27747== by 0x4EA7BD89: start_thread (in /usr/lib/libpthread-2.18.so)
==27747== by 0x4E95CA0D: clone (in /usr/lib/libc-2.18.so)
==27747==
--
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.