https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40104
Bug ID: 40104
Summary: ReplayGain by Foobar
Product: Wine
Version: unspecified
Hardware: x86-64
OS: Linux
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Priority: P2
Component: -unknown
Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org
Reporter: adl-88(a)posteo.de
Distribution: ---
ReplayGain by Foobar gains only with standardoptions and it ignores every
change.
So if I want to write with "+0.0db" to get "89db" on a track he will do this.
But if I want to write with "+6,00" to get "95db" on a track he also writes
with "0,0db". It seems that its a debian versions problem. Ubuntu versions
works fine. But I dont use ubuntu anymore.
--
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52760
Bug ID: 52760
Summary: asking cd while cdrom was mounted
Product: Wine
Version: 7.3
Hardware: x86-64
OS: Linux
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: -unknown
Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org
Reporter: elias_0000_0000(a)yahoo.com
Distribution: ---
>From internet archive, i downloaded puzz3d games. (3d puzzles).
I run
mkdir /home/user/cdrom
fuseiso /puzz3d.bin /home/user/cdrom/
then winecfg to set e: or d: as cdrom drive with the above path
"/home/user/cdrom/"
then, i run wine setup.exe from the cdrom path.
The game is asking for cdrom path.
I dont know if this is a fault or of the game or of wine.
What i must do?
kubuntu with bullseye 11 kernel.
--
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52702
Bug ID: 52702
Summary: Old DLLs left in system32 and syswow
Product: Wine
Version: 7.2
Hardware: x86-64
OS: Linux
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: -unknown
Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org
Reporter: mikes(a)kuentos.guam.net
Distribution: ---
Noticed a difference with running wine under my regular user versus a new setup
with root user for testing?
Found my user had a number of dll files in directories were older recent
install under the root user??
Moved old dll to dll.org and then copied the newer one from root?
Fixed my problem, but not sure why the dlls hadn't been updated like most
others? Some just a few months, but one was from 1998?
623771 Feb 22, 2022 ./system32/concrt140.dll
309136 Dec 3, 2021 ./system32/concrt140.dll.org
124624 Feb 22, 2022 ./system32/msvcp140_1.dll
23928 Dec 3, 2021 ./system32/msvcp140_1.dll.org
114163 Feb 22, 2022 ./system32/msvcp140_atomic_wait.dll
41360 Dec 3, 2021 ./system32/msvcp140_atomic_wait.dll.org
4228026 Feb 22, 2022 ./system32/msvcp140.dll
564088 Dec 3, 2021 ./system32/msvcp140.dll.org
217458 Feb 22, 2022 ./system32/vcruntime140_1.dll
36728 Dec 3, 2021 ./system32/vcruntime140_1.dll.org
111872 Feb 22, 2022 ./system32/vcruntime140.dll
96144 Dec 3, 2021 ./system32/vcruntime140.dll.org
721621 Feb 22, 2022 ./syswow64/atl.dll
73785 Feb 11, 2000 ./syswow64/atl.dll.org
82113 Feb 22, 2022 ./syswow64/comcat.dll
22288 Feb 11, 2000 ./syswow64/comcat.dll.org
498588 Feb 22, 2022 ./syswow64/concrt140.dll
243600 Dec 3, 2021 ./syswow64/concrt140.dll.org
586315 Feb 22, 2022 ./syswow64/msvcirt.dll
77878 Jun 16, 1998 ./syswow64/msvcirt.dll.org
95914 Feb 22, 2022 ./syswow64/msvcp140_1.dll
21368 Dec 3, 2021 ./syswow64/msvcp140_1.dll.org
101627 Feb 22, 2022 ./syswow64/msvcp140_atomic_wait.dll
39288 Dec 3, 2021 ./syswow64/msvcp140_atomic_wait.dll.org
3310918 Feb 22, 2022 ./syswow64/msvcp140.dll
436600 Dec 3, 2021 ./syswow64/msvcp140.dll.org
2807249 Feb 22, 2022 ./syswow64/msvcp60.dll
401462 Jun 16, 1998 ./syswow64/msvcp60.dll.org
4404513 Feb 22, 2022 ./syswow64/oleaut32.dll
598288 Feb 11, 2000 ./syswow64/oleaut32.dll.org
121449 Feb 22, 2022 ./syswow64/olepro32.dll
164112 Feb 11, 2000 ./syswow64/olepro32.dll.org
95194 Feb 22, 2022 ./syswow64/vcruntime140.dll
76152 Dec 3, 2021 ./syswow64/vcruntime140.dll.org
--
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48028
Bug ID: 48028
Summary: Error trying to install instanlling Adobe ADE 4.5
Product: Wine
Version: unspecified
Hardware: x86
OS: Linux
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: -unknown
Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org
Reporter: carlosm1979(a)gmail.com
Distribution: ---
Error trying to install instanlling Adobe ADE 4.5
--
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47953
Bug ID: 47953
Summary: Adobe Reader is DC fails to load files
Product: Wine
Version: unspecified
Hardware: x86
OS: Linux
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Priority: P2
Component: -unknown
Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org
Reporter: varia.3(a)osu.edu
Distribution: ---
This issues happens in multiple versions of Wine. Starting with Adobe Reader DC
version 19.012.20034 and onward I am unable to open a PDF file in Adobe reader
on wine.
If you go one version before to Reader DC version 19.010.20100 then Adobe
reader installs and opens PDFs just fine. Something changed in 19.012.x onward
that has broken this.
--
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52647
Bug ID: 52647
Summary: wine-staging 7.3 fails to run on debian11 (but work on
Debian10)
Product: Wine-staging
Version: unspecified
Hardware: x86-64
OS: Linux
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: -unknown
Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org
Reporter: alois.schloegl(a)gmail.com
CC: leslie_alistair(a)hotmail.com, z.figura12(a)gmail.com
Distribution: ---
I'm try to run some CUDA application (Cuda-Z, Warpem) on Debian11.
Both appliations are running find under wine-staging 7.3 on some Debian10
machines. When trying to install wine-staging on some Debian11 machines (either
upgraded from Debian10, or installed Debian11 from scratch) and following the
these instructions [1] of installing wine, wine fails to run, and switches into
debug mode.
Here is the short log, when the WINEPREFIX did alreay exist.
002c:fixme:winediag:LdrInitializeThunk wine-staging 7.3 is a testing version
containing experimental patches.
002c:fixme:winediag:LdrInitializeThunk Please mention your exact version when
filing bug reports on winehq.org.
wine: Unhandled page fault on execute access to 00007FB4D8B485C0 at address
00007FB4D8B485C0 (thread 0068), starting debugger...
wine: Unhandled page fault on execute access to 00007FDE04B370D0 at address
00007FDE04B370D0 (thread 00c8), starting debugger...
wine: Unhandled page fault on execute access to 00007FAD3A6C05C0 at address
00007FAD3A6C05C0 (thread 00dc), starting debugger...
wine: Unhandled page fault on execute access to 00007F12CA1970D0 at address
00007F12CA1970D0 (thread 00f0), starting debugger...
I remember that a few weeks ago, I could make wine-staging (v7.1?) running on
Debian11. But I can not reproduce this anymore.
I'm suspecting that some dependencies on libraries have changed, or some
dependencies are not correct in the debian/control file.
Or that some some differences in the build environment and my setup is in place
I tried checking finding differences in the packages installed, and fixed a
number of difference, but there are too many. And I've not been successful so
far.
Do you have any ideas how to proceed and identify what the problem might be ?
[1] https://wiki.winehq.org/Debian
--
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9901
Summary: GetMonitorInfo returns wrong work area
Product: Wine
Version: CVS/GIT
Platform: Other
OS/Version: other
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: wine-x11driver
AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org
ReportedBy: lich(a)math.spbu.ru
GetMontorInfo always returns rcWork equal to rcMonitor, but it must take panels
and taskbars into account.
The only solution I can see is to use SystemParametersInfo(SPI_SETWORKAREA)
during initialization time, but I do not know how to deal with different
monitors.
P.S. It is needed to properly implement maximum dimensions of console window.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=51882
Bug ID: 51882
Summary: Application using third party DLL can't use COM object
(class not registered)
Product: Wine
Version: 6.18
Hardware: x86-64
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: -unknown
Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org
Reporter: dark.shadow4(a)web.de
Distribution: ---
Reported in the forums: https://forum.winehq.org/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=32385
--
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39627
Bug ID: 39627
Summary: BreezeBrowser Pro 1.x crashes on start
Product: Wine
Version: 1.7.34
Hardware: x86
URL: http://www.breezesys.com/downloads/bbpro1987.exe
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Keywords: download, regression
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: ntdll
Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org
Reporter: gyebro69(a)gmail.com
CC: erich.e.hoover(a)wine-staging.com
Regression SHA1: ca51e113e4820f8b11016c13732b1a971d2b0054
Distribution: ---
The application crashes immediately after starting (no backtrace is generated
for me):
fixme:heap:RtlSetHeapInformation (nil) 1 (nil) 0 stub
fixme:ntdll:server_ioctl_file Unsupported ioctl 900a8 (device=9 access=0
func=2a method=0)
fixme:ntdll:server_ioctl_file Unsupported ioctl 900a8 (device=9 access=0
func=2a method=0)
wine: Unhandled exception 0x40000015 in thread 9 at address 0x80d930 (thread
0009), starting debugger...
If you manually create an empty 'dbglogs' directory under ~/Documents, then the
application starts properly.It seems the application fails to create that
directory for some reason.
Regression introduced by
commit ca51e113e4820f8b11016c13732b1a971d2b0054
Author: Erich E. Hoover <erich.e.hoover(a)gmail.com>
Date: Tue Aug 19 20:31:00 2014 -0600
ntdll: Unify retrieving the attributes of a file.
The commit can't be reverted on git (Wine build failure), however the
application starts properly with the previous commit (and dbglogs directory is
created).
Still present in wine-1.7.55-73-g39f2ed3.
bbpro1987.exe
sha1: ead99cf82bc8eeac4413ed4939891bbe57251058
--
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47618
Bug ID: 47618
Summary: Required gstreamer plugins not installed by Debian
packages
Product: Packaging
Version: unspecified
Hardware: x86
OS: Linux
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: wine-packages
Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org
Reporter: jre.winesim(a)gmail.com
CC: dimesio(a)earthlink.net, michael(a)fds-team.de,
sebastian(a)fds-team.de
Distribution: ---
Hi,
from https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wine/+bug/1817244 and followup
reading at winehq I learned that several gstreamer plugins are required for
some media, but the Debian packages don't install them.
In this specific case I couldn't reproduce the issue as long as
libmpg123-0:i386 was installed. But I assume current Wine still generally
needs them!? Please comment.
Unless you have some other input, I'm going to fix this in the debian.org
packages, and suggest you do something similar in the winehq -i386 and -amd64
packages:
Recommends:
gstreamer1.0-libav,
gstreamer1.0-plugins-good,
gstreamer1.0-plugins-ugly,
This works on Debian unstable.
gstreamer1.0-plugins-bad still has non multi-arch'd dependencies. I'll try to
get those fixed.
I assume some other distros don't support multi-arch for the previous 3
packages, so you might have to add this conditionally.
Also some distros might still use gstreamer 0.10.
Greets!
jre
--
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.