wine-bugs September 2022

wine-bugs@winehq.org

1 participants
3313 discussions

[Bug 40119] New: Irfanview 4.x: selection cursor is not correctly aligned
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org 24 Jun '23

24 Jun '23

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40119 Bug ID: 40119 Summary: Irfanview 4.x: selection cursor is not correctly aligned Product: Wine Version: 1.8 Hardware: x86-64 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: -unknown Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: Ulf.Zibis(a)gmx.de Distribution: --- - select an area in an image - correct the selection by dragging the left selection border to another position --> the double-ended arrow cursor ofen is not correctly aligned with the selection border I guess this happens, when the image is zoomed. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

2 9

[Bug 53682] New: wineboot shows "user_check_not_lock BUG: holding USER lock" on aarch64 since wine-7.14
by WineHQ Bugzilla 23 Jun '23

23 Jun '23

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53682 Bug ID: 53682 Summary: wineboot shows "user_check_not_lock BUG: holding USER lock" on aarch64 since wine-7.14 Product: Wine Version: 7.14 Hardware: aarch64 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ntdll Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: PuetzKevinA(a)JohnDeere.com Distribution: --- I recently updated our builds to past wine-7.0, and began encountering a wineboot failure on aarch64 > 0040:err:system:user_check_not_lock BUG: holding USER lock(64) > s\system32\rundll32.exe: /home/yukondev/workspace/wine/dlls/win32u/sysparams.c:400: user_check_not_lock: Assertion `0' failed. > 0040:err:seh:call_function_handlers invalid frame 21f410 (0000000000022000-0000000000120000) > 0040:err:seh:NtRaiseException Exception frame is not in stack limits => unable to dispatch exception. After some bisecting, I narrowed this down to being a regression between 7.13 and 7.14, and then further narrowed it to https://source.winehq.org/git/wine.git/commit/d50112b4b6e82782d3924a8dbd443… Somehow the call to KeUserModeCallback( NtUserLoadSysMenu,... ) at https://gitlab.winehq.org/wine/wine/-/blob/d50112b4b6e82782d3924a8dbd443f82… does not properly return. I think that commit is mostly a false lead though, the translation of syscall NtUserCreateWindowEx to a syscall just exposed a latent bug in KeUserModeCallback/__wine_syscall_dispatcher on aarch64, since having NtUserCreateWindowEx be a syscall means KeUserModeCallback can no longer use its "if we have no syscall frame, call the callback directly" simple path https://gitlab.winehq.org/wine/wine/-/blob/master/dlls/ntdll/unix/signal_ar… What seems to be actually at fault is that, inside of User32LoadSysMenu (the actual function invoked by KeUserModeCallback), is a call to NtUserCreateMenu - which is *also* a syscall. This call doesn't crash, and in fact all of User32LoadSysMenu runs to completion. But when it goes through __wine_syscall_dispatcher, the stack pointer is restored to be `$sp = arm64_thread_data()->syscall_frame` https://gitlab.winehq.org/wine/wine/-/blob/master/dlls/ntdll/unix/signal_ar… - i.e. it points to &callback_frame, back on the stack of KeUserModeCallback. And this is *not* the bottom of the stack; there's compiler-generated prologue/epilogue to restore various non-volatile registers. 0x0000ffffaa0247b4 <KeUserModeCallback+0>: sub sp, sp, #0x450 0x0000ffffaa0247b8 <KeUserModeCallback+4>: stp x29, x30, [sp] 0x0000ffffaa0247bc <KeUserModeCallback+8>: mov x29, sp 0x0000ffffaa0247c0 <KeUserModeCallback+12>: stp x19, x20, [sp, #16] 0x0000ffffaa0247c4 <KeUserModeCallback+16>: stp x21, x22, [sp, #32] 0x0000ffffaa0247c8 <KeUserModeCallback+20>: str w0, [sp, #56] 0x0000ffffaa0247cc <KeUserModeCallback+24>: str x1, [sp, #48] 0x0000ffffaa0247d0 <KeUserModeCallback+28>: str w2, [sp, #60] 0x0000ffffaa0247d4 <KeUserModeCallback+32>: mov x21, x3 0x0000ffffaa0247d8 <KeUserModeCallback+36>: mov x20, x4 0x0000ffffaa0247dc <KeUserModeCallback+40>: add x19, sp, #0x40 // x19=&callback_frame So any code that runs inside this syscall that uses the first 0x40 bytes of stack is trampling these variables in the frame of KeUserModeCallback. Eventually User32LoadSysMenu returns back into KiUserCallbackDispatcher, which passes it into NtCallbackReturn, which does a __wine_longjmp back into the KeUserModeCallback,and we exit from the __wine_setjmp for the second time (returning 0) and get to `return callback_frame.status` https://gitlab.winehq.org/wine/wine/-/blob/wine-7.17/dlls/ntdll/unix/signal…. But then the epilogue starts peeling off the stack => 0x0000ffffaa024864 <+176>: ldr w0, [sp, #1088] 0x0000ffffaa024868 <+180>: ldp x19, x20, [sp, #16] 0x0000ffffaa02486c <+184>: ldp x21, x22, [sp, #32] 0x0000ffffaa024870 <+188>: ldp x29, x30, [sp] 0x0000ffffaa024874 <+192>: add sp, sp, #0x450 0x0000ffffaa024878 <+196>: ret and the link register $x30 = (void *) 0xffffaa024984 <NtCallbackReturn+104>, rather than 0xffffa8f0ccdc <copy_sys_popup+44> as it was when it was pushed in the prologue. It's overwritten several times along the way, but I don't think any of these call sites are at fault; they are just writing to what they think is their own stack frame, unaware that __wine_syscall_dispatcher adjusted $sp to too-high a value and they are overwriting space that belongs to KeUserModeCallback. The specific places that overwrote this entry on the stack were #0 0x0000ffffa8f37a48 in NtUserCallOneParam (arg=0, code=2) at /home/yukondev/workspace/wine/dlls/win32u/sysparams.c:5357 #1 0x0000ffffaa022cf0 in __wine_syscall_dispatcher () from /opt/wine/bin/../lib/wine/aarch64-unix/ntdll.so which set it to 0xffffaa022cf0 <__wine_syscall_dispatcher+272> #0 insert_menu_item (ret_pos=0x21f538, flags=1024, id=4294967295, handle=0x10042) at /home/yukondev/workspace/wine/dlls/win32u/menu.c:438 #1 NtUserThunkedMenuItemInfo (handle=0x10042, pos=4294967295, flags=1024, method=1, info=0x11f528 <opengl_func_names+680>, str=<optimized out>) at /home/yukondev/workspace/wine/dlls/win32u/menu.c:1297 #2 0x0000ffffaa022cf0 in __wine_syscall_dispatcher () from /opt/wine/bin/../lib/wine/aarch64-unix/ntdll.so which set it to NULL and 0x0000ffffaa023a0c in NtCurrentTeb () at /home/yukondev/workspace/wine/dlls/ntdll/unix/signal_arm64.c:1449 1449 { (gdb) bt #0 0x0000ffffaa023a0c in NtCurrentTeb () at /home/yukondev/workspace/wine/dlls/ntdll/unix/signal_arm64.c:1449 #1 0x0000ffffaa02493c in ntdll_get_thread_data () at /home/yukondev/workspace/wine/dlls/ntdll/unix/unix_private.h:70 #2 arm64_thread_data () at /home/yukondev/workspace/wine/dlls/ntdll/unix/signal_arm64.c:163 #3 NtCallbackReturn (ret_ptr=0x0, ret_len=0, status=65602) at /home/yukondev/workspace/wine/dlls/ntdll/unix/signal_arm64.c:784 #4 0x0000ffffaa022cf0 in __wine_syscall_dispatcher () from /opt/wine/bin/../lib/wine/aarch64-unix/ntdll.so which set it to 0xffffaa02493c <NtCallbackReturn+32>, and then 0xffffaa024978 <NtCallbackReturn+92> , then 0xffffaa024984 <NtCallbackReturn+104> The same sort of thing happens in the x86_64 dispatcher, but there it turns out to be pretty harmless. The key difference is that the function prologue on x86_64 used `push` instructions, and did so prior to the `sub` where it allocated space for locals, so the things popped by the epilogue ended up above callback_frame, rather than below it, and so are not smashed. 0x00007fd17b6dc1d2 <+0>: push %rbp 0x00007fd17b6dc1d3 <+1>: mov %rsp,%rbp 0x00007fd17b6dc1d6 <+4>: push %r14 0x00007fd17b6dc1d8 <+6>: push %r13 0x00007fd17b6dc1da <+8>: push %r12 0x00007fd17b6dc1dc <+10>: push %rdi 0x00007fd17b6dc1dd <+11>: push %rsi 0x00007fd17b6dc1de <+12>: push %rbx 0x00007fd17b6dc1df <+13>: sub $0xa0,%rsp 0x00007fd17b6dc1e6 <+20>: and $0xffffffffffffffc0,%rsp 0x00007fd17b6dc1ea <+24>: sub $0x560,%rsp There is still a 32-byte gap between the $rsp of KeUserModeCallback and &current_frame that is briefly at risk, but 1. This seems to be the register parameter area of the Windows x64 ABI, which is actually volatile space that belongs to the callee even though it's allocated by the caller, so the compiler is not expecting it to survive across function calls (in this case __wine_syscall_dispatcher_return). https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/cpp/build/stack-usage?view=msvc-170 discusses how this "contains at least 4 entries", i.e. 32 bytes: https://eli.thegreenplace.net/2011/09/06/stack-frame-layout-on-x86-64 2. It doesn't actually get smashed, because __wine_syscall_dispatcher subtracts 0x20 from the restored $rsp before actually making the syscall (https://gitlab.winehq.org/wine/wine/-/blob/d50112b4b6e82782d3924a8dbd443f82…). Which is presumably since the SysV ABI does *not* make any such reservation, and so __wine_syscall_dispatcher needs to do so to be following the ms_abi. So together, these mean that on x86_64, it would be OK if __wine_syscall_dispatcher used these 32 bytes between the correct $rsp of KeUserModeCallback and frame->syscall_table (though it doesn't seem to). And the eventual callee gets a $rsp that does *not* overlap with KeUserModeCallback (even though it would be legal for it to do so). I don't know that we have any actual guarantee that callback_frame will be at the bottom, but in practice it seems to be. But on aarch64, there's important stuff below callback_frame, so this doesn't work out. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 29

[Bug 48811] New: StarCraft II fails to load in staging, crashes after trying to start a game in stable
by WineHQ Bugzilla 23 Jun '23

23 Jun '23

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48811 Bug ID: 48811 Summary: StarCraft II fails to load in staging, crashes after trying to start a game in stable Product: Wine Version: 5.4 Hardware: x86 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: dbghelp Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: wschmrdr(a)gmail.com Distribution: --- Created attachment 66725 --> https://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=66725 Output occurring when the application crashes. Ever since upgrading from 5.3 to 5.4, StarCraft II has ceased working. On staging, this occurs during the loading screen. I am able to get through the Battle.net app OK, but cannot get to my login authenticating. I have tried switching to stable, but when trying to load up a game, I see the same output issue. Selected the dbghelp component because that's the line that comes up in the output at the time of the crash. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 15

[Bug 53431] New: widl generates enum forward declarations in typedefs which are not valid in C++
by WineHQ Bugzilla 23 Jun '23

23 Jun '23

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53431 Bug ID: 53431 Summary: widl generates enum forward declarations in typedefs which are not valid in C++ Product: Wine Version: 7.13 Hardware: x86-64 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: tools Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: gfw.kra(a)gmail.com Distribution: --- Hi everyone, I recently discovered an issue with C++ code in headers compiled from winrt idl's using widl. It does not compile when included, when tried using mingw g++ v12.1.0. There’s seems to be issue with how enum typedefs are translated within namespaces. Example: When tried to include windows.media.speechsynthesis.h compiled from windows.media.speechsynthesis.idl in cpp file, the following output is received (compiler output shows headers from mingw, but these look the same when compiled using widl in wine). ``` /usr/x86_64-w64-mingw32/include/windows.foundation.h:90:26: error: use of enum ‘PropertyType’ without previous declaration 90 | typedef enum PropertyType PropertyType; | ^~~~~~~~~~~~ /usr/x86_64-w64-mingw32/include/windows.foundation.h:164:18: error: using typedef-name ‘ABI::Windows::Foundation::PropertyType’ after ‘enum’ 164 | enum PropertyType { | ^~~~~~~~~~~~ /usr/x86_64-w64-mingw32/include/windows.foundation.h:90:39: note: ‘ABI::Windows::Foundation::PropertyType’ has a previous declaration here 90 | typedef enum PropertyType PropertyType; | ^~~~~~~~~~~~ /usr/x86_64-w64-mingw32/include/windows.media.speechsynthesis.h:218:30: error: use of enum ‘VoiceGender’ without previous declaration 218 | typedef enum VoiceGender VoiceGender; | ^~~~~~~~~~~ /usr/x86_64-w64-mingw32/include/windows.media.speechsynthesis.h:476:22: error: using typedef-name ‘ABI::Windows::Media::SpeechSynthesis::VoiceGender’ after ‘enum’ 476 | enum VoiceGender { | ^~~~~~~~~~~ /usr/x86_64-w64-mingw32/include/windows.media.speechsynthesis.h:218:42: note: ‘ABI::Windows::Media::SpeechSynthesis::VoiceGender’ has a previous declaration here 218 | typedef enum VoiceGender VoiceGender; | ^~~~~~~~~~~ /usr/x86_64-w64-mingw32/include/windows.media.speechsynthesis.h:822:30: error: using typedef-name ‘ABI::Windows::Media::SpeechSynthesis::VoiceGender’ after ‘enum’ 822 | enum VoiceGender *value) = 0; | ^~~~~~~~~~~ /usr/x86_64-w64-mingw32/include/windows.media.speechsynthesis.h:218:42: note: ‘ABI::Windows::Media::SpeechSynthesis::VoiceGender’ has a previous declaration here 218 | typedef enum VoiceGender VoiceGender; ``` windows.media.speechsynthesis.idl has typedef of enum VoiceGender, which is defined later. ``` namespace Windows { namespace Foundation { interface IClosable; } namespace Media { namespace SpeechSynthesis { typedef enum VoiceGender VoiceGender; ``` This is translated to following: ``` #ifdef __cplusplus namespace ABI { namespace Windows { namespace Media { namespace SpeechSynthesis { typedef enum VoiceGender VoiceGender; } } } } #else /* __cplusplus */ typedef enum __x_ABI_CWindows_CMedia_CSpeechSynthesis_CVoiceGender __x_ABI_CWindows_CMedia_CSpeechSynthesis_CVoiceGender; #endif /* __cplusplus */ ``` This typedef is not valid in C++. According to the standard, enum cannot be forward declared using typedef. This could be replaced with just simple enum declaration, but it would need to have type specifier (that goes for definition as well). Best regards. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 1

[Bug 36079] New: loader fails to build with clang -faddress=sanitize
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org 23 Jun '23

23 Jun '23

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36079 Bug ID: 36079 Summary: loader fails to build with clang -faddress=sanitize Product: Wine Version: 1.7.17 Hardware: x86 OS: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: download, source Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: build-env Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: austinenglish(a)gmail.com Created attachment 48263 --> https://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=48263 make log I tried building wine with clang's address sanitizer enabled, which mostly worked, until the loader: make[1]: Entering directory '/home/austin/wine-gcc49-asan/loader' clang -fsanitize=address -m32 -o wine-preloader -static -nostartfiles -nodefaultlibs -Wl,-Ttext=0x7c400000 preloader.o ../libs/port/libwine_port.a /usr/lib64/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/4.8.2/../../../../lib32/libpthread.a(pthread_mutex_lock.o): In function `__pthread_mutex_lock': /var/tmp/portage/sys-libs/glibc-2.19/work/glibc-2.19/nptl/../nptl/pthread_mutex_lock.c:80: undefined reference to `__assert_fail' /var/tmp/portage/sys-libs/glibc-2.19/work/glibc-2.19/nptl/../nptl/pthread_mutex_lock.c:116: undefined reference to `__assert_fail' /var/tmp/portage/sys-libs/glibc-2.19/work/glibc-2.19/nptl/../nptl/pthread_mutex_lock.c:146: undefined reference to `__assert_fail' /var/tmp/portage/sys-libs/glibc-2.19/work/glibc-2.19/nptl/../nptl/pthread_mutex_lock.c:151: undefined reference to `__assert_fail' .. austin@aw25 ~/wine-gcc49-asan $ clang --version clang version 3.3 (tags/RELEASE_33/final) Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Thread model: posix austin@aw25 ~/wine-gcc49-asan $ git describe wine-1.7.17-42-g24c5728 -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

2 3

[Bug 49797] New: WIDL doesn't tolerate anonymous structs within interfaces
by WineHQ Bugzilla 23 Jun '23

23 Jun '23

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49797 Bug ID: 49797 Summary: WIDL doesn't tolerate anonymous structs within interfaces Product: Wine Version: unspecified Hardware: x86-64 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: tools Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: kolan_n(a)mail.ru Distribution: --- IDLs in Windows SDKs sometimes contain anonymous structs within interfaces. WIDL fails to compile such IDLs. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 2

[Bug 37346] New: New application , installed successfully , starts up fine , no data storing , BUSY WIN ACCOUNTING APP
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org 23 Jun '23

23 Jun '23

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37346 Bug ID: 37346 Summary: New application , installed successfully , starts up fine , no data storing , BUSY WIN ACCOUNTING APP Product: Wine Version: unspecified Hardware: x86 OS: Mac OS X Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: major Priority: P2 Component: -unknown Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: lax.sunny(a)gmail.com Created attachment 49664 --> https://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=49664 Log created by wine on running the app , problem is with database storage and runtime functions Application named busy win very much famous accounting software tried using number of prefixes application installs smoothly when i run the app it starts up normally but crashes on adding a new company or detecting an old DATABASE -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

2 10

[Bug 50079] New: Wine msiexec fails when building inside a windows/mac os x docker container
by WineHQ Bugzilla 23 Jun '23

23 Jun '23

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50079 Bug ID: 50079 Summary: Wine msiexec fails when building inside a windows/mac os x docker container Product: Wine Version: 5.20 Hardware: x86-64 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: msi Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: spam(a)crasu.de Distribution: --- Created attachment 68535 --> https://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=68535 Run with winedebug=msi and strace Sample dockerfile: FROM ubuntu:20.04 RUN export DEBIAN_FRONTEND="noninteractive" \ && dpkg --add-architecture i386 \ && apt-get update \ && apt-get install -y wget winbind xvfb unzip curl jq \ && apt-get remove -y libmysqlclient21 mysql-common \ && apt autoremove -y RUN wget -nc https://dl.winehq.org/wine-builds/winehq.key && apt-key add winehq.key RUN echo 'deb https://dl.winehq.org/wine-builds/ubuntu/ focal main' > /etc/apt/sources.list.d/wine.list RUN export DEBIAN_FRONTEND="noninteractive" \ && apt-get update \ && apt-get install -o APT::Immediate-Configure=false --install-recommends -y winehq-devel RUN useradd -ms /bin/bash wineuser # Install winemono RUN wget https://dl.winehq.org/wine/wine-mono/5.1.1/wine-mono-5.1.1-x86.msi RUN WINEPREFIX=/home/wineuser/.wine su wineuser -c "wine msiexec /i wine-mono-5.1.1-x86.msi && wineserver -w" Eroor message: 0024:err:msi:ACTION_InstallFiles compressed file wasn't installed (L"bin\\libmono-2.0-x86.dll") 0024:err:msi:execute_script Execution of script 0 halted; action L"InstallFiles" returned 1603 I tried different msis (wine gecko, wine mono, ....) they all fail. After serveral tries the installation sometimes does not through an error. But the package is still not fully installed. Reference: https://github.com/Winetricks/winetricks/issues/1525 -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 6

[Bug 51502] New: Civilization 3 Sound Stutters, loops, and fails (eventually)
by WineHQ Bugzilla 22 Jun '23

22 Jun '23

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=51502 Bug ID: 51502 Summary: Civilization 3 Sound Stutters, loops, and fails (eventually) Product: Wine Version: 6.13 Hardware: x86-64 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: mountmgr.sys Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: bryan(a)varnernet.com Distribution: --- Audio on Civilization III is just not very good. Typical short sounds stutter, playback sounding badly rendered into the target buffer, loop when they shouldn't, etc. The most common problem is for the sound (all of it) to just stop, or just continuously loop a small soundfile that should have been a one-off play at the triggered point in time. Looks like the app is using dsound, along with winmm to mmioOpenA the .wav's. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 4

[Bug 52762] New: DesignDoll will not boot/crashes upon booting.
by WineHQ Bugzilla 22 Jun '23

22 Jun '23

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52762 Bug ID: 52762 Summary: DesignDoll will not boot/crashes upon booting. Product: Wine Version: 7.0 Hardware: x86-64 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: -unknown Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: catchyandcleche(a)gmail.com Distribution: --- Created attachment 72129 --> https://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=72129 This file (designdoll_backtrace01.txt) is the backtrace file/error log file that was created when I tried to run the DesignDoll application. I am using a GUI version of Ubuntu for Desktop (Ubuntu 20.04.4 LTS), also utilizing WINE version 7.0 (Displayed as wine-7.0 in the terminal). When double clicking the .desktop application created on the desktop (DesignDoll.desktop) after installing the DesginDollLauncher.exe program and after making sure that the DesignDoll.desktop shortcut created during the installation process allows launching, the program will boot* but quickly crash. I attached the program error log (see "designdoll_backtrace01.txt). *I can only assume that the application booted (or at least tried to) and quickly crashed. It did not display any indication that the program had booted in the GUI environment. When a window did show up to indicate that the program had run (in a sense), it was to inform me of the fact that the program crashed (or simply could not boot). -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 5

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

wine-bugs September 2022