wine-bugs December 2017

wine-bugs@winehq.org

1 participants
7834 discussions

[Bug 33660] New: CS:GO - Call votes respond
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org 04 May '21

04 May '21

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33660 Bug #: 33660 Summary: CS:GO - Call votes respond Product: Wine Version: 1.5.30 Platform: x86-64 OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: -unknown AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: pepe(a)bloodkings.eu Classification: Unclassified Once a player can call vote, and only works the first choice (F1, 1). -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

2 19

[Bug 31787] New: Run the tests in Wine
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org 03 May '21

03 May '21

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31787 Bug #: 31787 Summary: Run the tests in Wine Product: Wine-Testbot Version: unspecified Platform: x86 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: unknown AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: fgouget(a)codeweavers.com Classification: Unclassified The Wine TestBot runs the conformance tests on Windows VMs before they are committed to Wine. This greatly helped improve the quality of our conformance tests. The next step is making sure that the conformance tests work reliably in Wine too, and that Wine patches don't break them. The hope is that this will help us improve the state of the WineTest results: http://test.winehq.org/data/ Doing so will be much more processor intensive than the current process: * Currently only the conformance test patches are tested whereas we would need to test almost every single patch (we could ignore some documentation patches for instance). * Currently we only have to generate a binary for the one conformance test that's impacted. That's quick. Testing all Wine patches will require recompiling Wine every time which takes more time, even with ccache. * A Wine patch can have wide-ranging effects. For instance a patch to ntdll could impact pretty much any conformance test. That means rerunning all of them for every patch... unless we find reliable ways of pruning them (patches to conformance tests would be an obvious optimization). * Like for Windows we will need to test various configurations: different locales; 32, 64 and 32+64 bit Wine builds; different sound backends; possibly different Linux distributions; if possible FreeBSD and Solaris too (I'm leaving Mac OS X for another bug). In some cases the same binaries can be used for multiple tests (e.g. if only the locale changes) but in other cases not. * Also for the current Wine TestBot an unreliable test only impacts people modifying that test. But the above point means an unreliable test would impact most Wine patches, leading to lots of patches being rejected. So this means unreliable tests become a big issue and need to be handled in some way: fixed or blacklisted or still run but not considered cause for rejection (so one can notice when they get fixed). Then there is the question of whether this should be done by modifying the Wine TestBot or by using the BuildBot framework: http://trac.buildbot.net/wiki/AboutBuildbot Dan Kegel produced a proof of concept system based on BuildBot: http://wiki.winehq.org/BuildBot An issue is that without significant integration work, having both a WineTestBot and BuildBot system would be annoying: * The Wine TestBot currently has its own user database and BuildBot would add another one. So it would be one more login to manage for developers unless we manage to integrate either with another user database (e.g. through LDAP). * Developers would have to submit patches to both sites and check the results on both. * Integration with the Wine Patches site (http://source.winehq.org/patches/) would need to work with both systems. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

2 14

[Bug 33234] New: Improve user management
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org 03 May '21

03 May '21

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33234 Bug #: 33234 Summary: Improve user management Product: Wine-Testbot Version: unspecified Platform: x86 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: unknown AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: fgouget(a)codeweavers.com Classification: Unclassified When an account request is sent to a WineTestBot administrator the URL he gfets sent to is the UserDetails.pl one but it only has an 'Approve' button, not a 'Reject' one. This makes it unclear how to reject spam requests for instance (bug 31798), but this has now been documented. Still, rejecting an application actually requires going to another page and deleting the provisional account. This should be simpler: there should be a 'Reject' button right on the UserDetails page that does that. Furthermore, the status of the account, 'Pending approval' and 'Pending activation', should be clearly indicated both on the UserDetails page and on the UsersList page. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

2 5

[Bug 39442] New: Using Spice required to avoid failure in mmdevapi:capture
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org 03 May '21

03 May '21

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39442 Bug ID: 39442 Summary: Using Spice required to avoid failure in mmdevapi:capture Product: Wine-Testbot Version: unspecified Hardware: x86 OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: unknown Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: fgouget(a)codeweavers.com Distribution: --- The Windows 7+ VMs all use an ich6 virtual soundcard (they don't support any of ac97, es1370 or sb16 ones). But they have failures in mmdevapi:capture such as: capture.c:586: Returned latency: 5.8050 ms capture.c:178: Test failed: Position 375 expected 0 capture.c:186: Wait'ed position 375 pad 0 flags 1, amount of frames locked: 448 capture.c:228: Test failed: Position 1719 expected 823 [...] It turns out that the way the VM is configured for remote access impacts the result of the tests: * If configured for VNC then the tests fail as described, even if no client is connected. * If configured for Spice access then the tests succeed, even if no client is connected. And if a client is connected the sound is carried over with pretty good reliability. So the way one accesses the VM changes the behavior in the guest. That seems wrong and I reported it to QEmu: https://bugs.launchpad.net/qemu/+bug/1499908 I have updated the w7pro64 configuration on 2015/09/25 and it now only has one intermittent Master volume failure left in mmdevapi:capture. The change does not seem to have negatively impacted the other tests. So it seems the change can safely be propagated to the other Windows 7+ VMs. There may be one issue though, which is that combining QXL with Spice causes the Windows 10 VM to freeze very quickly. Hopefully that's specific to Windows 10. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

2 7

[Bug 39419] New: Fix the 'Failure running script in VM' errors
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org 03 May '21

03 May '21

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39419 Bug ID: 39419 Summary: Fix the 'Failure running script in VM' errors Product: Wine-Testbot Version: unspecified Hardware: x86 OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: unknown Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: fgouget(a)codeweavers.com Distribution: --- There are two very common 'boterror' types: Failure running script in VM: the "nc -q0 '10.42.42.133' '4242'" command returned 1 and Failure running script in VM: network read timed out (Connect:AgentVersion.h:0/9) Both seem to correspond to a network issue and both seem to almost exclusively and systematically happen with the w864 and w1064 VMs when running either a 32 or 64 bit WineTest job (i.e. running the full suite). -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

2 2

[Bug 40239] New: Submitting more than one job for a given file fails
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org 03 May '21

03 May '21

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40239 Bug ID: 40239 Summary: Submitting more than one job for a given file fails Product: Wine-Testbot Version: unspecified Hardware: x86 OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: unknown Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: fgouget(a)codeweavers.com Distribution: --- Steps to reproduce: * Open the 'Submit job' page in two windows. * In both select the same file, for instance a patch.diff file or mytest.exe one. * Fill the Remarks field and click on the next button in both windows. * Continue the submission process on both sides. * At the end one job will work and the other will have 'unknown' written in the 'File name' column and fail with a TestBot error. During the submission process the server faces the following conditions: * The server needs the uploaded file early in the submission process so it can analyze it and adjust the questions it asks later (e.g. prefill the command line for patches, only present 64 bit VMs for 64 bit executables, etc.). * There is no job yet to store the user-provided file. So it is stored in a temporary 'staging' area and then moved into place when the job is created. * The user can abandon the submission process at any time which causes the temporary files he uploaded to be orphaned. To deal with this issue the server has a garbage collecting mechanism. * To avoid interference between users if they upload files that have the same name the temporary filename is prefixed with a per-user string. * However nothing prevents a collision in the staging area starts two job submissions at the same time for the same file. This is what happens in the steps above. That last point is somewhat intentional as it limits the accumulation of orphaned files if a user abandons a submission only to pick it up a bit later. But getting a broken job is wrong in any case. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

2 2

[Bug 39417] New: Display duration instead of 'Ended' time
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org 03 May '21

03 May '21

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39417 Bug ID: 39417 Summary: Display duration instead of 'Ended' time Product: Wine-Testbot Version: unspecified Hardware: x86 OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: unknown Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: fgouget(a)codeweavers.com Distribution: --- For Jobs and Tasks the website shows the 'Ended' time but this is not very practical. Developers would likely be much more interested in the time it took to run the job/task. So all this does is force them to do that calculation themselves. The (slight) difficulty is mostly that the relevant pages use a base class that builds the HTML from all the selected fields. So the framework would need to be modified to let subclasses either provide their own 'virtual columns' with the corresponding header and content. Alternatively, in this case we could make do with letting them replace the column's header and content. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

2 2

[Bug 42770] New: test.winehq.org: Provide a view showing only the TestBot VMs
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org 03 May '21

03 May '21

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42770 Bug ID: 42770 Summary: test.winehq.org: Provide a view showing only the TestBot VMs Product: WineHQ.org Version: unspecified Hardware: x86 OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: www-unknown Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: fgouget(a)codeweavers.com Distribution: --- In Huw's words: > Something else that would be very useful is the ability to > display just the test bot VMs. These are the ones we care > about the most, and the ones that are possible to fix without > having to get a third-party to manually run a test. I find it > difficult to just keep track of these VMs when their results get > swamped by all the other machines’ failures. > > I‘d imagine this should be possible to do using static > pages. The root page (equivalent to data/index.html) > could be something like data/wtb_index.html. Clicking > on a build id would take you to data/build-id/wtb_index.html, > then clicking on an OS flavour would take you to > data/build-id/wtb_index_flavour.html. You’d also need some > way to toggle in and out of the mode. This should be pretty similar to adding the 'flat index' files mentioned in bug 39379. https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39379 An interesting alternative would be to go the JavaScript way and make the index files, which are essentially big tables, sortable, filterable on the client-side. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

2 3

[Bug 32216] New: WienTestBot should skip some tests on some platforms
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org 03 May '21

03 May '21

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32216 Bug #: 32216 Summary: WienTestBot should skip some tests on some platforms Product: Wine-Testbot Version: unspecified Platform: x86 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: unknown AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: fgouget(a)codeweavers.com Classification: Unclassified An example is the ieframe:webbrowser tests which it should skip on NT4 and Windows 2000 platforms. WineTest.exe is said to already have the necessary code somewhere, it's just missing from TestLauncher. See this wine-devel thread for more details: http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/2012-November/097819.html -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

2 11

[Bug 27453] New: Lag when loading new sound in source games
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org 03 May '21

03 May '21

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27453 Summary: Lag when loading new sound in source games Product: Wine Version: 1.3.21 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: -unknown AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: congelli501(a)gmail.com When you start a level in a game powered by valve's source engine, sounds that are played for the first time since the game was launched will cause the game to lag. Ex: open a new portal for the first time in a Portal2 level. Affects: - Portal 2 - Left 4 Dead 2 - Probably more... -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

2 39

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

wine-bugs December 2017