wine-bugs January 2016

wine-bugs@winehq.org

1 participants
9471 discussions

[Bug 5754] oleaut32: MS Dao 3.5 fails to evalutate "SELECT <CurrencyField> - <Currencyield> FROM ..." sql
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org 05 Jan '16

05 Jan '16

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5754 Nikolay Sivov <bunglehead(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed by SHA1| |9634ffa7dca3f42a7aeae9a9bb6 | |2c2bddf84e289 Component|ole |oleaut32 -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 7301] CoWaitForMultipleHandles missing from ole32.spec
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org 05 Jan '16

05 Jan '16

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7301 Nikolay Sivov <bunglehead(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed by SHA1| |00b29dfa790667ff88b06ef04d0 | |cf7b81bfc5822 Component|ole |ole32 -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 8812] Brno: Call to unimplemented function oleaut32.dll.VarWeekdayName
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org 05 Jan '16

05 Jan '16

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8812 Nikolay Sivov <bunglehead(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|ole |oleaut32 -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 10417] New: OLEAUT32: crash if >128 methods in an interface
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org 05 Jan '16

05 Jan '16

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10417 Summary: OLEAUT32: crash if >128 methods in an interface Product: Wine Version: 0.9.49. Platform: Macintosh OS/Version: Mac OS X 10.5 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P1 Component: wine-ole AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: mjk(a)cardbox.com This bug was encountered in build cxoffice-6.2.0rc1-2-g024be42 of Wine (part of CrossOver Mac). The bug has been identified in the current source code at http://source.winehq.org/source/dlls/oleaut32/tmarshal.c. Using any marshaled interface with more than 128 methods causes a crash within OLEAUT32 if any method at position >=128 is called. This was detected when using Cardbox (http://www.cardbox.com) and is a SHOW-STOPPER because it makes the use of VBScript macros impossible. However, the bug is completely general and applies to any application at all that has interfaces with large number of methods. It is quite possible that many random OLE / COM - related bugs that have already been reported have this bug as their underlying cause. The version of Cardbox on which the bug was found is more recent than the one currently available on the web site. If anyone wants to have a copy for testing, together with instructions for reproducing the crash, please contact me. LOCATION OF THE BUG The bug is in dlls/oleaut32/tmarshal.c. When constructing a proxy interface, PSFacBuf_CreateProxy at line #1712 constructs the following proxy code for each method: popl %eax pushl <nr> pushl %eax call xCall lret <n> (+4) where <nr> is the position of the method in the list of methods: 0, 1, 2, and so on. The pushl <nr> instruction is defined by following code: 374 BYTE pushlval; // set to 0x6a by line #1712 375 BYTE nr; The fact that the method position is a byte already limits the maximum size of an interface to 256 methods, which is less than the 512-method limit of Windows NT4.0 SP3, and the 1024-method limit of Windows 2000: see "MIDL2362" in http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa366756.aspx for details. Thus this needs to be corrected in any case. The proxy code as it stands will call method 0 instead of method 256, method 1 instead of method 257, and so on, leading to random behaviour and possible stack corruption. The crash when method 128 is called has a different cause. The proxy for method 128 contains the instruction 6A 80, because the programmer thought that this would push 00000080 onto the stack. In fact the PUSH instruction with opcode 6A SIGN-EXTENDS its operand and does not zero-extend it. Thus the proxy for the 128th method pushes FFFFFF80 onto the stack before calling xCall. xCall interprets this as a negative number (-128) and thus attempts to synthesize a call not to method 128 but to a non-existent method -128. In the same way it will call method -127 instead of method 129,... and so on. SUGGESTED CORRECTION The very simple correction to this bug, which is guaranteed to work, is to alter line 375 to 375 DWORD nr; and line 1712 to 1712 xasm->pushlval = 0x68; which expects a 32-bit operand rather than an 8-bit one. This will result in every proxy using 15 bytes per method instead of 12 bytes. This does not seem an excessive price to pay for complete reliability in the future: there will then be no limit to the number of methods that can be supported. ALTERNATIVE CORRECTIONS If the 25% expansion in proxy size is considered unacceptable (it should not really be: proxies are small) then there are several ways round the problem. An increase to 256 methods could be achieved simply by adding a line at the very beginning of xCall: method &= 0xff; but this would HAVE to be accompanied by an explicit test for the method count limit (now 256) in PSFacBuf_CreateProxy so that the attempt to create a proxy with too methods would simply fail rather than (as now) generate a proxy that will randomly crash the application. Another approach would be to create dummy functions (in assembler) that would add 128, 256, 384, 512, etc to the 'method' argument before forwarding it on to xCall. In that case, method numbers after 127 would generate proxies that called one of the variant xCalls instead of the original one. The programming in PSFacBuf_CreateProxy would be relatively straightforward, and the dummy functions would not need to do any stack manipulation: they would simply add an offset to the DWORD at [ESP+8] and then JMP straight to the start of xCall. This would *still* give a finite limit to the number of methods, but the limit would be much larger. Again, good engineering practice dictates that PSFacBuf_CreateProxy should report an error if it encounters a number of methods beyond the number that it was designed to cope with. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

1 11

[Bug 10536] New: ITypeInfo_fnInvoke failed to convert param 0 to VT_BOOL from VT_BSTR
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org 05 Jan '16

05 Jan '16

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10536 Summary: ITypeInfo_fnInvoke failed to convert param 0 to VT_BOOL from VT_BSTR Product: Wine Version: 0.9.49. Platform: PC URL: http://uniqlo.jp/uniqlock OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: wine-ole AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: fnjordy(a)gmail.com Uniqlock screensaver doesn't display anything, presumably it might be related to the Wine output: in CSoundUtils constructor: fixme:win:WIN_CreateWindowEx Parent is HWND_MESSAGE err:ole:ITypeInfo_fnInvoke failed to convert param 0 to VT_BOOL from VT_BSTR -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

1 4

[Bug 11775] New: Oleview does not correctly generate idl files
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org 05 Jan '16

05 Jan '16

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11775 Summary: Oleview does not correctly generate idl files Product: Wine Version: 0.9.56. Platform: Other OS/Version: other Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: ole AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: m.b.lankhorst(a)gmail.com When looking at the ipodservice typelib (install itunes v7.6, then look at the typelib in C:\Program Files\iPod Service\bin\iPodService.exe in wine oleview, it will generate wrong code. HRESULT foo([in]long pointer, [out, retval]VARIANT_BOOL *rar); is turned into: VARIANT_BOOL foo([in]long pointer); This happens for example with IItunesDevice_IsMounted. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

1 3

[Bug 16841] New: Max Payne 2: The Fall of Max Payne installation fails
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org 05 Jan '16

05 Jan '16

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16841 Summary: Max Payne 2: The Fall of Max Payne installation fails Product: Wine Version: 1.1.12 Platform: PC OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ole AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: drobyshewsky(a)gmail.com Created an attachment (id=18557) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=18557) Max Payne 2: The Fall of Max Payne installation fails Max Payne 2: The Fall of Max Payne installation fails -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

1 5

[Bug 16849] New: Regression: MSI error 1608
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org 05 Jan '16

05 Jan '16

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16849 Summary: Regression: MSI error 1608 Product: Wine Version: 1.1.12 Platform: PC OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ole AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: kennybobs(a)o2.co.uk Created an attachment (id=18583) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=18583) Screenshot 1608 EM In Wine 1.1.12 (and I believe 1.1.11), when attempting to install: Slingplayer http://appdb.winehq.org/objectManager.php?sClass=version&iId=11492 http://appdb.winehq.org/objectManager.php?sClass=version&iId=14812 eBay Turbo Lister http://appdb.winehq.org/objectManager.php?sClass=version&iId=15122 and apparently Mathematica 5.1 http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11771 and probably others (I didn't keep a list), MSI exits with error "1608: Unable to create InstallDriver Instance, Return Code: -2147467262". The installer works fine under Wine 1.0.0. Running git bisect, will update when done. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

1 15

[Bug 16851] New: Morrowind GOTY - DVD - Installers fail.
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org 05 Jan '16

05 Jan '16

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16851 Summary: Morrowind GOTY - DVD - Installers fail. Product: Wine Version: 1.1.12 Platform: Other OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: ole AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: kphillisjr(a)gmail.com The installers all fail when launching ikernel.exe, and this is on a default install of wine. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

1 5

[Bug 17920] New: OleUIAddVerbMenu is not realized
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org 05 Jan '16

05 Jan '16

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17920 Summary: OleUIAddVerbMenu is not realized Product: Wine Version: unspecified Platform: Other URL: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en- us/library/ms686597(VS.85).aspx OS/Version: other Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: ole AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: lav(a)etersoft.ru OleUIAddVerbMenu is not realized at all in current Wine. My last realization post at January, 16: http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2009-January/067827.html This realization tested with 1C Accounting program (specified for Russia) and has no reclamation. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

1 19

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

wine-bugs January 2016