https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50856
Bug ID: 50856
Summary: FoxITReader not properly works with digital sign and
timestamp
Product: Wine
Version: 6.0
Hardware: x86-64
OS: Linux
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: -unknown
Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org
Reporter: matthus(a)nexgo.de
Distribution: ---
Created attachment 69672
--> https://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=69672
Messages
Hallo,
in version 6.0 many of old problems solved by using FoxITReader - thank you! I
can evaluate digital signs and add picture-signs. I can add certificates from
servers and my own .p12-certificate.
But I can't add new digital sign and also a timestamp-certifikat. By adding a
digital sign it's appear by saving. By Time stamp document I got "network
anomaly".
Must use in a windows 10 environment
crypt32 nativ
comctl32 Builtin
Many other dlls I loaded but not shure what is needed.
What can I do to use digital signs?
with regards
--
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22649
Summary: CDBurnerXP 4.3.x crashes when trying to erase a DVD-RW
Product: Wine
Version: 1.1.44
Platform: x86-64
URL: http://cdburnerxp.se/download?more-options
OS/Version: Linux
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: -unknown
AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org
ReportedBy: RandomAccountName(a)mail.com
Created an attachment (id=27861)
--> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=27861)
Crash log
After choosing "erase disc" in the main menu and then clicking the erase button
(while a DVD-RW disc is inserted in a drive the program can detect), the
program produces an error dialog:
Erasing the disc failed for the following reason: Exception from HRESULT:
0x8001010E (RPC_E_WRONG_THREAD)
Clicking OK to this message results in the MS error report tool popping up,
followed by the Wine crash dialog.
Note: this program needs dotnet20, and it needs the workaround from bug 18012,
comment 2 to be able to detect drives in this section.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29780
Bug #: 29780
Summary: XPS Viewer EP shows garbage in the toolbar background
Product: Wine
Version: 1.4-rc2
Platform: x86-64
URL: http://download.microsoft.com/download/2/5/2/2526f55d-
32bc-410f-be18-164ba67ae07d/XPSEP XP and Server 2003
32 bit.msi
OS/Version: Linux
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: trivial
Priority: P2
Component: comctl32
AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org
ReportedBy: RandomAccountName(a)mail.com
CC: bunglehead(a)gmail.com
Classification: Unclassified
Regression SHA1: 1c1b1c0073c3dea34ff4096d749a459accf5e337
Created attachment 38676
--> http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=38676
Terminal output
The background of the toolbar in XPS Viewer EP is not displayed properly,
showing garbage (previous screen content). This worked in 1.4-rc1, and
regression testing indicated:
1c1b1c0073c3dea34ff4096d749a459accf5e337 is the first bad commit
commit 1c1b1c0073c3dea34ff4096d749a459accf5e337
Author: Nikolay Sivov <nsivov(a)codeweavers.com>
Date: Wed Feb 1 00:07:00 2012 +0300
comctl32: More tests for Toolbar window style handling.
:040000 040000 dd921cd22cea799bb21627f6e80aba024d087098
ee93a6dccb2bc9c894dc6330dbae8fc4650b2b82 M dlls
Reverting the patch fixed it.
To reproduce:
1. In system32, make a copy of acledit.dll named xpssvcs.dll
2. Install (occasionally crashes - retry if needed)
3. wine xpsrchvw
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25410
Summary: MS Paint doesn't refresh scrollbars properly
Product: Wine
Version: 1.3.8
Platform: x86-64
URL: http://download.microsoft.com/download/winntwks40/pain
t/1/nt4/en-us/paintnt.exe
OS/Version: Linux
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: trivial
Priority: P2
Component: -unknown
AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org
ReportedBy: RandomAccountName(a)mail.com
In MS Paint (installed with winetricks) the scrollbars don't seem to refresh
when they should unless the scrollbar area is clicked on.
Simple way to reproduce: Ensure that the canvas is smaller than the window (so
no scrollbars are visible) then zoom in on a portion of the picture (ensure
it's not the entire picture). Scrollbars should appear, but instead, they're
invisible. After clicking in the area where they should be, they become
visible.
Terminal output: nothing.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45221
Bug ID: 45221
Summary: AppDB: "Your Version" column in maintained apps doesnt
show word "staging"
Product: WineHQ Apps Database
Version: unspecified
Hardware: Other
OS: Linux
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: appdb-unknown
Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org
Reporter: havran.jan(a)email.cz
Distribution: ---
"Your Version" column in "Maintainership Overview" menu doesnt show word
"staging", while "Current Version" column does (for staging releases even if
"your" test result is the latest (current) one). It happens for example for
these versions maintained by me: Vietcong (MP Demo FistAlpha) [1], Air
Missions: HIND (Steam) [2].
It is confusing, because it looks like I posted test result with "testing"
version and after that someone else posted test with the same version, but
"staging" in this case, which is not true.
[1] https://appdb.winehq.org/objectManager.php?sClass=version&iId=36433
[2] https://appdb.winehq.org/objectManager.php?sClass=version&iId=35881
--
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49744
Bug ID: 49744
Summary: fbclid should be a numeric value
Product: WineHQ Apps Database
Version: unspecified
Hardware: x86
OS: Linux
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: appdb-unknown
Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org
Reporter: huupoke12(a)gmail.com
Distribution: ---
URLs to AppDB posted on Facebook will generate an fbclid parameter in the URL.
But that parameter is currently a long alphanumeric string, not a numeric only
string, so the bug will happen.
But why does the AppDB processing this parameter? Can it just ignore the
parameter?
--
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22798
Summary: Invalid Wine version results in hidden / lost /
invisible test results entry
Product: WineHQ Apps Database
Version: unspecified
Platform: x86
OS/Version: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: appdb-unknown
AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org
ReportedBy: sparr0(a)gmail.com
I submitted test results for Time of Defiance
(http://appdb.winehq.org/objectManager.php?sClass=version&iId=8261) with an
invalid Wine Version number (1.1.45). The form accepted my submission, and I
was later emailed that my results had been added (perhaps because I was the
submitter, perhaps because I am the maintainer of the version). Now
http://appdb.winehq.org/objectManager.php?sClass=version&iId=8261&iTestingI…
displays my new results in the "Selected Test Results" box, but on no page are
the details of the results visible in the "Test Results" box.
I expect two fixes are required here. First, more input validation on the
submission page. Second, whatever is preventing this entry from showing up
under Test Results.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23124
Summary: Philippine English locale defaults to wrong SUBLANG
Product: Wine
Version: unspecified
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Keywords: download, source
Severity: trivial
Priority: P4
Component: -unknown
AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org
ReportedBy: kennybobs(a)o2.co.uk
I understand that following 1.2 .po file are going to be used, so this should
be easier to resolve then.
Philippine English follows American English rules, but currently defaults to
pick up SUBLANG_NEUTRAL which is British English. It should be picking up
SUBLANG_DEFAULT for American English.
I'm not sure if this can be changed before the introduction of .po files but
it's not urgent.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philippine_English
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46439
Bug ID: 46439
Summary: error when installs mBlock 5 for PC
Product: Wine-staging
Version: 3.6
Hardware: x86-64
OS: Linux
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: -unknown
Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org
Reporter: paulo_fg(a)hotmail.com
CC: leslie_alistair(a)hotmail.com, z.figura12(a)gmail.com
Distribution: ---
software link: http://www.mblock.cc/mblock-software/
error:
012d:err:ole:CoGetClassObject class {56fdf344-fd6d-11d0-958a-006097c9a090} not
registered
012d:err:ole:CoGetClassObject no class object
{56fdf344-fd6d-11d0-958a-006097c9a090} could be created for context 0x1
winecfg: Windows 10
Tested on Linux Mint Tessa
--
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25543
Summary: Submitter's test results missing from 'Test Results'
table
Product: WineHQ Apps Database
Version: unspecified
Platform: x86
OS/Version: Linux
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: appdb-unknown
AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org
ReportedBy: hoehle(a)users.sourceforge.net
The link in the mail that the maintainer receives, e.g.
"Test Results submitted for version 1.0 of X by Y"
http://appdb.winehq.org/objectManager.php?sClass=version&iId=4219&iTestingI…
leads to a page that shows the submitter's text with the title
"Selected Test Results (selected in 'Test Results' table below)"
However, the OS/version/rating 'test results' line corresponding to the
submission is missing. Instead the topmost line displays an old (known) entry.
This is really confusing and irritating.
Furthermore, the page displayed does not show a "process" or "reply" buttons. I
need to go to my queue and identify this entry among all the elements of the
queue in order to process it.
I believe both things worked well in the past -- 2-3 years ago?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42630
Bug ID: 42630
Summary: Submitted application test shows no test data when
previewed
Product: WineHQ Apps Database
Version: unspecified
Hardware: x86
OS: Linux
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: appdb-unknown
Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org
Reporter: fjfrackiewicz(a)gmail.com
Distribution: ---
Hi,
As per Roseanne's request in this bug report
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34647#c23 I am filing a new bug that I
have come across in the AppDB.
I have submitted this test for GOG Galaxy
https://appdb.winehq.org/objectManager.php?bIsQueue=false&bIsRejected=false…
and when I go to preview it, there is no test data shown whatsoever.
I made the report while using Firefox 52.0 in case it helps.
--
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48468
Bug ID: 48468
Summary: Add "Bronze" and "Garbage" top-10 lists to the appdb
landing page
Product: WineHQ.org
Version: unspecified
Hardware: x86-64
OS: Linux
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P2
Component: www-unknown
Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org
Reporter: jonwsb(a)gmail.com
Distribution: ---
The top-10 lists on appdb.winehq.org are a very nice feature of the site. Their
purpose of showing off what popular programs work in wine is very useful to new
users and I think adding the "Bronze" and "Garbage" ratings to the page will
also provide valuable information to new users as well as contributors. For new
users it will give quick access to information on programs they may be planning
on attempting to use with wine. For advanced users and contributors it will be
a useful tool to gauge which programs need high quality testing and possibly
give inspiration for developing patches to improve bronze and garbage rating
entries.
My biggest concern with adding these top-10 lists would be increasing the size
of the page even more than it already is though it will also probably drive
users of the appdb to vote for more applications overall.
--
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42333
Bug ID: 42333
Summary: "Top garbage" list on AppDB
Product: WineHQ Apps Database
Version: unspecified
Hardware: Other
OS: other
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P2
Component: appdb-unknown
Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org
Reporter: roothorick(a)gmail.com
Just a simple top 10 or top 25 list of the most active apps with a garbage
rating. It would be an easy at-a-glance forecast of what apps (and therefore,
indirectly, what bugs) are the greatest concern for Wine users.
--
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44333
Bug ID: 44333
Summary: Alphabetical order for monitored Applications
Product: WineHQ Apps Database
Version: unspecified
Hardware: x86-64
OS: Linux
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P2
Component: appdb-unknown
Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org
Reporter: mywine(a)schiermeier-it.de
Distribution: ---
Created attachment 60207
--> https://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=60207
Actual view of AppDBs side bar at the end of this bar
Two points about the side bar in AppDB:
1.) Would like to have either a possibility to choose the order or this list
should be in alphabetical order
2.) The "Maintainer box" should be before the list of monitored applications.
--
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46461
Bug ID: 46461
Summary: Game Version is on the wrong game page
Product: WineHQ Apps Database
Version: unspecified
Hardware: x86-64
OS: Linux
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: appdb-unknown
Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org
Reporter: gero45(a)mr-gero.de
Distribution: ---
I think that Version "3.1415926" on the Page for Civilization IV:Colonization
(https://appdb.winehq.org/objectManager.php?sClass=version&iId=953) doesn't
belong to this Game.
Instead it probably belongs to the original "Sid Meier's Colonization"
(https://www.mobygames.com/game/windows/sid-meiers-colonization) instead.
Reasons:
-there is no such Version for Civilization IV:Colonization
-the last test mentions a patch for Win95 and a Win16 installer version, this
would fit with the Game from 1995.
--
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48607
Bug ID: 48607
Summary: Incorrect developer name for YGOPro
Product: WineHQ Apps Database
Version: unspecified
Hardware: x86
OS: Linux
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: appdb-unknown
Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org
Reporter: cumandr+wine(a)gmail.com
Distribution: ---
https://appdb.winehq.org/objectManager.php?sClass=application&iId=14884
YGOPro is not developed by "Kaiba Corporation". Numerous forks exist, some
violating the GPL, but the original codebase is located at
https://github.com/Fluorohydride/ygopro and not led by any organization.
--
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49008
Bug ID: 49008
Summary: Invalid To: tag in registration confirmation email
Product: WineHQ.org
Version: unspecified
Hardware: x86
OS: Linux
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: www-unknown
Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org
Reporter: lxahotqu2zbx(a)mail.ru
Distribution: ---
Created attachment 66984
--> https://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=66984
The email file
Hello,
The site sends an email to confirm registration. The To: tag must contain the
address of the user to whom the e-mail is addressed following the e-mail
standards. Letters from you are placed in the spam folder because the tag
currently has the value appdb-noreply(a)winehq.org. I ask you fix the problem.
I attached the email file to this report.
Kind Regards,
Ilia
--
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49677
Bug ID: 49677
Summary: Registering app fails with database error
Product: WineHQ Apps Database
Version: unspecified
Hardware: x86
OS: Linux
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: appdb-unknown
Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org
Reporter: cbase2015-winebug(a)yahoo.de
Distribution: ---
Created attachment 67917
--> https://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=67917
Error message when trying to submit new app "α-Orionis Centurion"
Trying to submit a new app with the name "α-Orionis Centurion" fails (see
screenshot).
--
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18790
Summary: Default search does not include resolved bugs
Product: WineHQ Bugzilla
Version: unspecified
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Keywords: download, source
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component: bugzilla-unknown
AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org
ReportedBy: kennybobs(a)o2.co.uk
The default search (the search box at the top of this page) does not include
closed bugs (rightly so), but it also does not include resolved bugs. This
leads to duplicates that could be avoided.
See Bug 18601 - a recent regression that is fixed by the next release, but
anyone searching for an open bug for Google Sketchup will not see it unless
they choose to run an advanced search, which some users clearly don't.
I'm sure this is a simple change to the code.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24566
Summary: bugzilla adds mr.bugs to cc list?
Product: WineHQ Bugzilla
Version: unspecified
Platform: x86
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: bugzilla-unknown
AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org
ReportedBy: dank(a)kegel.com
Bugs start out with Mr. Bugs as the default assignee, which is evidently
intended so the mailing list gets copied on all bug changes. That's fine.
But under some situations, bugzilla seems to also automatically add
mr. bugs to the cc list.
For instance, here:
http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-bugs/2010-September/251648.html
Whereupon Dmitry promptly removed it from the cc:
http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-bugs/2010-September/251690.html
Austin verified that this had been done automatically by repeating his
component change:
http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-bugs/2010-September/251728.html
and then removed the extra cc manually in the next change.
What's going on here? Should that cc be added automatically or not?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39009
Bug ID: 39009
Summary: "Importance" link on bug report form opens in wrong
place on fields descriptions page
Product: WineHQ Bugzilla
Version: unspecified
Hardware: x86
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: bugzilla-unknown
Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org
Reporter: dimesio(a)earthlink.net
Distribution: ---
The fields description page has two sections for Importance. The first one is
right below the status definitions table; right below it are the definitions
for Priority and Severity (which is what users need to see). The second
Importance section is toward the bottom of the page, and it just describes the
field as "the combination of its Priority and Severity" without the severity
definitions anywhere in sight.
Clicking the Importance link on the bug report form opens the page at the
second Importance section when it should open at the first one (or even better,
at the Severity section, since that's what we really want users to see). The
result is that users don't see the actual definitions for severity even if they
do bother to click the link.
--
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12091
Summary: out of place text on bugzilla component description page
Product: WineHQ Bugzilla
Version: unspecified
Platform: Other
OS/Version: other
Status: NEW
Severity: trivial
Priority: P2
Component: bugzilla-unknown
AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org
ReportedBy: thestig(a)google.com
I can't seem to find the change for this in bugzilla.git...
On http://bugs.winehq.org/enter_bug.cgi, someone added the text:
<-- You probably want to use that link there!
Wine bugs. Submit bugs related to Wine here.
<-- Use this if in doubt!
but it also appears on this page:
http://bugs.winehq.org/describecomponents.cgi?product=Wine
which doesn't make any sense.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41825
Bug ID: 41825
Summary: Typo in "Comments Disabled"
Product: WineHQ.org
Version: unspecified
Hardware: x86
OS: Linux
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: www-unknown
Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org
Reporter: plata(a)mailbox.org
Distribution: ---
"Comments for this application have be disabled becuase there are no
maintainers."
--
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46624
Bug ID: 46624
Summary: StarCraft: Remastered Edition disabled Monitors, Gamma
Correction and Real-Time Lightning configuration
Product: Wine-staging
Version: 4.0
Hardware: x86
OS: Linux
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: -unknown
Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org
Reporter: linards.liepins(a)gmail.com
CC: leslie_alistair(a)hotmail.com, z.figura12(a)gmail.com
Distribution: ---
Created attachment 63525
--> https://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=63525
screenshot
Attaching Screenshot.
Logs not provided as I am using Battle.net Launcher.
Distro: Fedora 29 x64
System details /
Graphics:
Device-1: AMD Ellesmere [Radeon RX 470/480/570/570X/580/580X/590]
vendor: XFX Pine driver: amdgpu v: kernel bus ID: 01:00.0
chip ID: 1002:67df
Display: x11 server: Fedora Project X.org 1.20.3 driver: amdgpu
compositor: gnome-shell v: 3.30.2 resolution: 1920x1080~60Hz
OpenGL: renderer: Radeon RX 580 Series (POLARIS10 DRM 3.27.0
4.20.6-200.fc29.x86_64 LLVM 7.0.1)
v: 4.5 Mesa 18.3.3 direct render: Yes
NOTE: Mesa upgraded from Mesa 18.2.8 to 18.3.3 via
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/petrb/mesa/
--
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.